Education integrity survey: A suggested measurement of integrity in education sector

Z. Nasution, Sari Angraeni, Aida Zulaiha, Hani Mairina Matan, Pipin Purbowati, Siti Patimah, Grady Nagara
{"title":"Education integrity survey: A suggested measurement of integrity in education sector","authors":"Z. Nasution, Sari Angraeni, Aida Zulaiha, Hani Mairina Matan, Pipin Purbowati, Siti Patimah, Grady Nagara","doi":"10.32697/integritas.v8i2.954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integrity as a concept is usually associated with and measured by one of two separate scopes: personal or organizational. This paper argues that in educational institutions such as schools or universities, integrity measurement should not be done by separating personal and organizational concepts. In addition, integrity in education sector is often discussed just from academic perspective such as cheating, plagiarism or other wrongdoings in classroom or research activity. The measurement concept in this paper also includes non-academic aspects such as administrative services, financial management, and procurement. Educational integrity in this paper combines three concepts which are the character dimension (Istiani, 2015), the Corporate Ethical Value model (Kaptein, 2007), and the classification of corrupt behaviors in education compiled by KPK from various resources (2018). To conclude, the concept of educational integrity should be looked as holistic one which can be assessed from the integrity character of students, the ecosystem that influences them, and also the compliance level of school’s governance. This offered concept tries to fulfill the strategic role in encouraging educational stakeholders to massively and systematically evaluate the achievement of integrity improvement in the education sector, including the human capital result.","PeriodicalId":336909,"journal":{"name":"Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i2.954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrity as a concept is usually associated with and measured by one of two separate scopes: personal or organizational. This paper argues that in educational institutions such as schools or universities, integrity measurement should not be done by separating personal and organizational concepts. In addition, integrity in education sector is often discussed just from academic perspective such as cheating, plagiarism or other wrongdoings in classroom or research activity. The measurement concept in this paper also includes non-academic aspects such as administrative services, financial management, and procurement. Educational integrity in this paper combines three concepts which are the character dimension (Istiani, 2015), the Corporate Ethical Value model (Kaptein, 2007), and the classification of corrupt behaviors in education compiled by KPK from various resources (2018). To conclude, the concept of educational integrity should be looked as holistic one which can be assessed from the integrity character of students, the ecosystem that influences them, and also the compliance level of school’s governance. This offered concept tries to fulfill the strategic role in encouraging educational stakeholders to massively and systematically evaluate the achievement of integrity improvement in the education sector, including the human capital result.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育诚信调查:一项衡量教育部门诚信的建议
诚信作为一个概念,通常与两个独立的范围之一相关联并由其衡量:个人或组织。本文认为,在学校或大学等教育机构中,不应该将个人和组织的概念分开来进行诚信测量。此外,教育部门的诚信往往只是从学术的角度来讨论,比如在课堂或研究活动中作弊、抄袭或其他不当行为。本文的度量概念还包括行政服务、财务管理和采购等非学术方面。本文的教育诚信结合了性格维度(Istiani, 2015)、企业伦理价值模型(Kaptein, 2007)和KPK从各种资源中编制的教育腐败行为分类(2018)三个概念。综上所述,教育诚信的概念应该是一个整体的概念,可以从学生的诚信特征、影响学生的生态系统以及学校治理的合规水平三个方面来评估。这一提出的概念试图在鼓励教育利益相关者大规模和系统地评估教育部门诚信改善的成就,包括人力资本结果方面发挥战略作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inovasi kebijakan kepala daerah dari jalur perseorangan The prevention of political corruption and implementation of the Political Party Integrity System in Partai Kebangkitan Bangsa Anti-corruption system 4.0: The adoption of blockchain technology in the public sector Persepsi mahasiswa sebagai pemilih pemula terhadap normalisasi politik uang dalam pemilihan umum Penerapan whistleblowing system pada partai politik sebagai upaya pencegahan tindak pidana korupsi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1