Computing Domain Abstractions for Optimal Classical Planning with Counterexample-Guided Abstraction Refinement

Raphael Kreft, Clemens Büchner, Silvan Sievers, M. Helmert
{"title":"Computing Domain Abstractions for Optimal Classical Planning with Counterexample-Guided Abstraction Refinement","authors":"Raphael Kreft, Clemens Büchner, Silvan Sievers, M. Helmert","doi":"10.1609/icaps.v33i1.27198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstraction heuristics are the state of the art in optimal classical\nplanning as heuristic search. A popular method for computing\nabstractions is the counterexample-guided abstraction refinement\n(CEGAR) principle, which has successfully been used for projections,\nwhich are the abstractions underlying pattern databases, and\nCartesian abstractions. While projections are simple and fast to\ncompute, Cartesian abstractions subsume projections and hence allow\nmore fine-grained abstractions, however at the expense of efficiency.\nDomain abstractions are a third class of abstractions between\nprojections and Cartesian abstractions in terms of generality. Yet,\nto the best of our knowledge, they are only briefly considered in the\nplanning literature but have not been used for computing heuristics\nyet. We aim to close this gap and compute domain abstractions by using\nthe CEGAR principle. Our empirical results show that domain\nabstractions compare favorably against projections and Cartesian\nabstractions.","PeriodicalId":239898,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v33i1.27198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstraction heuristics are the state of the art in optimal classical planning as heuristic search. A popular method for computing abstractions is the counterexample-guided abstraction refinement (CEGAR) principle, which has successfully been used for projections, which are the abstractions underlying pattern databases, and Cartesian abstractions. While projections are simple and fast to compute, Cartesian abstractions subsume projections and hence allow more fine-grained abstractions, however at the expense of efficiency. Domain abstractions are a third class of abstractions between projections and Cartesian abstractions in terms of generality. Yet, to the best of our knowledge, they are only briefly considered in the planning literature but have not been used for computing heuristics yet. We aim to close this gap and compute domain abstractions by using the CEGAR principle. Our empirical results show that domain abstractions compare favorably against projections and Cartesian abstractions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于反例引导的最优经典规划的计算域抽象
抽象启发式算法是经典最优规划中最先进的启发式搜索方法。计算抽象的一种流行方法是反例引导的抽象细化(CEGAR)原则,该原则已成功地用于投影(模式数据库底层的抽象)和笛卡尔抽象。虽然投影计算简单且快速,但笛卡尔抽象包含了投影,因此允许更细粒度的抽象,但以牺牲效率为代价。领域抽象是介于投影和笛卡尔抽象之间的第三类抽象。然而,据我们所知,它们只在规划文献中被简要地考虑过,而没有被用于计算启发式系统。我们的目标是通过使用CEGAR原理来缩小这一差距并计算领域抽象。我们的实证结果表明,领域抽象优于投影和笛卡尔抽象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fast and Robust Resource-Constrained Scheduling with Graph Neural Networks Solving the Multi-Choice Two Dimensional Shelf Strip Packing Problem with Time Windows Generalizing Action Justification and Causal Links to Policies Exact Anytime Multi-Agent Path Finding Using Branch-and-Cut-and-Price and Large Neighborhood Search A Constraint Programming Solution to the Guillotine Rectangular Cutting Problem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1