P. Axaopoulos, E. Fylladitakis, Shaislamov Alisher Shabdurakhmanovich, Abdullaev Nodirbek Azatvay Ogli
{"title":"Financially optimum insulation thickness of external building walls","authors":"P. Axaopoulos, E. Fylladitakis, Shaislamov Alisher Shabdurakhmanovich, Abdullaev Nodirbek Azatvay Ogli","doi":"10.1063/1.5138520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The building sector accounts for nearly half the energy consumption of Uzbekistan, with the residential energy consumption being much greater than that of even the most developed European countries. This is mainly attributed to the very low cost of energy in the region that, in combination with the lack of subsidies, offered no incentive for energy conservation measures. However, the price of energy has been rising at an alarming pace over the past few years, making building energy saving measures a nationwide concern. In this paper, we investigate the financially optimal insulation thickness for the most common external wall configurations using the two most commonly used building insulations materials in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, expanded polystyrene and mineral wool. Annual heating and cooling transmission loads are being calculated based on transient heat flow through the external walls and by using hourly climatic data. Additionally, we performed a financial analysis for each wall configuration and orientation, as well as for various thicknesses of insulation material. Depending on the wall type and orientation, the optimum insulation thickness was found to be between 3.75 cm and 11.0 cm. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis indicates whether changes of the economic parameters affect the optimum insulation thickness.","PeriodicalId":186251,"journal":{"name":"TECHNOLOGIES AND MATERIALS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY: TMREES19Gr","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TECHNOLOGIES AND MATERIALS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY: TMREES19Gr","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5138520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The building sector accounts for nearly half the energy consumption of Uzbekistan, with the residential energy consumption being much greater than that of even the most developed European countries. This is mainly attributed to the very low cost of energy in the region that, in combination with the lack of subsidies, offered no incentive for energy conservation measures. However, the price of energy has been rising at an alarming pace over the past few years, making building energy saving measures a nationwide concern. In this paper, we investigate the financially optimal insulation thickness for the most common external wall configurations using the two most commonly used building insulations materials in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, expanded polystyrene and mineral wool. Annual heating and cooling transmission loads are being calculated based on transient heat flow through the external walls and by using hourly climatic data. Additionally, we performed a financial analysis for each wall configuration and orientation, as well as for various thicknesses of insulation material. Depending on the wall type and orientation, the optimum insulation thickness was found to be between 3.75 cm and 11.0 cm. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis indicates whether changes of the economic parameters affect the optimum insulation thickness.
建筑部门占乌兹别克斯坦能源消耗的近一半,住宅能源消耗甚至比欧洲最发达的国家都要大得多。这主要是由于该区域的能源成本很低,再加上缺乏补贴,没有采取节约能源措施的动力。然而,在过去几年中,能源价格以惊人的速度上涨,使建筑节能措施成为全国关注的问题。在本文中,我们使用乌兹别克斯坦塔什干最常用的两种建筑保温材料,膨胀聚苯乙烯和矿棉,研究了最常见外墙配置的经济最佳保温厚度。根据通过外墙的瞬时热流和每小时的气候数据,计算每年的供暖和制冷传输负荷。此外,我们对每面墙的结构和朝向以及不同厚度的保温材料进行了财务分析。根据墙体类型和朝向的不同,最佳保温厚度在3.75 cm ~ 11.0 cm之间。此外,敏感性分析表明经济参数的变化是否会影响最佳保温厚度。