Utilidad del ácido ursodesoxicólico para la prevención de la litiasis vesicular y sus complicaciones en pacientes sometidos a bypass gástrico

F. Acosta, M. E. Muriel, Manuel García, Fernando Martínez Lascano, J. Foscarini, C. Esquivel
{"title":"Utilidad del ácido ursodesoxicólico para la prevención de la litiasis vesicular y sus complicaciones en pacientes sometidos a bypass gástrico","authors":"F. Acosta, M. E. Muriel, Manuel García, Fernando Martínez Lascano, J. Foscarini, C. Esquivel","doi":"10.52787/agl.v52i1.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Rapid weight loss after bariatric surgery is a risk factor for the development of gallstones and its complications. The administration of ursodeoxycholic acid could be a preventive alternative. Aim. To compare the incidence of gallstones in patients treated and not treated with ursodeoxycholic acid and, secondarily, to evaluate the rate of cholecystectomy in each group. Materials and methods. Observational, retrospective cohort study of two non-randomized populations of patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. The first population was collected retrospectively and the second prospectively and consecutively. Group 1 (without intervention) underwent surgery between January 2016 and December 2018 and did not receive medication, and group 2 (with intervention): operated between May 2019 and October 2020, to whom ursodeoxycholic acid was administered at 600 mg/day for six months. In all cases, abdominal ultrasound was performed at six and twelve months after surgery. Results. In group 1 (n = 73), 21 patients (28.7%) presented an ultrasound finding of gallstones at 6 months, 2 at 12 months (2.73%), for a total of 23 patients (31.5%). In group 2 (n = 32), 4 patients (12.5%) presented a diagnosis of gallstones in the first follow-up period and 1 case in the second, for a total of 5 patients (p = 0.067). Eighteen cholecystectomies were performed due to clinical manifestations related to gallbladder pathology: 17 cases in Group 1 (24.65%) and 1 in Group 2 (3.12%), with a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0,0435). Conclusion. We have observed a lower incidence of gallstones in the group that received ursodeoxycholic acid, which was clinically relevant, without reaching statistically significant differences. On the other hand, a significant decrease was observed in the number of cholecystectomies one year after bariatric surgery.","PeriodicalId":270053,"journal":{"name":"Acta gastroenterológica latinoamericana","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta gastroenterológica latinoamericana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52787/agl.v52i1.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Rapid weight loss after bariatric surgery is a risk factor for the development of gallstones and its complications. The administration of ursodeoxycholic acid could be a preventive alternative. Aim. To compare the incidence of gallstones in patients treated and not treated with ursodeoxycholic acid and, secondarily, to evaluate the rate of cholecystectomy in each group. Materials and methods. Observational, retrospective cohort study of two non-randomized populations of patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. The first population was collected retrospectively and the second prospectively and consecutively. Group 1 (without intervention) underwent surgery between January 2016 and December 2018 and did not receive medication, and group 2 (with intervention): operated between May 2019 and October 2020, to whom ursodeoxycholic acid was administered at 600 mg/day for six months. In all cases, abdominal ultrasound was performed at six and twelve months after surgery. Results. In group 1 (n = 73), 21 patients (28.7%) presented an ultrasound finding of gallstones at 6 months, 2 at 12 months (2.73%), for a total of 23 patients (31.5%). In group 2 (n = 32), 4 patients (12.5%) presented a diagnosis of gallstones in the first follow-up period and 1 case in the second, for a total of 5 patients (p = 0.067). Eighteen cholecystectomies were performed due to clinical manifestations related to gallbladder pathology: 17 cases in Group 1 (24.65%) and 1 in Group 2 (3.12%), with a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0,0435). Conclusion. We have observed a lower incidence of gallstones in the group that received ursodeoxycholic acid, which was clinically relevant, without reaching statistically significant differences. On the other hand, a significant decrease was observed in the number of cholecystectomies one year after bariatric surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尿去氧胆酸在预防胃旁路手术患者水疱性结石及其并发症中的应用
介绍。减肥手术后体重迅速下降是胆结石及其并发症发生的危险因素。熊去氧胆酸是一种预防方法。的目标。比较接受熊去氧胆酸治疗和未接受熊去氧胆酸治疗的患者胆结石的发生率,其次,评估两组患者胆囊切除术的发生率。材料和方法。两组接受胃分流术患者的观察性、回顾性队列研究。第一种群采用回顾性采集,第二种群采用前瞻性连续采集。1组(无干预)于2016年1月至2018年12月进行手术,未接受药物治疗;2组(有干预)于2019年5月至2020年10月进行手术,给予熊去氧胆酸600 mg/天,为期6个月。所有病例均在术后6个月和12个月进行腹部超声检查。结果。组1 (n = 73), 6个月时超声发现胆结石21例(28.7%),12个月时超声发现胆结石2例(2.73%),共23例(31.5%)。组2 (n = 32),第一期随访诊断胆结石4例(12.5%),第二期随访1例,共5例(p = 0.067)。因胆囊病理相关临床表现行胆囊切除术18例:1组17例(24.65%),2组1例(3.12%),差异有统计学意义(p≤0.0435)。结论。我们观察到熊去氧胆酸组胆结石发生率较低,具有临床相关性,但差异无统计学意义。另一方面,在减肥手术一年后,胆囊切除术的数量显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Colitis linfocítica inducida por ácido valproico en un paciente pediátrico: reporte de caso Impacto de los P-CABs en el tratamiento de las enfermedades relacionadas con el ácido: una revisión de la evidencia “Que el alimento sea tu medicina”: el dilema de la falta de acceso a la terapia alimentaria en enfermedad celíaca El futuro de los ensayos clínicos Obstrucción intestinal duodenal en una adolescente femenina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1