Juri Taborri, Beatrice Stocchi, G. Calabrò, S. Rossi
{"title":"Repeatability and reproducibility in the breathability measurement of surgical masks","authors":"Juri Taborri, Beatrice Stocchi, G. Calabrò, S. Rossi","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA52024.2021.9478732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pandemic COVID-19 is still requiring several countermeasures to adopted in order to decrease the virus spread. Among others, face masks have shown their potentiality to reduce the person-to-person transmission. For this reason, several research groups and/or industries focused their supply chain in the production of innovative materials for the face mask design. Considering the surgical mask, several parameters have to be checked before their commercialization, as for example the breathability. This study aims at evaluating the repeatability and reproducibility of the breathability measurement in surgical masks, and at assessing the effects induced by the selected measurement points on the mask. Three samples for each type I, II and IIR masks were tested within the experimental protocol. Breathability was measured by following the UNI EN 14683:2019. Fifteen measurement points were identified for each mask and the measure was repeated five times per each point. Standard deviation across the repeated measures on the single point and across the different tested areas were used to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the procedure, respectively. The measurement uncertainty was also computed. In addition, in order to verify the effects induced by the selection of five points out the available fifteen, as requested by the UNI EN 14683:2019, all combinations of points were tested. Results showed a high value of reproducibility error, leading to the consideration that different areas of the same mask are characterized by different values of breathability. Thus, the selection of the five measurement points to perform the breathability measurement according to the standard is a crucial aspect that can influence the result of mask compliance. The results of the present paper could provide useful information for the standardization of the breathability measurement.","PeriodicalId":429222,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA52024.2021.9478732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
The pandemic COVID-19 is still requiring several countermeasures to adopted in order to decrease the virus spread. Among others, face masks have shown their potentiality to reduce the person-to-person transmission. For this reason, several research groups and/or industries focused their supply chain in the production of innovative materials for the face mask design. Considering the surgical mask, several parameters have to be checked before their commercialization, as for example the breathability. This study aims at evaluating the repeatability and reproducibility of the breathability measurement in surgical masks, and at assessing the effects induced by the selected measurement points on the mask. Three samples for each type I, II and IIR masks were tested within the experimental protocol. Breathability was measured by following the UNI EN 14683:2019. Fifteen measurement points were identified for each mask and the measure was repeated five times per each point. Standard deviation across the repeated measures on the single point and across the different tested areas were used to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the procedure, respectively. The measurement uncertainty was also computed. In addition, in order to verify the effects induced by the selection of five points out the available fifteen, as requested by the UNI EN 14683:2019, all combinations of points were tested. Results showed a high value of reproducibility error, leading to the consideration that different areas of the same mask are characterized by different values of breathability. Thus, the selection of the five measurement points to perform the breathability measurement according to the standard is a crucial aspect that can influence the result of mask compliance. The results of the present paper could provide useful information for the standardization of the breathability measurement.
COVID-19大流行仍需要采取若干对策,以减少病毒传播。除其他外,口罩已显示出减少人际传播的潜力。出于这个原因,一些研究小组和/或行业将其供应链重点放在生产用于口罩设计的创新材料上。考虑到外科口罩,在其商业化之前必须检查几个参数,例如透气性。本研究旨在评估外科口罩透气性测量的可重复性和再现性,并评估所选测点对口罩的影响。根据实验方案对I型、II型和IIR型口罩各3个样本进行检测。透气性按照UNI EN 14683:2019进行测量。每个掩模确定15个测量点,每个测量点重复测量5次。在单点和不同测试区域重复测量的标准偏差分别用于评估该程序的重复性和再现性。计算了测量不确定度。此外,根据UNI EN 14683:2019的要求,为了验证从可用的15个点中选择5个点所引起的效果,对所有点的组合进行了测试。结果显示重复性误差值较高,导致考虑到同一口罩的不同区域具有不同的透气性值。因此,根据标准选择五个测点进行透气性测量是影响口罩符合性结果的关键方面。本文的研究结果可为透气性测量的标准化提供参考。