Cost-Effectiveness and Resiliency Evaluation of Net-Zero Energy U.S. Residential Communities

Jordan Thompson, M. Krarti
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness and Resiliency Evaluation of Net-Zero Energy U.S. Residential Communities","authors":"Jordan Thompson, M. Krarti","doi":"10.1115/1.4051656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, a resiliency analysis is carried out to assess the energy, economic, and power outage survivability benefits of efficient and net-zero energy communities. The analysis addresses the appropriate steps to designing an energy-efficient and net-zero energy community using Phoenix, Arizona, as a primary location for weather and utility inputs. A baseline home is established using International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2018 code requirements. Three occupancy levels are evaluated in BEopt to provide diversity in the community’s building stock. The loads from the baseline, energy-efficient optimum, and net-zero energy optimum single-family homes are utilized to determine energy use profiles for various residential community types using occupancy statistics for Phoenix. Then, REopt is used to determine the photovoltaic (PV) and battery storage system sizes necessary for the community to survive a 72-hour power outage. The analysis results indicated that the baseline community requires a 544-kW PV system and 375-kW/1,564 kWh battery storage system to keep all electrical loads online during a 72-hour power outage. The energy-efficient community requires a 291-kW PV system and a 202-kW/820 kWh battery storage system while the net-zero energy community requires a 291-kW PV system and a 191-kW/880 kWh battery storage system. In this study, the economic analysis indicates that it is 31% more cost-effective to install a shared PV plus storage system than to install individual PV plus storage systems in an energy-efficient community. After analyzing the system sizes and costs required to survive various outage durations, it is found that only a 4% difference in net present cost exists between a system sized for a 24-hour outage and a 144-hour outage. In the event of a pandemic or an event that causes a community-wide lockdown, the energy-efficient community would only survive 6 h out of a 72-hour power outage during a time where plug loads are increased by 50% due to added laptops, monitors, and other office electronics. Finally, a climate sensitivity analysis is conducted for efficient communities in Naperville, Illinois, and Augusta, Maine. The analysis suggests that for a 72-hour power outage starting on the peak demand day and time of the year, the cost of resiliency is higher in climates with more heating and cooling needs as heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and cooling (HVAC) is consistently the largest load in a residential building.","PeriodicalId":326594,"journal":{"name":"ASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, a resiliency analysis is carried out to assess the energy, economic, and power outage survivability benefits of efficient and net-zero energy communities. The analysis addresses the appropriate steps to designing an energy-efficient and net-zero energy community using Phoenix, Arizona, as a primary location for weather and utility inputs. A baseline home is established using International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2018 code requirements. Three occupancy levels are evaluated in BEopt to provide diversity in the community’s building stock. The loads from the baseline, energy-efficient optimum, and net-zero energy optimum single-family homes are utilized to determine energy use profiles for various residential community types using occupancy statistics for Phoenix. Then, REopt is used to determine the photovoltaic (PV) and battery storage system sizes necessary for the community to survive a 72-hour power outage. The analysis results indicated that the baseline community requires a 544-kW PV system and 375-kW/1,564 kWh battery storage system to keep all electrical loads online during a 72-hour power outage. The energy-efficient community requires a 291-kW PV system and a 202-kW/820 kWh battery storage system while the net-zero energy community requires a 291-kW PV system and a 191-kW/880 kWh battery storage system. In this study, the economic analysis indicates that it is 31% more cost-effective to install a shared PV plus storage system than to install individual PV plus storage systems in an energy-efficient community. After analyzing the system sizes and costs required to survive various outage durations, it is found that only a 4% difference in net present cost exists between a system sized for a 24-hour outage and a 144-hour outage. In the event of a pandemic or an event that causes a community-wide lockdown, the energy-efficient community would only survive 6 h out of a 72-hour power outage during a time where plug loads are increased by 50% due to added laptops, monitors, and other office electronics. Finally, a climate sensitivity analysis is conducted for efficient communities in Naperville, Illinois, and Augusta, Maine. The analysis suggests that for a 72-hour power outage starting on the peak demand day and time of the year, the cost of resiliency is higher in climates with more heating and cooling needs as heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and cooling (HVAC) is consistently the largest load in a residential building.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国住宅社区净零能耗的成本效益和弹性评估
本文进行了弹性分析,以评估高效和净零能耗社区的能源、经济和停电生存能力效益。分析指出了以亚利桑那州凤凰城作为气象和公用事业输入的主要地点,设计节能和净零能耗社区的适当步骤。基线住宅是根据国际节能法规(IECC) 2018的规范要求建立的。BEopt评估了三个占用水平,以提供社区建筑存量的多样性。根据凤凰城的入住率统计数据,利用基线负荷、最佳能效和净零能耗最佳单户住宅来确定各种住宅社区类型的能源使用概况。然后,REopt用于确定光伏(PV)和电池存储系统的大小,以满足社区在72小时停电时的需求。分析结果表明,基线社区需要544千瓦的光伏系统和375千瓦/ 1564千瓦时的电池存储系统,以在72小时停电期间保持所有电力负荷在线。节能社区需要291千瓦的光伏系统和202千瓦/820千瓦时的电池储能系统,而净零能耗社区需要291千瓦的光伏系统和191千瓦/880千瓦时的电池储能系统。在这项研究中,经济分析表明,在节能社区中,安装共享光伏+储能系统比安装单个光伏+储能系统的成本效益高31%。在分析了各种停机持续时间所需的系统大小和成本之后,发现在24小时停机和144小时停机的系统大小之间,净当前成本仅存在4%的差异。如果发生流行病或导致整个社区封锁的事件,在72小时停电期间,由于增加了笔记本电脑、显示器和其他办公电子设备,插头负载增加了50%,节能社区只能存活6小时。最后,对伊利诺伊州内珀维尔和缅因州奥古斯塔的高效社区进行了气候敏感性分析。分析表明,在一年中需求高峰时段开始的72小时停电中,由于采暖、通风、空调和制冷(HVAC)一直是住宅建筑中最大的负荷,因此在采暖和制冷需求较多的气候条件下,弹性成本更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Building Design and Operating Strategies on Urban Heat Island Effects Part II: Sensitivity Analysis ASSESSING ENERGY SAVINGS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REFLECTIVE ROOF COATINGS IN FOUR USA CLIMATE ZONES AN ELEMENTARY APPROACH TO EVALUATING THE THERMAL SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WITH THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE A PROPOSED METHOD AND CASE STUDY OF WASTE HEAT RECOVERY IN AN INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION Impact of Building Operating Strategies on Urban Heat Island Effects Part I: Model Development and Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1