GP Benchmark: Engineering a Crowd-Sourcing Platform for Real-Time Understanding of Personality and Cognitive Biases in Clinical Error

Wesley Hutchinson, S. Helal, C. Bull
{"title":"GP Benchmark: Engineering a Crowd-Sourcing Platform for Real-Time Understanding of Personality and Cognitive Biases in Clinical Error","authors":"Wesley Hutchinson, S. Helal, C. Bull","doi":"10.1109/REWBAH51211.2020.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Errors in medicine are a significant problem, highlighted as a global safety priority. General Practice is one clinical arena where error is more likely due to clinical decisions being made on a background of clinical complexity, undifferentiated symptoms and diseases, and multiple other factors as yet unquantified. Interventions designed to reduce error are either underutilised, untested, fail to produce lasting results, are designed on inadequate knowledge, or have failed to appreciate the interaction of multiple factors, both cognitive and systemic. We present a potential solution, in the form of GP Benchmark. GP Benchmark is an online simulation environment and tool designed to test clinical decision making in a group of practicing General Practitioners. Its aim is to address two pressing requirements: 1) the need to capture clinical decision making in real-time, in the context of personality, cognitive bias and environmental factors, and 2) the need to provide a validated platform that models the clinical environment so future intervention decisions may be tested without risking patient safety. We highlight the requirements satisfied for implementing GP Benchmark, the plans for validation, and discuss how GP Benchmark will be used to identify further requirements necessary to develop the environment into a tool for testing clinical decision support systems and error prevention strategies.","PeriodicalId":255019,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE First International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Well-Being, Aging, and Health (REWBAH)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE First International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Well-Being, Aging, and Health (REWBAH)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REWBAH51211.2020.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Errors in medicine are a significant problem, highlighted as a global safety priority. General Practice is one clinical arena where error is more likely due to clinical decisions being made on a background of clinical complexity, undifferentiated symptoms and diseases, and multiple other factors as yet unquantified. Interventions designed to reduce error are either underutilised, untested, fail to produce lasting results, are designed on inadequate knowledge, or have failed to appreciate the interaction of multiple factors, both cognitive and systemic. We present a potential solution, in the form of GP Benchmark. GP Benchmark is an online simulation environment and tool designed to test clinical decision making in a group of practicing General Practitioners. Its aim is to address two pressing requirements: 1) the need to capture clinical decision making in real-time, in the context of personality, cognitive bias and environmental factors, and 2) the need to provide a validated platform that models the clinical environment so future intervention decisions may be tested without risking patient safety. We highlight the requirements satisfied for implementing GP Benchmark, the plans for validation, and discuss how GP Benchmark will be used to identify further requirements necessary to develop the environment into a tool for testing clinical decision support systems and error prevention strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GP基准:设计一个用于临床错误中人格和认知偏差实时理解的众包平台
医学错误是一个重大问题,被强调为全球安全优先事项。全科医生是一个临床领域,由于临床决策是在临床复杂性、未区分的症状和疾病以及许多其他尚未量化的因素的背景下做出的,因此更有可能出现错误。旨在减少错误的干预措施要么未得到充分利用,未经测试,未能产生持久的结果,要么是在知识不足的基础上设计的,要么是未能认识到认知和系统等多种因素的相互作用。我们提出了一个潜在的解决方案,以GP基准的形式。GP基准是一个在线模拟环境和工具,旨在测试一组执业全科医生的临床决策。它的目的是解决两个紧迫的需求:1)需要实时捕获临床决策,在人格,认知偏见和环境因素的背景下;2)需要提供一个经过验证的平台,模拟临床环境,以便未来的干预决策可以在不危及患者安全的情况下进行测试。我们强调了实施GP Benchmark所满足的需求,验证计划,并讨论了如何使用GP Benchmark来确定进一步的需求,以将环境开发为测试临床决策支持系统和错误预防策略的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REWBAH 2020 Commentary A Multi-Aspectual Requirements Analysis for Artificial Intelligence for Well-being REWBAH 2020 Index Software Engineering Issues: An exploratory study into the development of Health Information Systems for people with Mild Intellectual and Developmental Disability Translating Advances in Medical Knowledge to Software Requirements : The Lead User Requirements Engineering Method - LURE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1