Use of Techscaffold to Foster Teachers’ Decision-making Processes to Support Technology Integration

R. Beach, John M. Scott, Greg Klotz
{"title":"Use of Techscaffold to Foster Teachers’ Decision-making Processes to Support Technology Integration","authors":"R. Beach, John M. Scott, Greg Klotz","doi":"10.1108/S2048-045820180000009014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structured Abstract \nPurpose – To describe the use of the software platform, TechScaffold, for use in teacher education to provide pre-service and in-service teachers with decision-making heuristics to select apps based on formulation of their instructional purposes for using those apps; participate in a community designed to foster knowledge and experience about effective, purposeful uses of apps; and share project reports to illustrate the use of apps to achieve certain learning objectives. \n \nDesign – The authors draw on research related to decision-making associated with purposeful uses of apps as well as analysis of the limitations of similar instructional design tools to develop features for TechScaffold. They sought to scaffold teachers’ decision-making through users formulating open-ended responses to queries with responses matched against a database of apps identified according to platform, purpose, grade level, difficulty, and cost, as well as ways for users to participate as members of a community to share projects illustrating uses of apps. The authors also obtained feedback regarding the potential usability and value of TechScaffold. \n \nFindings – Given research indicating the importance of scaffolding decision-making processes regarding uses of apps, feedback from users indicated that they perceive TechScaffold as a useful tool within the context of teacher education as well as for professional development in schools to foster effective decision-making associated with purposeful uses of apps. \n \nPractical Implications – Teacher educators can employ scaffolding activities to help pre-service and in-service teachers make decisions regarding productive uses of apps through their open-ended formulation of certain purposes through use of a tool such as TechScaffold.","PeriodicalId":309500,"journal":{"name":"Best Practices in Teaching Digital Literacies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practices in Teaching Digital Literacies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S2048-045820180000009014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Structured Abstract Purpose – To describe the use of the software platform, TechScaffold, for use in teacher education to provide pre-service and in-service teachers with decision-making heuristics to select apps based on formulation of their instructional purposes for using those apps; participate in a community designed to foster knowledge and experience about effective, purposeful uses of apps; and share project reports to illustrate the use of apps to achieve certain learning objectives. Design – The authors draw on research related to decision-making associated with purposeful uses of apps as well as analysis of the limitations of similar instructional design tools to develop features for TechScaffold. They sought to scaffold teachers’ decision-making through users formulating open-ended responses to queries with responses matched against a database of apps identified according to platform, purpose, grade level, difficulty, and cost, as well as ways for users to participate as members of a community to share projects illustrating uses of apps. The authors also obtained feedback regarding the potential usability and value of TechScaffold. Findings – Given research indicating the importance of scaffolding decision-making processes regarding uses of apps, feedback from users indicated that they perceive TechScaffold as a useful tool within the context of teacher education as well as for professional development in schools to foster effective decision-making associated with purposeful uses of apps. Practical Implications – Teacher educators can employ scaffolding activities to help pre-service and in-service teachers make decisions regarding productive uses of apps through their open-ended formulation of certain purposes through use of a tool such as TechScaffold.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用技术脚手架促进教师决策过程以支持技术整合
目的-描述软件平台TechScaffold的使用,用于教师教育,为职前和在职教师提供决策启发式,以根据使用这些应用程序的教学目的的制定选择应用程序;参与一个旨在培养有效、有目的使用应用程序的知识和经验的社区;并分享项目报告,以说明如何使用应用程序来实现某些学习目标。设计-作者借鉴了与有目的使用应用程序相关的决策研究,以及分析了类似教学设计工具的局限性,以开发TechScaffold的功能。他们试图通过用户对问题提出开放式的回答,并将这些回答与根据平台、目的、年级水平、难度和成本确定的应用程序数据库相匹配,以及用户作为社区成员参与分享说明应用程序使用的项目的方式,来指导教师的决策。作者还获得了关于TechScaffold潜在可用性和价值的反馈。研究结果-鉴于研究表明脚手架决策过程在应用程序使用方面的重要性,来自用户的反馈表明,他们认为TechScaffold是教师教育背景下的有用工具,也是学校专业发展的有用工具,可以促进与有目的使用应用程序相关的有效决策。实际意义——教师教育工作者可以使用脚手架活动,帮助职前和在职教师通过使用TechScaffold等工具,通过他们对某些目的的开放式制定,做出有关有效使用应用程序的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Beginning, Acting, Telling (Bat) Model: A Visual Framework for Teaching Digital Literacy through Inquiry and Information Seeking Language Today: Promoting Ela Content Area Learning through Collaboratively Engaged Social Media Practice Only One iPad: Preparing Pre-service Teachers to Teach Digital Literacies in Under-resourced Elementary Schools Tactile Picture Book Making and Multimodal Composition: Students Design for Equity in English Language Arts Pre-service Teachers’ Use of Multimodal Text Sets and Technology in Teaching Reading: Lessons Learned from a Design-Based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1