Comparative study of use of dry and wet temporalis fascia Graft in type-1 Tympanoplasty

K. Naveen, R. Jyothiswarup, M. Mohan, M. S. Roy, P. Sanjana
{"title":"Comparative study of use of dry and wet temporalis fascia Graft in type-1 Tympanoplasty","authors":"K. Naveen, R. Jyothiswarup, M. Mohan, M. S. Roy, P. Sanjana","doi":"10.46319/rjmahs.2019.v02i02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tympanoplasty is a procedure to eradicate disease in the middle ear and to reconstruct the hearing mechanism. Objectives: To assess the graft placement time, surgical and audiological improvement and to estimate the fibroblast count in dry and wet temporalis fascia. Materials & Methods: Out of 50 patients, two groups comprising of 25 patients each underwent type 1 tympanoplasty using dry and wet graft respectively. A comparative analysis was done on the graft placement time, fibroblast count and hearing improvement postoperatively between the two groups. Results: Complete graft uptake was seen in 96% patients in Wet graft group and 100% patients in Dry graft group. Majority of wet grafting was done within 10-12 minutes compared to dry grafting which was done within 3-6 minutes. Even though Fibroblast count was increased in wet graft tissue (88%) when compared with dry graft tissue (52%), surgical outcomes were similar for dry and wet grafting. We observed that there was statistically insignificant difference between the success rates of graft up take and hearing improvement on both groups. Conclusion: There is equal success rates, in terms of graft up take and hearing improvement, whether it is dry or wet temporalis fascia grafting, but Graft placement time will be less in dry grafting as compared to wet grafting.","PeriodicalId":121001,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Medical and Allied Health Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Medical and Allied Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46319/rjmahs.2019.v02i02.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Tympanoplasty is a procedure to eradicate disease in the middle ear and to reconstruct the hearing mechanism. Objectives: To assess the graft placement time, surgical and audiological improvement and to estimate the fibroblast count in dry and wet temporalis fascia. Materials & Methods: Out of 50 patients, two groups comprising of 25 patients each underwent type 1 tympanoplasty using dry and wet graft respectively. A comparative analysis was done on the graft placement time, fibroblast count and hearing improvement postoperatively between the two groups. Results: Complete graft uptake was seen in 96% patients in Wet graft group and 100% patients in Dry graft group. Majority of wet grafting was done within 10-12 minutes compared to dry grafting which was done within 3-6 minutes. Even though Fibroblast count was increased in wet graft tissue (88%) when compared with dry graft tissue (52%), surgical outcomes were similar for dry and wet grafting. We observed that there was statistically insignificant difference between the success rates of graft up take and hearing improvement on both groups. Conclusion: There is equal success rates, in terms of graft up take and hearing improvement, whether it is dry or wet temporalis fascia grafting, but Graft placement time will be less in dry grafting as compared to wet grafting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干、湿颞筋膜移植物在1型鼓室成形术中的应用对比研究
背景:鼓室成形术是一种根除中耳疾病和重建听力机制的手术。目的:评估移植物放置时间、手术和听力学改善情况,并评估干、湿颞筋膜成纤维细胞计数。材料与方法:50例患者中,两组各25例患者分别行1型鼓室成形术。比较分析两组植皮时间、成纤维细胞计数及术后听力改善情况。结果:湿移植组移植片完全摄取率96%,干移植片完全摄取率100%。大多数湿嫁接在10-12分钟内完成,而干嫁接在3-6分钟内完成。尽管湿移植组织的成纤维细胞计数(88%)比干移植组织(52%)增加,但干移植和湿移植的手术结果相似。我们观察到两组移植成功率和听力改善的差异无统计学意义。结论:干式和湿式颞筋膜植入术在补片和改善听力方面成功率相等,但干式植入术植入术时间比湿式植入术短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intramedullary Chondrosarcoma of Proximal Humerus Study of level of termination of right coronary artery and its dominance in human cadaveric heart specimens Deep axillary arch muscle; a rare muscular variation Study of risk factors for diabetes using Indian diabetic risk score in Tumkur A case report- Maxillary Sinus Cholesteatoma mimicking as Sinus Malignancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1