Block Jump Height Assessment Based on Kinetic Approach in Volleyball Players: Is There any Difference Between Methods?

A. Fatahi, Razieh Yousefian Molla, M. Ameli
{"title":"Block Jump Height Assessment Based on Kinetic Approach in Volleyball Players: Is There any Difference Between Methods?","authors":"A. Fatahi, Razieh Yousefian Molla, M. Ameli","doi":"10.32598/ptj.11.4.200.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Various kinematics and kinetics methods have been proposed for the assessment of jumping ability as a critical skill in professional volleyball players, but little is known about the accuracy and differences between these methods. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to answer the question “Is there any difference between the results of various kinetic methods in the assessment of block jump height in volleyball players or not?” Methods: Twenty-one healthy male junior volleyball players of the Iran national team performed the block jump task on a force platform. Three common formulas mostly used in literature based on kinetics output of force platform were selected for the comparison of resultant jump height. Descriptive analysis, Shapiro-Wilk test, and ANOVA were used for statistical calculations (p<0.05). Results: The results showed no significant difference between the means of block jump heights measured based on different kinetic methods in volleyball players. Conclusion: Formula calculation methods are very valid for measuring the jump height of the block jump and lead to very similar results for estimating jump height and are also replaceable with each other.","PeriodicalId":436083,"journal":{"name":"Physical Treatments: Specific Physical Therapy Journal","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Treatments: Specific Physical Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/ptj.11.4.200.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Various kinematics and kinetics methods have been proposed for the assessment of jumping ability as a critical skill in professional volleyball players, but little is known about the accuracy and differences between these methods. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to answer the question “Is there any difference between the results of various kinetic methods in the assessment of block jump height in volleyball players or not?” Methods: Twenty-one healthy male junior volleyball players of the Iran national team performed the block jump task on a force platform. Three common formulas mostly used in literature based on kinetics output of force platform were selected for the comparison of resultant jump height. Descriptive analysis, Shapiro-Wilk test, and ANOVA were used for statistical calculations (p<0.05). Results: The results showed no significant difference between the means of block jump heights measured based on different kinetic methods in volleyball players. Conclusion: Formula calculation methods are very valid for measuring the jump height of the block jump and lead to very similar results for estimating jump height and are also replaceable with each other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于动力法的排球运动员拦网跳高评价:不同方法有区别吗?
目的:作为职业排球运动员的一项关键技能,人们已经提出了各种各样的运动学和动力学方法来评估跳跃能力,但这些方法之间的准确性和差异却鲜为人知。因此,本研究的目的是回答“在排球运动员拦网跳高的评估中,各种动力学方法的结果是否存在差异?”方法:21名健康的伊朗男排少年运动员在强制跳台上进行跳远比赛。选取了文献中常用的三个基于力平台动力学输出的公式,对最终跳高进行了比较。统计学计算采用描述性分析、Shapiro-Wilk检验和方差分析(p<0.05)。结果:不同运动方法测定的排球运动员拦网跳高均数无显著差异。结论:公式计算方法对测定跳远跳高是非常有效的,对跳远跳高的估计结果非常相似,并且彼此之间具有可替代性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is online exercise at home more effective than hydrotherapy and physiotherapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain? A randomized clinical trial The effect of the neuromuscular, strength and combined training on balance and performance in female basketball players Comparing the relations of demographic indicators, health status and physical fitness, socioeconomic indicators and sexual function with quality of life in women with chronic non-specific low back pain Tele-rehabilitation the benefits and drawbacks Do patellofemoral pain patients have higher loading rate compared to healthy indivalues? A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1