Assessment of subclinical mastitis in milch animals by different field diagnostic tests in Barishal district of Bangladesh

Jaisan Islam, F. I. Rume, Isart Jahan Liza, P. Chaudhary, A. Anower
{"title":"Assessment of subclinical mastitis in milch animals by different field diagnostic tests in Barishal district of Bangladesh","authors":"Jaisan Islam, F. I. Rume, Isart Jahan Liza, P. Chaudhary, A. Anower","doi":"10.3329/aajbb.v4i1.64872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was carried out to assess the prevalence of subclinical mastitis in milch animals by different field diagnostic tests. A total of 100 milk samples (40 cow, 40 buffalo and 20 goat) were culled to pursue this study which were subjected to physical assay and subsequently screened for subclinical mastitis by using 5 different field diagnostic tests viz. California Mastitis Test (CMT), White Side Test (WST), White Side + Dye Test (WSDT), Surf Test (ST) and Surf + Dye Test (SDT). Overall prevalence of subclinical mastitis (SCM) found in this study was 42.5%, 32.5% and 35% in cow, buffalo and goat respectively. Higher prevalence of SCM was detected in cow (47.06%) and buffalo (53.85%) aged between 3 to 5 years whereas in goat (57.15%), 2 to 3 years of age. In aspect of breed, crossbred cow (50%), Murrah buffalo (40%) and Jamunapari goat (50%) were found more affected with SCM. The prevalence of SCM was higher in cows of 3rd parity (41.18%), buffaloes of both 2nd and 3rd parity (30.77%) and goats of 2nd parity (42.86%). Animals being in mid lactation gave more positive cases (46.67% cow, 46.67% buffalo and 42.85% goat). SCM was found in higher prevalence in high yielding animals and in animals that were not being subjected to hygienic milking practice. Among the 5 diagnostic tests, SCM detection efficacy in comparison was higher by CMT. So as SCM has been found to be a major ascending risk in the area, the hygienic milk production activity in this area as a whole requires an intervention including further investigation on the etiological agents associated with prevalence of mastitis to undertake measurable control options of mastitis in the area. \nAsian Australas. J. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2019, 4 (1), 24-33","PeriodicalId":184754,"journal":{"name":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Bioscience and Biotechnology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Bioscience and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/aajbb.v4i1.64872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study was carried out to assess the prevalence of subclinical mastitis in milch animals by different field diagnostic tests. A total of 100 milk samples (40 cow, 40 buffalo and 20 goat) were culled to pursue this study which were subjected to physical assay and subsequently screened for subclinical mastitis by using 5 different field diagnostic tests viz. California Mastitis Test (CMT), White Side Test (WST), White Side + Dye Test (WSDT), Surf Test (ST) and Surf + Dye Test (SDT). Overall prevalence of subclinical mastitis (SCM) found in this study was 42.5%, 32.5% and 35% in cow, buffalo and goat respectively. Higher prevalence of SCM was detected in cow (47.06%) and buffalo (53.85%) aged between 3 to 5 years whereas in goat (57.15%), 2 to 3 years of age. In aspect of breed, crossbred cow (50%), Murrah buffalo (40%) and Jamunapari goat (50%) were found more affected with SCM. The prevalence of SCM was higher in cows of 3rd parity (41.18%), buffaloes of both 2nd and 3rd parity (30.77%) and goats of 2nd parity (42.86%). Animals being in mid lactation gave more positive cases (46.67% cow, 46.67% buffalo and 42.85% goat). SCM was found in higher prevalence in high yielding animals and in animals that were not being subjected to hygienic milking practice. Among the 5 diagnostic tests, SCM detection efficacy in comparison was higher by CMT. So as SCM has been found to be a major ascending risk in the area, the hygienic milk production activity in this area as a whole requires an intervention including further investigation on the etiological agents associated with prevalence of mastitis to undertake measurable control options of mastitis in the area. Asian Australas. J. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2019, 4 (1), 24-33
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过孟加拉国巴里沙尔地区不同的现场诊断试验评估哺乳动物的亚临床乳腺炎
本研究旨在通过不同的现场诊断测试来评估哺乳动物亚临床乳腺炎的患病率。本研究共选取了100份牛奶样本(40份奶牛、40份水牛和20份山羊)进行物理检测,随后通过5种不同的现场诊断测试,即加州乳腺炎测试(CMT)、白侧测试(WST)、白侧+染料测试(WSDT)、冲浪测试(ST)和冲浪+染料测试(SDT)筛选亚临床乳腺炎。本研究发现,奶牛、水牛和山羊亚临床乳腺炎(SCM)的总体患病率分别为42.5%、32.5%和35%。3 ~ 5岁奶牛(47.06%)和水牛(53.85%)的SCM患病率较高,2 ~ 3岁山羊(57.15%)的SCM患病率较高。在品种方面,杂交母牛(50%)、默拉水牛(40%)和Jamunapari山羊(50%)的发病率较高。第三胎奶牛(41.18%)、第二胎和第三胎水牛(30.77%)和第二胎山羊(42.86%)的SCM患病率较高。哺乳期中期动物阳性率较高(奶牛46.67%,水牛46.67%,山羊42.85%)。发现SCM在高产动物和未进行卫生挤奶实践的动物中发病率较高。5种诊断方法中,CMT对SCM的检测效率高于CMT。因此,由于SCM已被发现是该地区主要的上升风险,因此该地区的卫生牛奶生产活动整体上需要采取干预措施,包括进一步调查与乳腺炎流行相关的病原,以采取可测量的控制措施。亚洲Australas。j . Biosci。生物技术,2019,4 (1),24-33
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Embracing diversity in bioscience and biotechnology as a path towards innovation and progress Bacterial wilt of tobacco in Bangladesh: a pilot study for assessment of the status, detection of seed-borne nature and genetic variation of its pathogen, Ralstonia solanacearum DNA barcoding and phylogenetic relationships of ten butterfly caterpillars Population distribution and breeding practices of livestock in different districts of Bangladesh Degradation of selected organophosphorus pesticide residues and their pre harvest interval determination in hyacinth bean grown commercially in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1