David W. Blackwell, Vladimir Kotomin, Drew B. Winters
{"title":"Benefits from Lending Relationships in Public Debt Markets: Empirical Evidence from the Commercial Paper Market","authors":"David W. Blackwell, Vladimir Kotomin, Drew B. Winters","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2138514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The global financial crisis has brought attention to the money markets with specific discussions related to their primary characteristics: low credit risk and high liquidity. As the first signs of the crisis were felt in the money markets in the summer of 2007, front-page articles in the Wall Street Journal discussed how investors have fled commercial paper for the safety of Treasury bills as the Federal Reserve pumped billions of dollars of additional liquidity in the market. Countrywide Financial Corporation (a large nationwide mortgage lender) was a prime example of the impact of the crisis on the commercial paper market as it drew on its bank lines of credit when it was unable to raise the necessary funds in the commercial paper market. These articles raise the question of how borrowers in the commercial paper market maintain access to credit during liquidity squeezes. Diamond (1989) argues that borrowers develop reputation through repeated successful debt transactions with a bank, which allows them to reduce their loan rate over time. Diamond (1989) spawned a body of empirical literature on the value of lending relationships, with the following being representative examples. Petersen and Rajan (1994) find that an ongoing relationship with a lender increases the amount of debt available to the borrower. Berger and Udell (1995) find that lending relationships reduce the rate charged to the borrower on a line of credit and reduce the need for collateral to support the line. Blackwell and Winters (1997) also find that lending relationships reduce the rate charged on lines of credit and reduce the monitoring efforts of the lender. Lending relationships may benefit lenders, too. Yasuda (2005) finds that bank relationships have positive and significant effects on a firm's underwriter choice, and Bharath et al. (2007) find that relationship lenders' informational advantage allows them to sell more information-sensitive products to its borrowers. Financial intermediaries such as banks do not suffer from lack of motivation to monitor their borrowers (as public debt market participants may) and thus are considered superior information producers and monitors. Diamond (1991) extends Diamond (1989) and argues that borrowers who develop sufficient reputation through successful transactions with a bank can leave the intermediated market and borrow directly in the public debt markets. Diamond (1991) does not discuss whether firms that borrow in the public debt markets can benefit from developing relationships with lenders in these markets. That is, can a borrower in a public debt market increase its access to debt and/or decrease its interest rate on debt by developing direct relationships with lenders? We examine this question by testing for the benefits from direct borrower-lender relationships in the public debt market for commercial paper (CP). We take advantage of a well-defined year-end preferred habitat for liquidity (liquidity squeeze) (see Griffiths and Winters 2005a) in CP to examine whether a direct relationship with a CP purchaser (lender) provides better access to credit. We find that the year-end rate increase from the liquidity squeeze is smaller in magnitude and shorter in duration in directly placed than in dealer-placed CP. The smaller size and shorter duration of the squeeze in the directly placed CP market is consistent with the benefits of relationship lending. That is, borrowers who have direct relationships with their lenders are likely to have access to more debt at lower interest rates than other borrowers during periods of constrained liquidity. Our results may be compared to recent research findings on investment banking relationships for public debt issuers. (1) However, investment banks are not lenders in these studies. We examine the value of borrower-lender relationships in public debt markets and find evidence to support the value of relationships when liquidity is constrained. …","PeriodicalId":165017,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2138514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction The global financial crisis has brought attention to the money markets with specific discussions related to their primary characteristics: low credit risk and high liquidity. As the first signs of the crisis were felt in the money markets in the summer of 2007, front-page articles in the Wall Street Journal discussed how investors have fled commercial paper for the safety of Treasury bills as the Federal Reserve pumped billions of dollars of additional liquidity in the market. Countrywide Financial Corporation (a large nationwide mortgage lender) was a prime example of the impact of the crisis on the commercial paper market as it drew on its bank lines of credit when it was unable to raise the necessary funds in the commercial paper market. These articles raise the question of how borrowers in the commercial paper market maintain access to credit during liquidity squeezes. Diamond (1989) argues that borrowers develop reputation through repeated successful debt transactions with a bank, which allows them to reduce their loan rate over time. Diamond (1989) spawned a body of empirical literature on the value of lending relationships, with the following being representative examples. Petersen and Rajan (1994) find that an ongoing relationship with a lender increases the amount of debt available to the borrower. Berger and Udell (1995) find that lending relationships reduce the rate charged to the borrower on a line of credit and reduce the need for collateral to support the line. Blackwell and Winters (1997) also find that lending relationships reduce the rate charged on lines of credit and reduce the monitoring efforts of the lender. Lending relationships may benefit lenders, too. Yasuda (2005) finds that bank relationships have positive and significant effects on a firm's underwriter choice, and Bharath et al. (2007) find that relationship lenders' informational advantage allows them to sell more information-sensitive products to its borrowers. Financial intermediaries such as banks do not suffer from lack of motivation to monitor their borrowers (as public debt market participants may) and thus are considered superior information producers and monitors. Diamond (1991) extends Diamond (1989) and argues that borrowers who develop sufficient reputation through successful transactions with a bank can leave the intermediated market and borrow directly in the public debt markets. Diamond (1991) does not discuss whether firms that borrow in the public debt markets can benefit from developing relationships with lenders in these markets. That is, can a borrower in a public debt market increase its access to debt and/or decrease its interest rate on debt by developing direct relationships with lenders? We examine this question by testing for the benefits from direct borrower-lender relationships in the public debt market for commercial paper (CP). We take advantage of a well-defined year-end preferred habitat for liquidity (liquidity squeeze) (see Griffiths and Winters 2005a) in CP to examine whether a direct relationship with a CP purchaser (lender) provides better access to credit. We find that the year-end rate increase from the liquidity squeeze is smaller in magnitude and shorter in duration in directly placed than in dealer-placed CP. The smaller size and shorter duration of the squeeze in the directly placed CP market is consistent with the benefits of relationship lending. That is, borrowers who have direct relationships with their lenders are likely to have access to more debt at lower interest rates than other borrowers during periods of constrained liquidity. Our results may be compared to recent research findings on investment banking relationships for public debt issuers. (1) However, investment banks are not lenders in these studies. We examine the value of borrower-lender relationships in public debt markets and find evidence to support the value of relationships when liquidity is constrained. …
全球金融危机引起了人们对货币市场的关注,具体讨论了货币市场的主要特征:低信用风险和高流动性。2007年夏天,当金融危机的最初迹象在货币市场显现出来时,《华尔街日报》(Wall Street Journal)的头版文章讨论了随着美联储(Federal Reserve)向市场注入数十亿美元的额外流动性,投资者如何逃离商业票据,转向安全的国库券。全国金融公司(一家大型全国性抵押贷款机构)是危机对商业票据市场影响的一个典型例子,因为当它无法在商业票据市场筹集到必要的资金时,它利用了银行的信贷额度。这些文章提出了一个问题:在流动性紧缩时期,商业票据市场的借款人如何保持获得信贷的渠道?戴蒙德(1989)认为,借款人通过与银行多次成功的债务交易来建立声誉,这使他们能够随着时间的推移降低贷款利率。Diamond(1989)产生了大量关于借贷关系价值的实证文献,以下是代表性的例子。Petersen和Rajan(1994)发现,与贷方的持续关系增加了借款人可获得的债务金额。Berger和Udell(1995)发现,借贷关系降低了借款人在信贷额度上收取的利率,并减少了对担保品的需求。Blackwell和Winters(1997)还发现,贷款关系降低了对信贷额度收取的利率,减少了贷款人的监控力度。贷款关系也可能使贷款人受益。Yasuda(2005)发现,银行关系对企业的承销商选择有积极而显著的影响,Bharath等人(2007)发现,关系贷款人的信息优势使他们能够向借款人销售更多的信息敏感产品。银行等金融中介机构不会缺乏监督借款人的动机(公共债务市场参与者可能会这样),因此被认为是优秀的信息生产者和监督者。Diamond(1991)扩展了Diamond(1989)的观点,认为通过与银行的成功交易建立足够声誉的借款人可以离开中介市场,直接在公共债务市场上借款。戴蒙德(1991)没有讨论在公共债务市场上借款的公司是否能从与这些市场上的贷方发展关系中受益。也就是说,公共债务市场上的借款人能否通过与贷方建立直接关系来增加其获得债务的机会和/或降低其债务利率?我们通过测试商业票据(CP)公共债务市场中直接借款人-贷款人关系的收益来检验这个问题。我们利用商业票据中明确定义的年终流动性首选栖息地(流动性紧缩)(见Griffiths和Winters 2005)来检查与商业票据购买者(贷方)的直接关系是否提供了更好的信贷渠道。我们发现,与交易商放置的商业票据相比,直接放置的商业票据市场的流动性紧缩导致的年末利率上升幅度较小,持续时间较短。直接放置商业票据市场的流动性紧缩规模较小,持续时间较短,这与关系借贷的好处是一致的。也就是说,在流动性受限的时期,与贷款人有直接关系的借款人可能比其他借款人有机会以更低的利率获得更多的债务。我们的研究结果可以与最近关于公共债务发行人投资银行关系的研究结果进行比较。(1)然而,在这些研究中,投资银行不是贷款人。我们研究了公共债务市场中借款人-贷款人关系的价值,并找到证据支持流动性受限时关系的价值。…