Comparison of loss allocation methods in a regulated system (A case study at Java-Bali 500KV Grid System in Indonesia)

F. Ansyari, C. S. Ozveren, D. King
{"title":"Comparison of loss allocation methods in a regulated system (A case study at Java-Bali 500KV Grid System in Indonesia)","authors":"F. Ansyari, C. S. Ozveren, D. King","doi":"10.1109/UPEC.2008.4651529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, allocations of transmission losses have become a major issue in both regulated and deregulated systems. Two main reasons for this are performance and cost issues. Consequently, there have been a large number of investigations undertaken in the area of transmission loss allocation. The aims of this paper are to investigate several loss allocation methods and then choose the best method, or at least the most appropriate and reasonable method. These investigated methods encompass a wide variety of techniques ranging from the classical (Pro-rata and incremental methods) to the newest methods, proportional sharing and Z-bus. The crucial issues of loss allocation are how to measure it precisely and then decide which method is most transparent and perceived to be fair for all parties. In this paper we will firstly developed criteria to categorize loss allocation methods into several groups and then a method will be chosen as a representative of each group. Then, a real network, namely Java-Bali 500 KV grid system, the largest interconnection system in Indonesia, will be used as a case study and each method will be tested under the same loading conditions tested, hi the case studies the losses will be allocated to each load and generator. Based on these simulation results, the results of each method will be compared and the best method will be chosen according to the criteria derived.","PeriodicalId":287461,"journal":{"name":"2008 43rd International Universities Power Engineering Conference","volume":"65 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 43rd International Universities Power Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2008.4651529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Recently, allocations of transmission losses have become a major issue in both regulated and deregulated systems. Two main reasons for this are performance and cost issues. Consequently, there have been a large number of investigations undertaken in the area of transmission loss allocation. The aims of this paper are to investigate several loss allocation methods and then choose the best method, or at least the most appropriate and reasonable method. These investigated methods encompass a wide variety of techniques ranging from the classical (Pro-rata and incremental methods) to the newest methods, proportional sharing and Z-bus. The crucial issues of loss allocation are how to measure it precisely and then decide which method is most transparent and perceived to be fair for all parties. In this paper we will firstly developed criteria to categorize loss allocation methods into several groups and then a method will be chosen as a representative of each group. Then, a real network, namely Java-Bali 500 KV grid system, the largest interconnection system in Indonesia, will be used as a case study and each method will be tested under the same loading conditions tested, hi the case studies the losses will be allocated to each load and generator. Based on these simulation results, the results of each method will be compared and the best method will be chosen according to the criteria derived.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管制系统中损耗分摊方法的比较(以印尼爪哇-巴厘500KV电网系统为例)
最近,输电损耗的分配已成为受管制和不受管制系统中的一个主要问题。造成这种情况的两个主要原因是性能和成本问题。因此,在传输损耗分配领域进行了大量的调查。本文的目的是研究几种损失分摊方法,然后选择最佳方法,或者至少是最合适和合理的方法。这些研究的方法包括各种各样的技术,从经典的(比例和增量方法)到最新的方法,比例共享和z总线。损失分配的关键问题是如何精确地衡量损失,然后决定哪种方法最透明,对各方都是公平的。在本文中,我们将首先制定标准,将损失分配方法分为几组,然后选择一种方法作为每组的代表。然后,一个真实的网络,即爪哇-巴厘岛500千伏电网系统,印度尼西亚最大的互联系统,将被用作案例研究,每种方法将在相同的负载条件下进行测试,在案例研究中,损失将分配给每个负载和发电机。基于这些仿真结果,对每种方法的结果进行比较,并根据导出的准则选择最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study on model of power grid operation security cost in market environment Hybrid cascaded H- bridge multilevel inverter for fuel cell power conditioning systems Fault ride-through capability improvement of wind farms using doubly fed induction generator Protection, transient stability and fault ride-through issues in distribution networks with dispersed generation An architecture of spatial three dimension visualization information platform for urban power grid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1