Intra-Latina Fertility Differentials in the United States

María Isabel Ayala
{"title":"Intra-Latina Fertility Differentials in the United States","authors":"María Isabel Ayala","doi":"10.5406/WOMGENFAMCOL.5.2.0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assesses whether Latinas’ ethnic and racial self-identification can predict their number of “children ever born” (CEB) after controlling for cultural, socioeconomic, and demographic factors. Analyzed together, these factors measure the role that existing racial/ethnic structures have on the experiences of Latino subgroups. I pool data from the Fertility Supplement of the Integrated Public Use Micro-data Series (IPUMS) Current Population Survey. Following a series of zero-inflated Poisson regressions and controlling for cultural, socioeconomic, and demographic factors, women who ethnically self-identify as Mexican, Puerto Rican, or Central American have more CEB than women who self-identify as Cuban. Simultaneously, Latinas who racially self-identify as white have fewer CEB than nonwhite Latinas. I propose that the different racialized experiences of these groups can help explain these patterns. Moreover, I argue that the results provide empirical evidence of the multicausal explanations for intra-Latina fertility behavior.","PeriodicalId":223911,"journal":{"name":"Women, Gender, and Families of Color","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women, Gender, and Families of Color","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/WOMGENFAMCOL.5.2.0129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study assesses whether Latinas’ ethnic and racial self-identification can predict their number of “children ever born” (CEB) after controlling for cultural, socioeconomic, and demographic factors. Analyzed together, these factors measure the role that existing racial/ethnic structures have on the experiences of Latino subgroups. I pool data from the Fertility Supplement of the Integrated Public Use Micro-data Series (IPUMS) Current Population Survey. Following a series of zero-inflated Poisson regressions and controlling for cultural, socioeconomic, and demographic factors, women who ethnically self-identify as Mexican, Puerto Rican, or Central American have more CEB than women who self-identify as Cuban. Simultaneously, Latinas who racially self-identify as white have fewer CEB than nonwhite Latinas. I propose that the different racialized experiences of these groups can help explain these patterns. Moreover, I argue that the results provide empirical evidence of the multicausal explanations for intra-Latina fertility behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国拉丁裔内部生育率差异
本研究评估了在控制文化、社会经济和人口因素后,拉丁裔的民族和种族自我认同是否可以预测他们的“已出生儿童”(CEB)数量。综合分析,这些因素衡量了现有的种族/民族结构对拉丁裔亚群体经历的作用。我汇集了来自综合公共用途微数据系列(IPUMS)当前人口调查生育补充的数据。在一系列零膨胀泊松回归和控制文化、社会经济和人口因素后,自认为是墨西哥人、波多黎各人或中美洲人的女性比自认为是古巴人的女性有更多的CEB。同时,在种族上自认为是白人的拉美裔人的CEB比非白人拉美裔人少。我认为这些群体的不同种族化经历可以帮助解释这些模式。此外,我认为这些结果为拉丁裔内部生育行为的多因果解释提供了经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"She's Been Doing Everything Right": Mothers of Color and Economic Violence Erased by Respectability: The Intersections of AIDS, Race, and Gender in Black America Introduction: In memoriam: bell hooks, 1952–2021 Challenging Misrepresentations of Black Womanhood: Media, Literature and Theory Labor Organizer Nannie Helen Burroughs and Her National Training School for Women and Girls
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1