Two Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Assessment of Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients after Myocardial Infarction

Saad Moustafa Kamal Eldin Ibrahim Khalil, El-khashab Khalid A, Ragab Tamer M
{"title":"Two Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Assessment of Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients after Myocardial Infarction","authors":"Saad Moustafa Kamal Eldin Ibrahim Khalil, El-khashab Khalid A, Ragab Tamer M","doi":"10.23937/2643-3966/1710028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Adverse Left Ventricular Remodelling (LVR), defined as progressive ventricular dilatation, distortion of chamber shape, myocardial hypertrophy and deteriorating function, begins in some patients who suffered from Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), sometimes even after successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). If uninterrupted, it could lead to Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and a poor clinical outcome. Aims: This study aims at evaluating the value of Speckle Tracking Echocardiography (STE) in predicting LVR after successful PCI in AMI patients. Materials and Methods: Eighty-four AMI patients had a complete echocardiographic study, including speckle tracking, performed two days after PCI and then two months afterwards. The patients were then divided into two groups based on the presenceh of remodelling; R+ (remodelling) group and R- (non-remodelling) group. Results: At the baseline study, group R+ showed significantly lower strain parameters than group R-. These included Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) (-11.14 ± 0.5 VS -16.78 ± 0.4, p˂0.0001), longitudinal strain rate (-1.01 ± 0.05 VS -1.07 ± 0.04, p˂0.0001), Culprit Longitudinal Strain (CulLS) (-9.74 ± 0.59 VS -15.68 ± 0.49, P˂0.0001), and culprit longitudinal strain rate (-0.95 ± 0.05 VS -1.02 ± 0.04, P˂0.0001). In the follow up study, all of the strain parameters studied were again significantly lower in the R+ than the R- group. The most sensitive and specific parameters were the GLS and CulLS (sensitivities of 91.7% and 95.8% respectively and specificities of 95% and 96.7% respectively). Conclusion: Our findings show that impaired indices of LV deformation detected two days after successful PCI for AMI may provide a predictive value in early detection of LV remodelling.","PeriodicalId":170730,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2643-3966/1710028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adverse Left Ventricular Remodelling (LVR), defined as progressive ventricular dilatation, distortion of chamber shape, myocardial hypertrophy and deteriorating function, begins in some patients who suffered from Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), sometimes even after successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). If uninterrupted, it could lead to Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and a poor clinical outcome. Aims: This study aims at evaluating the value of Speckle Tracking Echocardiography (STE) in predicting LVR after successful PCI in AMI patients. Materials and Methods: Eighty-four AMI patients had a complete echocardiographic study, including speckle tracking, performed two days after PCI and then two months afterwards. The patients were then divided into two groups based on the presenceh of remodelling; R+ (remodelling) group and R- (non-remodelling) group. Results: At the baseline study, group R+ showed significantly lower strain parameters than group R-. These included Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) (-11.14 ± 0.5 VS -16.78 ± 0.4, p˂0.0001), longitudinal strain rate (-1.01 ± 0.05 VS -1.07 ± 0.04, p˂0.0001), Culprit Longitudinal Strain (CulLS) (-9.74 ± 0.59 VS -15.68 ± 0.49, P˂0.0001), and culprit longitudinal strain rate (-0.95 ± 0.05 VS -1.02 ± 0.04, P˂0.0001). In the follow up study, all of the strain parameters studied were again significantly lower in the R+ than the R- group. The most sensitive and specific parameters were the GLS and CulLS (sensitivities of 91.7% and 95.8% respectively and specificities of 95% and 96.7% respectively). Conclusion: Our findings show that impaired indices of LV deformation detected two days after successful PCI for AMI may provide a predictive value in early detection of LV remodelling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二维斑点跟踪超声心动图评价心肌梗死后左心室重构
背景:不良左心室重构(LVR),定义为进行性心室扩张,腔室形状扭曲,心肌肥厚和功能恶化,开始于一些急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者,有时甚至在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)成功后。如果不间断,它可能导致充血性心力衰竭(CHF)和不良的临床结果。目的:本研究旨在评价斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)对AMI患者PCI术后LVR的预测价值。材料与方法:84例AMI患者在PCI术后2天和术后2个月分别进行了完整的超声心动图研究,包括斑点追踪。然后根据是否存在重构将患者分为两组;R+(重塑)组和R-(非重塑)组。结果:在基线研究中,R+组的应变参数明显低于R-组。其中包括全局纵向应变(GLS)(-11.14±0.5 VS -16.78±0.4,p小于0.0001)、纵向应变率(-1.01±0.05 VS -1.07±0.04,p小于0.0001)、罪魁祸首纵向应变(CulLS)(-9.74±0.59 VS -15.68±0.49,p小于0.0001)和罪魁祸首纵向应变率(-0.95±0.05 VS -1.02±0.04,p小于0.0001)。在后续研究中,R+组的所有应变参数均明显低于R-组。GLS和CulLS是最敏感和特异的参数,灵敏度分别为91.7%和95.8%,特异度分别为95%和96.7%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在AMI成功PCI后两天检测到的左室变形受损指数可能对早期发现左室重构提供预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients with Brugada Syndrome: Foremost Risk Factors Associated with Arrhythmic Events Medical and Day-to-Day Burden on Families of Children with Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Who Have Undergone Single Ventricle Surgical Palliation over a Decade Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Assessment among South and South-East Asian Migrants Living in Greater Sydney, Australia: A Cross-Sectional Study Persistence of Stress Related Left Ventricular Filling Abnormality in Treated Hypertensive Patients A Case Series: Long-Term Follow-Up of Four Patients with Kawasaki Disease who Developed Coronary Artery Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1