Focus, Asset Tangibility and Value Creation in M&A Transactions: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry

C. Wieber, D. Schiereck
{"title":"Focus, Asset Tangibility and Value Creation in M&A Transactions: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry","authors":"C. Wieber, D. Schiereck","doi":"10.31014/aior.1992.03.02.235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through mergers and acquisitions the pharmaceutical industry has changed in the last years like never before. The widespread paradigm that acquirers face negative returns at acquisition announcement, resulting in significant losses, no longer applies. Including the largest consolidation wave in 2013 to 2016, we find overarching highly positive returns for acquirers, targets and combined entities. With a differentiated analysis approach of categorizing events in specialization, diversification and R&D-driven acquisitions based on the acquirer and target’s business model, we are able to assess intra-industry M&A success drivers holistically and from a completely new angle. Not only are we seeing specialization acquisitions from an acquirer perspective outperform the other two types by around 2%, but also targets in R&D-related acquisitions face an increase of roughly 50%, more than two times of the other groups’ returns. Furthermore, the results highlight that acquirers earn the highest returns in asset deal transactions, while the sellers are worse off. Finally, we see the largest M&A wave in the industry ever since leads to positive and superior reactions of around 3%. In parallel, the tense market situation results in a paradigm shift not only for the affected M&A parties, but for the competitors as well. Where there was a parallel movement of the acquirers’ and competitors’ abnormal announcement returns in the early years of the millennium, there now is a shift in the opposite direction, meaning that good news for the acquirer now implies bad news for the competitor.","PeriodicalId":254594,"journal":{"name":"EngRN: Pharmaceutical Engineering (Topic)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EngRN: Pharmaceutical Engineering (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.03.02.235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through mergers and acquisitions the pharmaceutical industry has changed in the last years like never before. The widespread paradigm that acquirers face negative returns at acquisition announcement, resulting in significant losses, no longer applies. Including the largest consolidation wave in 2013 to 2016, we find overarching highly positive returns for acquirers, targets and combined entities. With a differentiated analysis approach of categorizing events in specialization, diversification and R&D-driven acquisitions based on the acquirer and target’s business model, we are able to assess intra-industry M&A success drivers holistically and from a completely new angle. Not only are we seeing specialization acquisitions from an acquirer perspective outperform the other two types by around 2%, but also targets in R&D-related acquisitions face an increase of roughly 50%, more than two times of the other groups’ returns. Furthermore, the results highlight that acquirers earn the highest returns in asset deal transactions, while the sellers are worse off. Finally, we see the largest M&A wave in the industry ever since leads to positive and superior reactions of around 3%. In parallel, the tense market situation results in a paradigm shift not only for the affected M&A parties, but for the competitors as well. Where there was a parallel movement of the acquirers’ and competitors’ abnormal announcement returns in the early years of the millennium, there now is a shift in the opposite direction, meaning that good news for the acquirer now implies bad news for the competitor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并购交易中的焦点、资产有形性与价值创造:来自医药行业的证据
通过兼并和收购,制药行业在过去几年发生了前所未有的变化。收购方在宣布收购时面临负回报,从而导致重大损失的普遍模式不再适用。包括2013年至2016年最大的整合浪潮在内,我们发现收购方、目标方和合并实体总体上都获得了高度正回报。基于收购方和目标方的商业模式,我们采用差异化的分析方法,对专业化、多元化和研发驱动型收购进行分类,从而能够从一个全新的角度全面评估行业内的并购成功驱动因素。从收购方的角度来看,我们不仅看到专业化收购的表现比其他两种类型的收购高出约2%,而且研发相关收购的目标也面临着约50%的增长,是其他类别回报的两倍多。此外,研究结果强调,在资产交易交易中,收购者获得的回报最高,而卖方的情况更糟。最后,我们看到了行业内最大的并购浪潮,大约3%的积极和卓越的反应。与此同时,紧张的市场形势不仅对受影响的并购双方,而且对竞争对手也造成了范式转变。在本世纪初,收购方和竞争对手的异常公告回报是平行的,而现在则是相反的方向,这意味着收购方的好消息现在意味着竞争对手的坏消息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gelatin Methacrylate Loaded with Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes Promotes High-Quality Healing of Injured Tendon by Activating Both SMAD1/5/9 and SMAD2/3 Criteria for Selecting Aerosol Packaging and Determining the Optimum Quantity of a Propellant Focus, Asset Tangibility and Value Creation in M&A Transactions: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry Stimuli-Responsive Poly(ionic Liquid) Micelle For Controlled Drug Delivery Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Tannin Content in Domestic Beer Samples with Fe(III) and 1,10-Phenanthroline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1