SUBJECTIVITY IN GERMAN ENGINEERING DISCOURSE

N. Shnyakina, A. M. Klyoster
{"title":"SUBJECTIVITY IN GERMAN ENGINEERING DISCOURSE","authors":"N. Shnyakina, A. M. Klyoster","doi":"10.36622/mlmdr.2022.50.35.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statement of the problem. This article is devoted to the description of the means of expressing subjectivity in engineering discourse. Attention is focused on the evaluative component of cognitive activity, namely, hedonistic, normative, utilitarian, teleological, psychological, aesthetic and ethical assessments. The stated goal seems relevant, since it touches upon the currently significant problem of the specifics of reflecting individual cognitive and pragmatic prerequisites of linguistic modeling of reality in professional speech. Results. Based on the material of German-language scientific and technical texts, the linguistic specifics of various types of assessment are analyzed. The unit of analysis is a terminological fragment containing an indication of the attitude of the author of the message to inventions, their sphere of service, processes, scientific ideas, and theories. Along with neutral nominations, there are a sufficient number of metaphorically reinterpreted units in the German language, indicating the emotional attitude of the author to the subject of speech. Conclusions. The analysis of the factual material allowed us to conclude that the cognitive basis for the existence of subjectivity in engineering discourse is the orientation of the researcher on evaluation scales, each of which reflects the degree of compliance of a parameter with the norm and is characterized by gradation having various forms of linguistic expression. The most significant scales in the framework of professional communication are normative, utilitarian and teleological. This is due to the orientation of scientific research on the usefulness and expediency of inventions for society, their positive impact on the standard of living, as well as the need to unify scientific search algorithms involving the establishment of a set of norms and rules in a certain subject area.","PeriodicalId":303001,"journal":{"name":"Modern Linguistic and Methodical-and-Didactic Researches","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Linguistic and Methodical-and-Didactic Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36622/mlmdr.2022.50.35.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of the problem. This article is devoted to the description of the means of expressing subjectivity in engineering discourse. Attention is focused on the evaluative component of cognitive activity, namely, hedonistic, normative, utilitarian, teleological, psychological, aesthetic and ethical assessments. The stated goal seems relevant, since it touches upon the currently significant problem of the specifics of reflecting individual cognitive and pragmatic prerequisites of linguistic modeling of reality in professional speech. Results. Based on the material of German-language scientific and technical texts, the linguistic specifics of various types of assessment are analyzed. The unit of analysis is a terminological fragment containing an indication of the attitude of the author of the message to inventions, their sphere of service, processes, scientific ideas, and theories. Along with neutral nominations, there are a sufficient number of metaphorically reinterpreted units in the German language, indicating the emotional attitude of the author to the subject of speech. Conclusions. The analysis of the factual material allowed us to conclude that the cognitive basis for the existence of subjectivity in engineering discourse is the orientation of the researcher on evaluation scales, each of which reflects the degree of compliance of a parameter with the norm and is characterized by gradation having various forms of linguistic expression. The most significant scales in the framework of professional communication are normative, utilitarian and teleological. This is due to the orientation of scientific research on the usefulness and expediency of inventions for society, their positive impact on the standard of living, as well as the need to unify scientific search algorithms involving the establishment of a set of norms and rules in a certain subject area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德语工程语篇中的主体性
问题的陈述。本文主要探讨工程语篇中主体性的表达方式。注意力集中在认知活动的评价成分上,即享乐主义的、规范的、功利的、目的论的、心理的、审美的和伦理的评价。所陈述的目标似乎是相关的,因为它触及了当前重要的问题,即在专业演讲中反映现实的语言建模的个人认知和语用先决条件的细节。结果。以德文科技文本材料为基础,分析了各类评价的语言特点。分析单位是一个术语片段,包含信息作者对发明的态度、它们的服务范围、过程、科学思想和理论的指示。除了中性提名外,德语中还存在足够数量的隐喻性重新解释单位,表明作者对言语主体的情感态度。结论。通过对事实材料的分析,我们可以得出结论,工程话语中主体性存在的认知基础是研究人员对评价尺度的取向,每一个评价尺度都反映了一个参数与规范的符合程度,并以具有多种语言表达形式的等级为特征。职业交际框架中最重要的尺度是规范性、功利性和目的性。这是由于科学研究的方向是发明对社会的有用性和权宜之计,它们对生活水平的积极影响,以及需要统一科学搜索算法,涉及在某一学科领域建立一套规范和规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PHRASEOLOGY IN THE FRENCH LITERARY TEXT: FUNCTIONAL AND SEMANTIC ANALYSIS (BASED ON THE MATERIAL OF ANNA GAVALDA'S NOVELS “35 KILOS D'ESPOIR” AND “JE L'AIMAIS”) THE SOCIOCULTURAL ASPECT OF FORMING ENGLISH COMMUNICATIVE SKILLS OF THE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY STUDENTS TAXIS AND PHASE IN THE ASPECT OF THEIR INTERCATEGORIAL INTEGRATION (based on the German language) MEANS OF GENERATING A LANGUAGE GAME IN THE FRENCH ADVERTISING DISCOURSE SPECIFICITY OF FILM QUOTE USE AND FUNCTIONING IN SPEECH OF VARIOUS GENRES: CORPUS-ASSISTED STUDY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1