Participants in Administrative Court Proceedings in Multi-Stakeholder Proceedings

Jakub Polanowski
{"title":"Participants in Administrative Court Proceedings in Multi-Stakeholder Proceedings","authors":"Jakub Polanowski","doi":"10.17951/ppa.2020.3.123-143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is conceptual in nature and addresses the application of the rules on the participation of participants in administrative court proceedings. The main thesis of the paper is based on the statement that a person who, as a party to administrative proceedings, was notified, pursuant to Art. 49a of the Administrative Procedure Code, of the activities of an authority by public announcement, may become a participant in administrative court proceedings after fulfilling the condition specified in Art. 33 § 1a of the Law on Administrative Courts Proceedings. The subsidiary thesis is that reasons of procedural efficiency require the adoption of such a limitation of the rights of the designated entities that will not infringe the essence of their right to a court and will not impede the exercise of that right by the parties and other participants to the proceedings. The purpose of this paper is to provide that Art. 49a of the Code of Administrative Procedure is one of the “special provisions” referred to in Art. 33 § 1a of the Law on Administrative Courts Proceedings. The reasoning adopted is based on the assumption that the interpretation of the above provisions should take into account both the requirements arising from the right of access to court and the right to be heard without unreasonable delay and the need to minimise the costs of proceedings. The described issue, based on national research, is of significant importance for practice and have not yet been discussed in more detail in the doctrine.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/ppa.2020.3.123-143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is conceptual in nature and addresses the application of the rules on the participation of participants in administrative court proceedings. The main thesis of the paper is based on the statement that a person who, as a party to administrative proceedings, was notified, pursuant to Art. 49a of the Administrative Procedure Code, of the activities of an authority by public announcement, may become a participant in administrative court proceedings after fulfilling the condition specified in Art. 33 § 1a of the Law on Administrative Courts Proceedings. The subsidiary thesis is that reasons of procedural efficiency require the adoption of such a limitation of the rights of the designated entities that will not infringe the essence of their right to a court and will not impede the exercise of that right by the parties and other participants to the proceedings. The purpose of this paper is to provide that Art. 49a of the Code of Administrative Procedure is one of the “special provisions” referred to in Art. 33 § 1a of the Law on Administrative Courts Proceedings. The reasoning adopted is based on the assumption that the interpretation of the above provisions should take into account both the requirements arising from the right of access to court and the right to be heard without unreasonable delay and the need to minimise the costs of proceedings. The described issue, based on national research, is of significant importance for practice and have not yet been discussed in more detail in the doctrine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多利益相关者诉讼中行政法院诉讼的参与人
这一条款是概念性的,涉及行政法院诉讼参与人参与规则的适用。本文的主要论点是基于这样一种说法,即作为行政诉讼当事人的人,根据《行政诉讼法》第49a条以公告的方式被告知行政机关的活动,在满足《行政法院诉讼法》第33条第1a款规定的条件后,可以成为行政法院诉讼的参与人。辅助论点是,出于程序效率的考虑,需要对被指定实体的权利采取这样一种限制,既不侵犯其向法院申请权利的实质,也不妨碍当事人和其他诉讼参与人行使该权利。本文旨在指出,《行政诉讼法》第49a条是《行政法院诉讼法》第33条第1a款所指的“特别规定”之一。所采用的理由是基于这样一种假设,即对上述条款的解释应考虑到上法庭的权利和不受不合理拖延的聆讯权所产生的要求,以及尽量减少诉讼费用的需要。所描述的问题基于国家研究,对实践具有重要意义,在理论中尚未进行更详细的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statutory Regulations on the Financial Economy of the National Bar of Attorneys-at-Law – Characteristics and Proposal for Classification Some Remarks on the Origin of Substantive Administrative Law in Western Europe Constitutional Principles of Electoral Law in Local Government Elections in Poland and European Solutions – Contribution to the Discussion The Right to a Public Trial in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Administrative Court and the European Court of Human Rights Collecting Information from the Public Sector vs. the Economic Development of the Private Sector: Practical Analysis of the Issues, de lege ferenda Postulates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1