Factors that make open innovation more successful than traditional approaches

Jacob Dencik, Lisa Fisher, Lisa Higgins, Anthony Lipp, Anthony Marshall, Kirsten Palmer
{"title":"Factors that make open innovation more successful than traditional approaches","authors":"Jacob Dencik, Lisa Fisher, Lisa Higgins, Anthony Lipp, Anthony Marshall, Kirsten Palmer","doi":"10.1108/sl-05-2023-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nFour management capabilities for successfully operationalizing open innovation are: strategy and culture, ecosystem capability, internal capability and technology enablement. Surveying more than 1,000 executives on current open innovation practices and capabilities, IBM IBV was able to identify how the different operating model capabilities interact and complement each other to drive better innovation and business performance.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTo help organizations build and improve their open innovation capabilities, the IBM Institute for Business Value (IBV) partnered with APQC to develop the Ecosystem-Enabled Innovation Maturity Model (EEIMM) - an open standards model encompassing four domain competencies required for successful open innovation. To assess the maturity and benchmark the performance of organizations’ open innovation capabilities, the IBV, in collaboration with Oxford Economics, used the EEIMM to survey over 1000 leaders responsible for open innovation at their organizations.\n\n\nFindings\nFour management capabilities for successfully operationalizing open innovation are: strategy and culture, ecosystem capability, internal capability and technology enablement. IBV analysis found that organizations that are more advanced in developing the four building blocks see significantly better performance across key financial and innovation metrics.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFor every dollar of investment, the proportion of direct revenue attributed to open innovation is four times higher than for traditional innovation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nLeading organizations are embracing open innovation as a critical component of innovation strategy and investment. They recognize that adopting open innovation yields far greater returns than traditional innovation can. Recent research by the IBM Institute for Business Value (IBM IBV) reveals, for example, that as many as 84 percent of executives now view open innovation as important for their organization’s future growth.\n","PeriodicalId":169963,"journal":{"name":"Strategy & Leadership","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategy & Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sl-05-2023-0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Four management capabilities for successfully operationalizing open innovation are: strategy and culture, ecosystem capability, internal capability and technology enablement. Surveying more than 1,000 executives on current open innovation practices and capabilities, IBM IBV was able to identify how the different operating model capabilities interact and complement each other to drive better innovation and business performance. Design/methodology/approach To help organizations build and improve their open innovation capabilities, the IBM Institute for Business Value (IBV) partnered with APQC to develop the Ecosystem-Enabled Innovation Maturity Model (EEIMM) - an open standards model encompassing four domain competencies required for successful open innovation. To assess the maturity and benchmark the performance of organizations’ open innovation capabilities, the IBV, in collaboration with Oxford Economics, used the EEIMM to survey over 1000 leaders responsible for open innovation at their organizations. Findings Four management capabilities for successfully operationalizing open innovation are: strategy and culture, ecosystem capability, internal capability and technology enablement. IBV analysis found that organizations that are more advanced in developing the four building blocks see significantly better performance across key financial and innovation metrics. Practical implications For every dollar of investment, the proportion of direct revenue attributed to open innovation is four times higher than for traditional innovation. Originality/value Leading organizations are embracing open innovation as a critical component of innovation strategy and investment. They recognize that adopting open innovation yields far greater returns than traditional innovation can. Recent research by the IBM Institute for Business Value (IBM IBV) reveals, for example, that as many as 84 percent of executives now view open innovation as important for their organization’s future growth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放式创新比传统方法更成功的因素
成功实施开放式创新的四种管理能力是:战略与文化、生态系统能力、内部能力和技术实现能力。IBM IBV对1000多名高管进行了关于当前开放式创新实践和能力的调查,确定了不同的运营模型能力如何相互作用并相互补充,以推动更好的创新和业务绩效。设计/方法/方法为了帮助组织建立和提高他们的开放式创新能力,IBM商业价值研究院(IBV)与APQC合作开发了生态系统支持的创新成熟度模型(EEIMM)——一个包含成功开放式创新所需的四个领域能力的开放式标准模型。为了评估组织开放式创新能力的成熟度和基准绩效,IBV与牛津经济研究院合作,使用EEIMM对1000多名负责组织开放式创新的领导者进行了调查。成功实施开放式创新的四种管理能力是:战略与文化、生态系统能力、内部能力和技术支持。IBV分析发现,在开发四个构建模块方面更先进的组织在关键财务和创新指标上的表现明显更好。实际意义对于每一美元的投资,开放式创新的直接收入比例是传统创新的四倍。创新/价值领先的组织正在将开放式创新作为创新战略和投资的关键组成部分。他们认识到,采用开放式创新比传统创新产生的回报要大得多。例如,IBM商业价值研究院(IBM IBV)最近的一项研究显示,多达84%的高管现在认为开放式创新对其组织的未来发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How responsible research can improve management decision making Metaverse: the post--hype future The relationship between coaching behaviors by situational leaders and new employee engagement Strategic communication & corporate sustainability within global supply chains Unprecedented leadership: learning to lead in turbulent times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1