ANALISIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA GRATIFIKASI (Studi Putusan Nomor 18/Pid.Sus-TPK/2017/PN.Tjk)

Erniyati Erniyati, D. Novrian Syahputra, Riko Herdiansah
{"title":"ANALISIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA GRATIFIKASI (Studi Putusan Nomor 18/Pid.Sus-TPK/2017/PN.Tjk)","authors":"Erniyati Erniyati, D. Novrian Syahputra, Riko Herdiansah","doi":"10.37090/keadilan.v20i2.728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social phenomenon is still going on cases of criminal gratification that need to be optimized law enforcement in the field of the field. One of them is gratification crime of making land sale and purchase documents in Case Number: 18 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN.Tjk. The results of the study and discussion show that the factors causing the perpetrators of gratification crime on Decision Case Number 18 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN.Tjk include: intrinsic and extrinsic factors, lack of supervision of the use of funds, the gap to mark up all costs projects, lack of accountability and transparency of budget usage, lack of community control, nepotism-influenced governance structures. Criminal liability of perpetrators of gratification crime based on Case Decision Number 18 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN.Tjk implemented by punishment against Defendant. The judges shall impose a 1 (one) year imprisonment and a fine of Rp 50,000,000.00 (five million rupiahs) on the condition that the unpaid penalty may be replaced by a one-month imprisonment. Legal status of evidence against gratification crime pursuant to Decision Case Number 18 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN.Tjk that is in accordance with the court decision that the evidence in the form of document of evidence proof letter remain attached in file case, to the Defendant while goods butki Cash Rp. 25.000.000, - shall be returned to the eligible as stated in Court Decision. \nKeywords: Criminal Responsibility, Crime, Gratification","PeriodicalId":143961,"journal":{"name":"Keadilan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Keadilan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37090/keadilan.v20i2.728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social phenomenon is still going on cases of criminal gratification that need to be optimized law enforcement in the field of the field. One of them is gratification crime of making land sale and purchase documents in Case Number: 18 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN.Tjk. The results of the study and discussion show that the factors causing the perpetrators of gratification crime on Decision Case Number 18 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN.Tjk include: intrinsic and extrinsic factors, lack of supervision of the use of funds, the gap to mark up all costs projects, lack of accountability and transparency of budget usage, lack of community control, nepotism-influenced governance structures. Criminal liability of perpetrators of gratification crime based on Case Decision Number 18 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN.Tjk implemented by punishment against Defendant. The judges shall impose a 1 (one) year imprisonment and a fine of Rp 50,000,000.00 (five million rupiahs) on the condition that the unpaid penalty may be replaced by a one-month imprisonment. Legal status of evidence against gratification crime pursuant to Decision Case Number 18 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN.Tjk that is in accordance with the court decision that the evidence in the form of document of evidence proof letter remain attached in file case, to the Defendant while goods butki Cash Rp. 25.000.000, - shall be returned to the eligible as stated in Court Decision. Keywords: Criminal Responsibility, Crime, Gratification
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对gradecision犯罪者的刑事责任分析(裁决编号18/Pid. su - tpk /2017/PN Tjk)
社会现象仍在继续,犯罪满足案件需要在执法领域进行优化。其中之一是案件号:18 / Pid的制作土地买卖文件受贿罪。su - tpk / 2017 / PN.Tjk。研究和讨论的结果表明,在判决案件号18 / Pid上,满足犯罪行为人的成因。su - tpk / 2017 / PN。这些因素包括:内在和外在因素、缺乏对资金使用的监督、对所有成本项目加价的差距、预算使用缺乏问责制和透明度、缺乏社区控制、裙带关系影响的治理结构。从18 / Pid号判决书看满足犯行为人的刑事责任。su - tpk / 2017 / PN。通过对被告的惩罚来实施Tjk。法官应判处1(1)年监禁和5000万卢比(500万卢比)的罚款,条件是可以用一个月的监禁代替未付的罚款。第18 / Pid号判案对贪欲罪证据的法律地位。su - tpk / 2017 / PN。根据法院判决,证据证明文件或证明函形式的证据仍以卷宗形式附属于被告,而货物(现金Rp. 25000.000)应退还给法院判决中规定的合格人员。关键词:刑事责任,犯罪,满足
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IMPLIKASI HUKUM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 20/PUU-XIV/ 2016 TERHADAP PEMBUKTIAN PERDATA DI INDONESIA PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA ILLEGAL LOGGING MELALUI PENDEKATAN PENCUCIAN UANG TANGGUNG GUGAT BALAI LELANG TERHADAP PENJUALAN OBJEK LELANG SECARA ONLINE KONVERGENSI HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA TERHADAP KOMUNIKASI BISNIS DI SEKTOR EKONOMI DIGITAL IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 55 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2018 TENTANG KEKARANTINAAN KESEHATAN PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 (STUDI KASUS KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1