Repurposing Rhetoric:

A. Clark
{"title":"Repurposing Rhetoric:","authors":"A. Clark","doi":"10.33063/er.v112i.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The division between male and female Classical scholars, articulated in early modern discourse, presents a real tension between female scholarship and the humanist movement’s claims of cultivating male leaders. Such rhetorical difference, however, underplays the extent to which female Latinists were able to access and utilise Latin as part of a dynamic and distinctly sixteenth-century sociocultural code. The education and humanistic activity of Lady Jane Lumley (1537–78) are a valuable case study for our understanding of the use of Latin as a cultural resource for both men and women in sixteenth-century England. Through the interrogation of Lumley’s personal library, this article claims that, in addition to her well-researched translations from Greek, her education in early modern Latin provided her with a set of skills and practices which had significance beyond a public, political context. Outlining the development of reading practices, collecting, and network-building, this study demonstrates the extent of intellectual reciprocity between supposedly male and female humanist curricula, and the cultural value to both sexes of the practices taught.","PeriodicalId":160536,"journal":{"name":"Eranos - Acta philologica Suecana","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eranos - Acta philologica Suecana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33063/er.v112i.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The division between male and female Classical scholars, articulated in early modern discourse, presents a real tension between female scholarship and the humanist movement’s claims of cultivating male leaders. Such rhetorical difference, however, underplays the extent to which female Latinists were able to access and utilise Latin as part of a dynamic and distinctly sixteenth-century sociocultural code. The education and humanistic activity of Lady Jane Lumley (1537–78) are a valuable case study for our understanding of the use of Latin as a cultural resource for both men and women in sixteenth-century England. Through the interrogation of Lumley’s personal library, this article claims that, in addition to her well-researched translations from Greek, her education in early modern Latin provided her with a set of skills and practices which had significance beyond a public, political context. Outlining the development of reading practices, collecting, and network-building, this study demonstrates the extent of intellectual reciprocity between supposedly male and female humanist curricula, and the cultural value to both sexes of the practices taught.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
再利用言辞:
古典学者之间的区分,在早期现代话语中清晰地表达出来,呈现出女性学术与人文主义运动中培养男性领导者的主张之间真正的紧张关系。然而,这种修辞上的差异低估了女性拉丁主义者能够接触和利用拉丁语的程度,这是一个充满活力和独特的16世纪社会文化规范的一部分。简·拉姆利夫人(1537-78)的教育和人文活动是一个有价值的案例研究,可以帮助我们了解16世纪英国男女如何使用拉丁语作为一种文化资源。通过对拉姆利个人图书馆的调查,这篇文章声称,除了她对希腊语的翻译进行了充分的研究外,她接受的早期现代拉丁语教育为她提供了一系列技能和实践,这些技能和实践的意义超出了公共和政治背景。本研究概述了阅读实践、收集和网络建设的发展,展示了所谓的男性和女性人文课程之间的智力互惠程度,以及所教授的实践对两性的文化价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Konjektur zu Lucr. 5,1442 Double Meaning in Sophocles’ Electra 1110–1111 and the Tragedy’s Denouement Text of Pindar, Olympian 13.107–108 Note on Ciris 47 laudes Galli at the end of Virgil’s Georgics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1