The Never-ending Story: Postmedia, the Competition Bureau, and Press Ownership in Canada

Marc W. Edge
{"title":"The Never-ending Story: Postmedia, the Competition Bureau, and Press Ownership in Canada","authors":"Marc W. Edge","doi":"10.18192/cjmsrcem.v14i1.6474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2014 purchase by Canada’s largest newspaper chain of its second-largest chain increased concentration of newspaper ownership considerably. The deal’s 2015 approval by the Competition Bureau, some scholars noted, provoked little outcry over the latest federal regulatory failure to stop the increased concentration level. A series of inquiries, from the 1981 report of the Royal Commission on Newspapers to Senate reports in 1970 and 2006, all identified increased concentration of newspaper ownership as a problem and proposed measures to solve it. Formed in the 1980s, the Competition Bureau took action against a local newspaper monopoly in Vancouver in the early 1990s but has been ineffective since. This study charts the historical progress of newspaper ownership concentration in Canada and calculates that Postmedia now publishes 37.6 percent of Canadian paid daily newspaper circulation and owns fifteen of the twenty-two largest Englishlanguage dailies. That includes 75.4 percent in the three westernmost provinces, where Postmedia owns eight of the nine largest dailies. Possible explanations for a lack of outcry include the company’s use of the “death of newspapers” meme as justification and the fact the deal’s effect was felt mostly in Western Canada, far from the corridors of power.","PeriodicalId":401869,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Media Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18192/cjmsrcem.v14i1.6474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2014 purchase by Canada’s largest newspaper chain of its second-largest chain increased concentration of newspaper ownership considerably. The deal’s 2015 approval by the Competition Bureau, some scholars noted, provoked little outcry over the latest federal regulatory failure to stop the increased concentration level. A series of inquiries, from the 1981 report of the Royal Commission on Newspapers to Senate reports in 1970 and 2006, all identified increased concentration of newspaper ownership as a problem and proposed measures to solve it. Formed in the 1980s, the Competition Bureau took action against a local newspaper monopoly in Vancouver in the early 1990s but has been ineffective since. This study charts the historical progress of newspaper ownership concentration in Canada and calculates that Postmedia now publishes 37.6 percent of Canadian paid daily newspaper circulation and owns fifteen of the twenty-two largest Englishlanguage dailies. That includes 75.4 percent in the three westernmost provinces, where Postmedia owns eight of the nine largest dailies. Possible explanations for a lack of outcry include the company’s use of the “death of newspapers” meme as justification and the fact the deal’s effect was felt mostly in Western Canada, far from the corridors of power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
永无止境的故事:加拿大的后媒体、竞争局和媒体所有权
2014年,加拿大最大的报纸连锁店收购了其第二大连锁店,大大提高了报纸所有权的集中度。一些学者指出,2015年美国竞争局(Competition Bureau)批准了这笔交易,但这一次联邦监管机构未能阻止集中度的上升,几乎没有引发强烈抗议。从1981年皇家报业委员会(Royal Commission on Newspapers)的报告,到1970年和2006年参议院的报告,一系列调查都指出,报纸所有权日益集中是一个问题,并提出了解决这个问题的措施。成立于上世纪80年代的竞争局在上世纪90年代初对温哥华一家地方报纸的垄断采取了行动,但自那以后就一直无效。本研究绘制了加拿大报纸所有权集中的历史进程图,并计算出Postmedia现在出版了37.6%的加拿大付费日报发行量,并拥有22家最大的英语日报中的15家。其中,最西部的三个省份占了75.4%,在这三个省份,九家最大的日报中,邮政传媒拥有八家。没有引起强烈抗议的可能解释包括,该公司用“报纸的死亡”作为理由,以及该交易的影响主要在加拿大西部感受到,远离权力走廊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“We Support Harm Reduction”: Frame Analysis of Canadian News Media Coverage of the Opioid Crisis Les relations entre le diffuseur public canadien CBC et les producteurs indépendants. Analyse d’une filière audiovisuelle en transformation Instagram as a Tool to Counter the Image of Countries as Unsafe: the Case of #LiveLoveLebanon A Plea for the Preservation of Early BASIC Game Programs Langue et identité chez les joueurs franco-ontariens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1