AFRICANS ARE NOT BLAMELESS AND HOW AFRICANS UNDERDEVELOPED AFRICA: A TWIN RESPONSE TO HOW EUROPE UNDERDEVELOPED AFRICA

Richard Akaan, I. Akuva
{"title":"AFRICANS ARE NOT BLAMELESS AND HOW AFRICANS UNDERDEVELOPED AFRICA: A TWIN RESPONSE TO HOW EUROPE UNDERDEVELOPED AFRICA","authors":"Richard Akaan, I. Akuva","doi":"10.48028/iiprds/ijormsse.v8.i1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examined the contending views on the development of Africa, focusing essentially on the twin responses from “Africans Are Not Blameless” and “How Africans Underdeveloped Africa,” to Walter Rodney’s “How Europe Underdeveloped Africa.” The paper critically reviews and interrogates the contending views on the challenge of development in Africa, bringing out the strengths and weaknesses of these arguments as they border on Africa’s development. With a careful review of these tripod views on the development challenges of the African Continent, the paper argues that both Europe and Africans are to be blamed for the problem of development in Africa as each of the perspectives is found culpable as they fail in their efforts to exhaustively advance a holistic cause and effect analysis of the Africa’s development story. In one way or the other, the attempts to advance their views and justify their stands from the lenses of their propositions, was not completely successful. This is why the paper concludes that, understanding the issue of development in Africa is to synthesize the arguments of these contending views. The paper calls on Africans to rise to the occasion to restore the glory of Africa through perseverance, hard work and reaffirmation of the uniqueness of Africa as a continent, and thus, the need to look inward and reexamine the ways of life of the people as Africans, and with this sense of Africanness, tackle head-on the challenges affecting the continent and reposition it for the greater good of the people.","PeriodicalId":270657,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Operational Research in Management, Social Sciences, and Education","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Operational Research in Management, Social Sciences, and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48028/iiprds/ijormsse.v8.i1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examined the contending views on the development of Africa, focusing essentially on the twin responses from “Africans Are Not Blameless” and “How Africans Underdeveloped Africa,” to Walter Rodney’s “How Europe Underdeveloped Africa.” The paper critically reviews and interrogates the contending views on the challenge of development in Africa, bringing out the strengths and weaknesses of these arguments as they border on Africa’s development. With a careful review of these tripod views on the development challenges of the African Continent, the paper argues that both Europe and Africans are to be blamed for the problem of development in Africa as each of the perspectives is found culpable as they fail in their efforts to exhaustively advance a holistic cause and effect analysis of the Africa’s development story. In one way or the other, the attempts to advance their views and justify their stands from the lenses of their propositions, was not completely successful. This is why the paper concludes that, understanding the issue of development in Africa is to synthesize the arguments of these contending views. The paper calls on Africans to rise to the occasion to restore the glory of Africa through perseverance, hard work and reaffirmation of the uniqueness of Africa as a continent, and thus, the need to look inward and reexamine the ways of life of the people as Africans, and with this sense of Africanness, tackle head-on the challenges affecting the continent and reposition it for the greater good of the people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲人并非无可指责,非洲人如何发展非洲:这是对欧洲如何发展非洲的双重回应
本文考察了关于非洲发展的争论观点,主要集中在“非洲人并非无可指责”和“非洲人如何发展非洲”的双重回应,以及沃尔特·罗德尼的“欧洲如何发展非洲”。本文对有关非洲发展挑战的争论观点进行了批判性的回顾和质疑,并在这些观点与非洲发展有关时,提出了这些观点的优缺点。通过对这些关于非洲大陆发展挑战的三脚架观点的仔细回顾,本文认为欧洲和非洲人都应该为非洲的发展问题负责,因为他们没有努力全面地推进对非洲发展故事的整体因果分析,因此每个观点都是有罪的。以这样或那样的方式,试图推进他们的观点,并从他们的主张的镜头证明他们的立场,并不是完全成功的。这就是为什么这篇论文得出结论,理解非洲的发展问题就是综合这些争论观点的论点。该文件呼吁非洲人通过坚持不懈,努力工作和重申非洲作为一个大陆的独特性来恢复非洲的荣耀,因此,需要向内看,重新审视作为非洲人的生活方式,并以这种非洲意识,正面解决影响非洲大陆的挑战,并为人民的更大利益重新定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IMPACT OF ORGANISATIONAL JUSTICE ON ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT [A STUDY OF OGUN STATE PROPERTY AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION (OPIC), OGUN STATE] The State of the Sustainable Development Goals in the United States MARKETING FACTORS AND STUDENTS LOW ENROLMENT IN BSC MARKETING DEGREE PROGRAMME IN BABCOCK UNIVERSITY IMPACT OF CAPITAL FLIGHT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA NEXUS BETWEEN UNEMPLOYMENT, INFLATION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NIGERIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1