An Examination of Herd Behaviour: Evidence from Colombo Stock Exchange

S. M Abeysekera, D. Wijesinghe, S. Weligamage
{"title":"An Examination of Herd Behaviour: Evidence from Colombo Stock Exchange","authors":"S. M Abeysekera, D. Wijesinghe, S. Weligamage","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3889078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional Finance theory presumed that equity market participants make decisions based on rational platforms. However, recent market incidents witnessed investors’ decision-making process is fueled with irrational behaviour like herding. Herding behaviour is a dominant behavioural bias that depicts investors make decisions based on imitating other investors’ behaviour. The lack of research regarding herding, done in emerging markets especially in the Sri Lankan context and the inconclusive results of the studies undertaken, were the key motives for this study. Hence, this study attempts to examine the herding behaviour among investors in Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE) and to identify herding among Bull and Bear market phrases. The daily share return of 20 companies in the S&P 20 index from 2007 to 2018 were taken for the study and the All Share Price Index is used as the proxy for market returns. The model, Cross-Sectional Absolute Deviation (CSAD) and Cross-Sectional Standard Deviation (CSSD) were used to detect market-wide herding. Results obtained fail to find any evidence regarding Herding in Colombo Stock Exchange during the Period of Study. Significant but positive coefficient values attached to the CSAD method implied the absence of Herding in the overall market as well as bull and bear phrases. CSSD method further implied the absence of Herding behaviour during the period of study. Further, this study reflects investors in CSE purely look at risk-return properties of individual counters rather than following other investors behaviour. It reflects the majority of investors in CSE purely take decisions based on rational analysis of price-sensitive risk-return information rather than based on irrational behaviour like herding. Lacking the behavioural biases like herding among the capital market participants transmit a message to regulators and policymakers to develop sound capital market infrastructure based on rational finance theories. Investors should rely on logical information to avoid being bias before taking their investment actions.","PeriodicalId":186288,"journal":{"name":"ICBI 2020: Accounting","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICBI 2020: Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3889078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional Finance theory presumed that equity market participants make decisions based on rational platforms. However, recent market incidents witnessed investors’ decision-making process is fueled with irrational behaviour like herding. Herding behaviour is a dominant behavioural bias that depicts investors make decisions based on imitating other investors’ behaviour. The lack of research regarding herding, done in emerging markets especially in the Sri Lankan context and the inconclusive results of the studies undertaken, were the key motives for this study. Hence, this study attempts to examine the herding behaviour among investors in Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE) and to identify herding among Bull and Bear market phrases. The daily share return of 20 companies in the S&P 20 index from 2007 to 2018 were taken for the study and the All Share Price Index is used as the proxy for market returns. The model, Cross-Sectional Absolute Deviation (CSAD) and Cross-Sectional Standard Deviation (CSSD) were used to detect market-wide herding. Results obtained fail to find any evidence regarding Herding in Colombo Stock Exchange during the Period of Study. Significant but positive coefficient values attached to the CSAD method implied the absence of Herding in the overall market as well as bull and bear phrases. CSSD method further implied the absence of Herding behaviour during the period of study. Further, this study reflects investors in CSE purely look at risk-return properties of individual counters rather than following other investors behaviour. It reflects the majority of investors in CSE purely take decisions based on rational analysis of price-sensitive risk-return information rather than based on irrational behaviour like herding. Lacking the behavioural biases like herding among the capital market participants transmit a message to regulators and policymakers to develop sound capital market infrastructure based on rational finance theories. Investors should rely on logical information to avoid being bias before taking their investment actions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
羊群行为的检验:来自科伦坡证券交易所的证据
传统金融理论认为,股票市场参与者的决策是基于理性平台的。然而,最近的市场事件表明,投资者的决策过程受到羊群行为等非理性行为的推动。羊群行为是一种显性的行为偏差,它描述了投资者在模仿其他投资者行为的基础上做出决策。在新兴市场,特别是在斯里兰卡的背景下,缺乏关于放牧的研究,以及所进行的研究的不确定结果,是本研究的主要动机。因此,本研究试图考察科伦坡证券交易所(CSE)投资者之间的羊群行为,并确定牛市和熊市短语之间的羊群行为。研究采用2007年至2018年标准普尔20指数中20家公司的日股票回报率,并使用All share Price index作为市场回报的代理。采用横截面绝对偏差(CSAD)和横截面标准差(CSSD)模型检测市场羊群效应。所获得的结果未发现在研究期间科伦坡证券交易所有任何关于放牧的证据。CSAD方法的显著且正的系数值意味着整个市场不存在放牧,也不存在牛熊阶段。CSSD方法进一步暗示在研究期间没有羊群行为。此外,本研究反映了CSE的投资者纯粹关注单个柜台的风险收益属性,而不是跟随其他投资者的行为。它反映出,CSE的大多数投资者纯粹是基于对价格敏感的风险回报信息的理性分析做出决策,而不是基于羊群效应等非理性行为。资本市场参与者缺乏羊群效应等行为偏差,向监管机构和政策制定者传递了一个信息,即在理性金融理论的基础上发展健全的资本市场基础设施。投资者在采取投资行动前,应依靠合乎逻辑的信息,避免偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Examination of Herd Behaviour: Evidence from Colombo Stock Exchange
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1