Деякі проблеми визначення поняття і змісту санкцій у міжнародному публічному праві

Taras Shapoval
{"title":"Деякі проблеми визначення поняття і змісту санкцій у міжнародному публічному праві","authors":"Taras Shapoval","doi":"10.30970/VIR.2016.38.0.2436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper addresses concept, essence and legal nature of property and property right within the context of international public law. The need to determine international public law aspects of property right regulation is based on protection of property right under international treaties. Since the pacta sunt servanda rule is universally upheld, no one contests the proposition that a state must observe its treaty obligations with regard to the property interests of foreigners. It is emphasized that for a long time international practice and doctrine attributed regulatory and protection questions regarding property right protection of foreigners to domestic jurisdiction of states. A chronological approach to the international human rights instruments that proclaim the right to property must start with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which in 1948 proclaimed in its Article 17 that «everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others» and that «no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property». Article also contains analysis of certain judgments of the European Court of Justice and its interpretation of «property right» concept. Key words: international public law; property right; property; Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms dated 1950; Protocol 1 to Convention; case law; European Court of Justice.","PeriodicalId":221472,"journal":{"name":"ЗАКАРПАТСЬКІ ПРАВОВІ ЧИТАННЯ. ПРАВО ЯК ІНСТРУМЕНТ СТІЙКОСТІ ТА РОЗВИТКУ В УМОВАХ СУЧАСНИХ ЦИВІЛІЗАЦІЙНИХ ВИКЛИКІВ. ЧАСТИНА 2","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ЗАКАРПАТСЬКІ ПРАВОВІ ЧИТАННЯ. ПРАВО ЯК ІНСТРУМЕНТ СТІЙКОСТІ ТА РОЗВИТКУ В УМОВАХ СУЧАСНИХ ЦИВІЛІЗАЦІЙНИХ ВИКЛИКІВ. ЧАСТИНА 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30970/VIR.2016.38.0.2436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper addresses concept, essence and legal nature of property and property right within the context of international public law. The need to determine international public law aspects of property right regulation is based on protection of property right under international treaties. Since the pacta sunt servanda rule is universally upheld, no one contests the proposition that a state must observe its treaty obligations with regard to the property interests of foreigners. It is emphasized that for a long time international practice and doctrine attributed regulatory and protection questions regarding property right protection of foreigners to domestic jurisdiction of states. A chronological approach to the international human rights instruments that proclaim the right to property must start with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which in 1948 proclaimed in its Article 17 that «everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others» and that «no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property». Article also contains analysis of certain judgments of the European Court of Justice and its interpretation of «property right» concept. Key words: international public law; property right; property; Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms dated 1950; Protocol 1 to Convention; case law; European Court of Justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文论述了国际公法背景下财产和财产权的概念、本质和法律性质。确定产权管理的国际公法方面的必要性是基于国际条约对产权的保护。既然“契约必须遵守”原则得到普遍支持,那么就没有人对一国必须遵守其关于外国人财产利益的条约义务这一主张提出异议。文章强调,长期以来,国际实践和理论将外国人产权保护的监管和保护问题归结为国家的国内管辖问题。按照时间顺序来研究宣布财产权的国际人权文书必须从《世界人权宣言》开始,该宣言于1948年在其第17条中宣布“人人有权单独拥有财产以及与他人共同拥有财产”,“任何人的财产不得任意剥夺”。文章还分析了欧洲法院的某些判决及其对“产权”概念的解释。关键词:国际公法;产权;财产;1950年《人权和基本自由公约》;公约第一号议定书;判例法;欧洲法院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Деякі проблеми визначення поняття і змісту санкцій у міжнародному публічному праві Розбудова правоохоронними органами та військовими формуваннями системи захисту інформаційної безпеки у зоні проведення антитерористичної операції на Сході України Принцип рівноправності сторін цивільного процесу Independence of constitutional justice bodies as a prerequisite for the rule of law Korelacja pojęć «prawa i zwyczaje wojenne» oraz «środki i metody prowadzenia wojny» w ustawodawstwie międzynarodowym i krajowym
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1