{"title":"Roots of (and Solutions to) our Ecological Crisis. A Humanistic Perspective","authors":"Ryszard F. Sadowski","doi":"10.35534/ecolciviliz.2023.10001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Research into the sources of contemporary ecological crisis as well as ways to overcome it has been conducted for several decades. Rich academic literature provides numerous attempts to identify the causes of the crisis and its solutions. The ecological crisis is extremely complex and variously conditioned. Therefore, I focus on determining only two sources of the crisis and, respectively, two solutions. Since the late 1960s, monotheistic religions, Christianity in particular, have been made responsible for the environmental crisis. Christianity is accused of forwarding two theses which are harmful to the environment: 1. The sole purpose of nature is to serve man. 2. By God’s will, man is endowed with unlimited power over nature. I attempt to overcome this understanding of the source of the crisis by showing the interpretation of the Bible which contradicts the above-mentioned theses. Moreover, I show “the ecological potential” of the Judeo-Christian and Muslim traditions. As the second source of the crisis I indicate modern thought: 1. Man’s alienation from nature as the result of the Cartesian division of reality into res cogitans and res extensa . 2. Francis Bacon’s program: the study of nature is the task of natural sciences alone; nature is devoid of value in itself. 3. The mathematization of nature made it possible for the natural and technical sciences to develop rapidly, which contributed to the industrial revolution. I look for an antidote to this cause of the crisis in Klaus M. Meyer-Abich’s idea of man’s peace with nature which he developed as part of the practical philosophy of nature. I believe that revealing our inseparable bond with nature and showing compassion towards nature may help overcome the destructive consequences of modern thought.","PeriodicalId":244043,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Civilization","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Civilization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35534/ecolciviliz.2023.10001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
: Research into the sources of contemporary ecological crisis as well as ways to overcome it has been conducted for several decades. Rich academic literature provides numerous attempts to identify the causes of the crisis and its solutions. The ecological crisis is extremely complex and variously conditioned. Therefore, I focus on determining only two sources of the crisis and, respectively, two solutions. Since the late 1960s, monotheistic religions, Christianity in particular, have been made responsible for the environmental crisis. Christianity is accused of forwarding two theses which are harmful to the environment: 1. The sole purpose of nature is to serve man. 2. By God’s will, man is endowed with unlimited power over nature. I attempt to overcome this understanding of the source of the crisis by showing the interpretation of the Bible which contradicts the above-mentioned theses. Moreover, I show “the ecological potential” of the Judeo-Christian and Muslim traditions. As the second source of the crisis I indicate modern thought: 1. Man’s alienation from nature as the result of the Cartesian division of reality into res cogitans and res extensa . 2. Francis Bacon’s program: the study of nature is the task of natural sciences alone; nature is devoid of value in itself. 3. The mathematization of nature made it possible for the natural and technical sciences to develop rapidly, which contributed to the industrial revolution. I look for an antidote to this cause of the crisis in Klaus M. Meyer-Abich’s idea of man’s peace with nature which he developed as part of the practical philosophy of nature. I believe that revealing our inseparable bond with nature and showing compassion towards nature may help overcome the destructive consequences of modern thought.
对当代生态危机的根源和克服方法的研究已经进行了几十年。丰富的学术文献提供了许多尝试,以确定危机的原因及其解决方案。生态危机是极其复杂的,条件是多种多样的。因此,我着重于确定危机的两个根源,并分别提出两个解决方案。自20世纪60年代末以来,一神论宗教,特别是基督教,被认为对环境危机负有责任。基督教被指责提出了两个对环境有害的论点:1。大自然的唯一目的是为人类服务。2. 根据上帝的意志,人类被赋予了超越自然的无限力量。我试图通过展示与上述论点相矛盾的圣经解释来克服对危机根源的这种理解。此外,我还展示了犹太教-基督教和穆斯林传统的“生态潜力”。作为危机的第二个来源,我指出现代思想:1。人与自然的异化是笛卡儿将现实划分为“认知者”和“外延者”的结果。2. 弗朗西斯·培根的纲领:研究自然是自然科学的任务;自然本身没有价值。3.对自然的数学化使自然科学和技术科学得以迅速发展,从而促成了工业革命。我在Klaus M. Meyer-Abich关于人类与自然和平的观点中寻找解决危机的方法,他将这一观点发展为自然实践哲学的一部分。我相信,揭示我们与自然密不可分的联系,对自然表示同情,可能有助于克服现代思想的破坏性后果。