Data-driven cycle time prediction of fitting and welding stations in steel fabrication

Kamyab Aghajamali, Alaeldin Suliman, Abdulaziz  Alattas, Z. Lei
{"title":"Data-driven cycle time prediction of fitting and welding stations in steel fabrication","authors":"Kamyab Aghajamali, Alaeldin Suliman, Abdulaziz  Alattas, Z. Lei","doi":"10.29173/mocs273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The construction industry's lack of materials, resources, and financial assets streamlined a shift toward using digital lean principles to obtain precise management over the limited resources. Steel fabrication companies rely heavily upon the enormous equipment to get promising results.  However, implementing lean principles in the fabrication process is not straightforward due to the non-repetitive nature of steel construction products. Hence, the time-based modeling for such a process lacks accuracy and reliability, especially for manual steel fabrication processes.  Accordingly, the current study aims to achieve a practical and accurate estimation of fabrication time aspects.  This study targets modeling manual steel fabrication processes (fitting and welding workstations) in terms of processing times (cycle time and value-added time). The proposed approach builds a machine learning (ML) model to estimate the identified processing time aspects. For performance assessment, the typical correlation analysis and linear regression (LR) approach was used as a benchmark to quantify the ML model's pros and cons in terms of practicality and accuracy. The required data source for this study is a steel fabrication industry partner. The results of this study show ML superiority in accuracy over LR processing time predictive models, particularly when predictive parameters increase ML presents a 13.2 % improvement in mean squared error compared to the LR predictive model. LR models need fewer data and are not computationally expensive like ML models, making them more practical. Additionally, the study introduces a precise and practical time estimation approach. Such an approach provides precious input for simulation models which support evidence-based decisions and benefits quantification of plans.","PeriodicalId":422911,"journal":{"name":"Modular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit Proceedings","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/mocs273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction industry's lack of materials, resources, and financial assets streamlined a shift toward using digital lean principles to obtain precise management over the limited resources. Steel fabrication companies rely heavily upon the enormous equipment to get promising results.  However, implementing lean principles in the fabrication process is not straightforward due to the non-repetitive nature of steel construction products. Hence, the time-based modeling for such a process lacks accuracy and reliability, especially for manual steel fabrication processes.  Accordingly, the current study aims to achieve a practical and accurate estimation of fabrication time aspects.  This study targets modeling manual steel fabrication processes (fitting and welding workstations) in terms of processing times (cycle time and value-added time). The proposed approach builds a machine learning (ML) model to estimate the identified processing time aspects. For performance assessment, the typical correlation analysis and linear regression (LR) approach was used as a benchmark to quantify the ML model's pros and cons in terms of practicality and accuracy. The required data source for this study is a steel fabrication industry partner. The results of this study show ML superiority in accuracy over LR processing time predictive models, particularly when predictive parameters increase ML presents a 13.2 % improvement in mean squared error compared to the LR predictive model. LR models need fewer data and are not computationally expensive like ML models, making them more practical. Additionally, the study introduces a precise and practical time estimation approach. Such an approach provides precious input for simulation models which support evidence-based decisions and benefits quantification of plans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数据驱动的钢铁加工装配和焊接工位周期预测
建筑行业缺乏材料、资源和金融资产,这促使他们转向使用数字化精益原则,以对有限的资源进行精确管理。钢铁制造公司在很大程度上依赖于巨大的设备来获得有希望的结果。  然而,由于钢结构产品的非重复性,在制造过程中实施精益原则并不简单。因此,这种过程的基于时间的建模缺乏准确性和可靠性,特别是对于手工钢制造过程。  因此,本研究的目的是实现制造时间方面的实用和准确的估计。  本研究的目标是在加工时间(周期时间和增值时间)方面对手工钢制造过程(装配和焊接工作站)进行建模。该方法建立了一个机器学习(ML)模型来估计识别的处理时间方面。在性能评估方面,采用典型的相关分析和线性回归(LR)方法作为基准,量化ML模型在实用性和准确性方面的优缺点。本研究所需的数据来源是钢铁制造行业的合作伙伴。这项研究的结果表明,ML在准确性上优于LR处理时间预测模型,特别是当预测参数增加时,ML的均方误差比LR预测模型提高了13.2%。LR模型需要更少的数据,并且不像ML模型那样需要昂贵的计算成本,这使得它们更实用。此外,本文还介绍了一种精确实用的时间估计方法。这种方法为仿真模型提供了宝贵的 输入 ,这些模型支持基于证据的决策和计划的效益量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
VDC management in the industrialization process using prefabricated reinforcement cages. Case Study: Ovalo Monitor Bridge Keyword identification framework for speech communication on construction sites Offsite Construction education adoption in Civil Engineering undergraduate curriculum: analysis and proposal Layout modelling of the built environment for autonomous mobile robots using Building Information Modelling (BIM) and simulation An holistic approach to product evaluation and selection in industrialised building: Benchmarking of long span, low carbon floor systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1