The protection of biodiversity in the new global agreement post-2020

Maria Cecília de Lima, Tarin Mont´Alverne
{"title":"The protection of biodiversity in the new global agreement post-2020","authors":"Maria Cecília de Lima, Tarin Mont´Alverne","doi":"10.51799/2763-8685v2n2010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the Proposal for a Regulation on Nature Restoration (PRNR) of the European Parliament and the Council published on June 22, 2022, which brings proposals for legally binding targets on nature restoration, within the context of a new post-2020 legal framework for biodiversity protection. The research is made based on the European Ecological Pact and its contribution to climate change mitigation, specifically its EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030 (EBIO), as well as from the assessment of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the Aichi Targets and what has been discussed for the COP-15. Then, the coordination between the EU biodiversity governance framework and the post-2020 framework proposed by the Parties to the CBD is examined. It starts with the following problem questions: Have the actions of the European Union (EU) been relevant to the fulfillment of the commitments assumed in its EBIO in the context of the PEE? Will the recently published PRRN help in the discussions surrounding a possible new global agreement on biodiversity after COP-15? Such questions will guide, respectively, topic 1 and topic 2. The methodology of the research will be deductive, descriptive and exploratory, through literature and documental analysis. As results, it was found that there was a delay in fulfilling the EBIO commitments. However, there was progress regarding the proposal of legally binding targets in the PRNR. A new global agreement for biodiversity is being outlined in the meetings for COP-15, and, despite the ambitious objectives, there is lack of political will and high-level leadership to close the most important points in time for the 2022 Conference. The study showed that efforts to conserve biodiversity cannot leave traditional communities aside throughout the processes of change.","PeriodicalId":171261,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of European Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51799/2763-8685v2n2010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the Proposal for a Regulation on Nature Restoration (PRNR) of the European Parliament and the Council published on June 22, 2022, which brings proposals for legally binding targets on nature restoration, within the context of a new post-2020 legal framework for biodiversity protection. The research is made based on the European Ecological Pact and its contribution to climate change mitigation, specifically its EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030 (EBIO), as well as from the assessment of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the Aichi Targets and what has been discussed for the COP-15. Then, the coordination between the EU biodiversity governance framework and the post-2020 framework proposed by the Parties to the CBD is examined. It starts with the following problem questions: Have the actions of the European Union (EU) been relevant to the fulfillment of the commitments assumed in its EBIO in the context of the PEE? Will the recently published PRRN help in the discussions surrounding a possible new global agreement on biodiversity after COP-15? Such questions will guide, respectively, topic 1 and topic 2. The methodology of the research will be deductive, descriptive and exploratory, through literature and documental analysis. As results, it was found that there was a delay in fulfilling the EBIO commitments. However, there was progress regarding the proposal of legally binding targets in the PRNR. A new global agreement for biodiversity is being outlined in the meetings for COP-15, and, despite the ambitious objectives, there is lack of political will and high-level leadership to close the most important points in time for the 2022 Conference. The study showed that efforts to conserve biodiversity cannot leave traditional communities aside throughout the processes of change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2020年后新全球协议中的生物多样性保护
本研究旨在分析欧洲议会和理事会于2022年6月22日发布的《自然恢复条例提案》(PRNR),该提案在新的2020年后生物多样性保护法律框架的背景下提出了具有法律约束力的自然恢复目标。这项研究是基于《欧洲生态公约》及其对减缓气候变化的贡献,特别是其《欧盟2030年生物多样性战略》(EBIO),以及对《生物多样性公约》(CBD)、爱知目标和缔约方会议第十五次会议讨论内容的评估。然后,对欧盟生物多样性治理框架与《生物多样性公约》缔约方提出的2020年后框架的协调性进行了研究。它从以下问题开始:欧洲联盟(EU)的行动是否与在PEE背景下履行其EBIO中所承担的承诺有关?最近发表的PRRN是否有助于围绕cop15之后可能达成的新的全球生物多样性协议的讨论?这些问题将分别指导主题1和主题2。研究方法将是演绎,描述和探索性,通过文献和文献分析。结果发现,在履行环境生态系统承诺方面出现了拖延。但是,关于在PRNR中提出具有法律约束力的指标的建议取得了进展。在cop15会议上,一项新的全球生物多样性协议正在被概述,尽管目标雄心勃勃,但缺乏政治意愿和高层领导来完成2022年会议最重要的时间点。这项研究表明,保护生物多样性的努力不能在整个变化过程中把传统社区撇在一边。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Justiça e redes sociais: modelos comparados de regulamentação da liberdade de expressão dos Magistrados entre tutela dos direitos fundamentais e estado de direito Development of artificial intelligence in the AI-Mandamus project: elements of developed know-how The biometric habeas data in the digital and algorithmic era in the European Union Solidarity and the protection of migrants under European Union law Data protection in Mercosur: current situation, perspectives and project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1