Burch Colposuspension Versus Fascial Sling to Reduce Urinary Stress Incontinence

C. Dixon, Giulia I. Lane, Cynthia Fok, M. Moy
{"title":"Burch Colposuspension Versus Fascial Sling to Reduce Urinary Stress Incontinence","authors":"C. Dixon, Giulia I. Lane, Cynthia Fok, M. Moy","doi":"10.1056/nejmx070036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter summarizes the results of the Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy (SISTEr) trial, which randomized women with stress urinary incontinence to an autologous sling procedure versus a Burch colposuspension. Overall treatment success favored the fascial sling over the Burch procedure group, as did the stress incontinence–specific success rate at 24 months. Postoperative voiding dysfunction and urge incontinence were more common in the sling group than the Burch group. These findings supported the historical shift toward slings (autologous and synthetic) versus Burch colposuspension procedures in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":435097,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Urologist Should Know","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"50 Studies Every Urologist Should Know","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmx070036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the results of the Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy (SISTEr) trial, which randomized women with stress urinary incontinence to an autologous sling procedure versus a Burch colposuspension. Overall treatment success favored the fascial sling over the Burch procedure group, as did the stress incontinence–specific success rate at 24 months. Postoperative voiding dysfunction and urge incontinence were more common in the sling group than the Burch group. These findings supported the historical shift toward slings (autologous and synthetic) versus Burch colposuspension procedures in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伯奇阴道悬吊与筋膜悬吊减少尿压力性失禁
本章总结了应激性尿失禁手术治疗效果(SISTEr)试验的结果,该试验将应激性尿失禁的女性随机分为自体悬吊手术和Burch阴道悬吊手术。总的来说,筋膜悬吊优于Burch手术组,24个月时压力性尿失禁的成功率也是如此。术后排尿功能障碍和急迫性尿失禁在吊带组较Burch组更为常见。这些发现支持了在临床实践中向吊带(自体和合成)和Burch阴道悬吊手术的历史转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Before Chemotherapy Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma The Surgical Learning Curve for Prostate Cancer Control After Radical Prostatectomy Docetaxel Plus Prednisone or Mitoxantrone Plus Prednisone for Advanced Prostate Cancer Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1