OPTIMAL DESIGNS OF GRID-CONNECTED ENERGY EFFICIENT AND RESILIENT RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES

M. Krarti, Sarah Dafoe, K. Baker
{"title":"OPTIMAL DESIGNS OF GRID-CONNECTED ENERGY EFFICIENT AND RESILIENT RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES","authors":"M. Krarti, Sarah Dafoe, K. Baker","doi":"10.1115/1.4053908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As demand continues to grow throughout the United States, new communities have unique opportunities to take advantage of load-side and generation-side integrations with the goal of reducing energy use, improving the environment, and increasing resilience. Most currently reported literature investigates energy efficiency and reduction of building energy consumption or on-site generation and net zero energy goals without resiliency performance analysis. This study examines the impacts of residential building characteristics and energy sources (i.e. electricity and natural gas) on the capacity of the on-site PV generation required to achieve net-zero energy and resiliency goals for a community in Longmont, Colorado. Six community load designs are shown to impact system sizes and costs for on-site generation and resilience. Gas and electrified minimum cost designs reduce source energy from their baselines by 17% and 47% respectively. Gas minimum cost designs reduce initial and annualized energy costs by 487 and247 per year, whereas electrified minimum cost designs increase initial costs by 4, 991 and reduce annualized energy costs by1,266 per year. Resilience designs show that with various outage durations, the longer the outage design case, the larger the system, but the greater the probability of surviving outages throughout the year, with gas communities representing lower probabilities of survivability than electrified communities.","PeriodicalId":326594,"journal":{"name":"ASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As demand continues to grow throughout the United States, new communities have unique opportunities to take advantage of load-side and generation-side integrations with the goal of reducing energy use, improving the environment, and increasing resilience. Most currently reported literature investigates energy efficiency and reduction of building energy consumption or on-site generation and net zero energy goals without resiliency performance analysis. This study examines the impacts of residential building characteristics and energy sources (i.e. electricity and natural gas) on the capacity of the on-site PV generation required to achieve net-zero energy and resiliency goals for a community in Longmont, Colorado. Six community load designs are shown to impact system sizes and costs for on-site generation and resilience. Gas and electrified minimum cost designs reduce source energy from their baselines by 17% and 47% respectively. Gas minimum cost designs reduce initial and annualized energy costs by 487 and247 per year, whereas electrified minimum cost designs increase initial costs by 4, 991 and reduce annualized energy costs by1,266 per year. Resilience designs show that with various outage durations, the longer the outage design case, the larger the system, but the greater the probability of surviving outages throughout the year, with gas communities representing lower probabilities of survivability than electrified communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并网节能和弹性住宅社区的优化设计
随着整个美国的需求持续增长,新社区有独特的机会利用负载侧和发电侧的整合,以减少能源使用,改善环境,提高弹性。目前报道的大多数文献在没有弹性性能分析的情况下调查能源效率和减少建筑能耗或现场发电和净零能耗目标。本研究考察了住宅建筑特征和能源(即电力和天然气)对实现科罗拉多州朗蒙特社区净零能耗和弹性目标所需的现场光伏发电容量的影响。六种社区负荷设计显示影响系统的规模和成本,现场发电和弹性。天然气和电气化的最低成本设计分别减少了17%和47%的基准能源。天然气最低成本设计每年可将初始成本和年化能源成本分别降低487和247,而电气化最低成本设计每年可将初始成本提高4991,年化能源成本降低1266。弹性设计表明,在各种停电持续时间下,停电设计时间越长,系统规模越大,但全年停电幸存的可能性越大,天然气社区的生存概率低于电力社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Building Design and Operating Strategies on Urban Heat Island Effects Part II: Sensitivity Analysis ASSESSING ENERGY SAVINGS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REFLECTIVE ROOF COATINGS IN FOUR USA CLIMATE ZONES AN ELEMENTARY APPROACH TO EVALUATING THE THERMAL SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WITH THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE A PROPOSED METHOD AND CASE STUDY OF WASTE HEAT RECOVERY IN AN INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION Impact of Building Operating Strategies on Urban Heat Island Effects Part I: Model Development and Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1