Risk Perception of Building Fires in Belgrade

V. Cvetković
{"title":"Risk Perception of Building Fires in Belgrade","authors":"V. Cvetković","doi":"10.18485/IJDRM.2019.1.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting from the frequency and seriousness of fire in residential buildings in the area of Belgrade, this paper presents the results of research on the perception of citizens’ risks of fires in residential buildings. A series of 322 face-to-face interviews were conducted at the beginning of 2017 in Belgrade. The results of multivariate regressions of risk perception of building fires show that the most important predictor of perceived risk of building fires is fear, age, employment status, income level, and marital status. The remaining variables (e.g., gender, education level, previous experience) did not have a significant impact. Respondents who have fear, are married, have higher income, and elderly people perceive the higher level of risk in relation to those who have no fear, live alone, have lower incomes and younger persons. The results of the research can beused to improve the level of safety of citizens by raising their awareness of the risks of fires in housing facilities by designing and using appropriate educational programs and campaigns.","PeriodicalId":365882,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disaster Risk Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disaster Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/IJDRM.2019.1.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Starting from the frequency and seriousness of fire in residential buildings in the area of Belgrade, this paper presents the results of research on the perception of citizens’ risks of fires in residential buildings. A series of 322 face-to-face interviews were conducted at the beginning of 2017 in Belgrade. The results of multivariate regressions of risk perception of building fires show that the most important predictor of perceived risk of building fires is fear, age, employment status, income level, and marital status. The remaining variables (e.g., gender, education level, previous experience) did not have a significant impact. Respondents who have fear, are married, have higher income, and elderly people perceive the higher level of risk in relation to those who have no fear, live alone, have lower incomes and younger persons. The results of the research can beused to improve the level of safety of citizens by raising their awareness of the risks of fires in housing facilities by designing and using appropriate educational programs and campaigns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝尔格莱德建筑火灾的风险认知
本文从贝尔格莱德地区居住建筑火灾发生的频率和严重程度出发,提出了市民对居住建筑火灾风险认知的研究结果。2017年初在贝尔格莱德进行了322次面对面访谈。建筑火灾风险感知的多元回归结果表明,恐惧、年龄、就业状况、收入水平和婚姻状况是建筑火灾风险感知的最重要预测因子。其余变量(如性别、教育水平、以前的经验)没有显著影响。有恐惧、已婚、收入较高和老年人的受访者认为,与那些没有恐惧、独居、收入较低和年轻人相比,风险水平更高。研究结果可以通过设计和使用适当的教育计划和活动来提高公民对住房设施火灾风险的认识,从而提高公民的安全水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Earthquake Risk Perception in Belgrade: Implications for Disaster Risk Management Probabilistic Rainfall Thresholds for Shallow Landslides Initiation – A Case Study from the Nilgiris District, Western Ghats, India Earthquake Preparedness: A Social Media Fit Perspective to Accessing and Disseminating Earthquake Information Disaster Governance and Community Resilience: The Law and the Role of SDMAs Demographic, Socio-Economic and Phycological Perspective of Risk Perception from Disasters Caused by Floods: Case Study Belgrade
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1