Assessing vulnerability of dorsal hand-vein verification system to spoofing attacks using smartphone camera

I. Patil, Shruti Bhilare, Vivek Kanhangad
{"title":"Assessing vulnerability of dorsal hand-vein verification system to spoofing attacks using smartphone camera","authors":"I. Patil, Shruti Bhilare, Vivek Kanhangad","doi":"10.1109/ISBA.2016.7477232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates vulnerability of the dorsal hand-vein biometric systems to display based presentation attacks. The database collected for our experiments consists of624 real and 312 spoof images from left and right hands of 52 subjects, of which 32 are males and 20 are females. In order to assess the vulnerability of the system, we have created artefacts in a more realistic scenario assuming no access to real images in the database. Specifically, a smart-phone camera is used to capture user's hand images, which are then displayed on its screen and presented to the biometric sensor as artefacts. Scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) based image descriptors are employed for image matching. For detection of keypoints, we have considered three techniques, namely, difference of Gaussian (DoG), Harris-Laplace and Hessian-Laplace and performed comparative assessment of vulnerability. Worst-case vulnerability of these approaches in terms of spoof false acceptance rate (SFAR) has been found to be 61.8%, 46.1% and 49.03%, respectively. SFAR values obtained in our experiments are too high to be acceptable for real-world deployments and indicate that dorsal hand-vein biometric systems are also vulnerable to spoofing attacks.","PeriodicalId":198009,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Identity, Security and Behavior Analysis (ISBA)","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Identity, Security and Behavior Analysis (ISBA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBA.2016.7477232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

This paper investigates vulnerability of the dorsal hand-vein biometric systems to display based presentation attacks. The database collected for our experiments consists of624 real and 312 spoof images from left and right hands of 52 subjects, of which 32 are males and 20 are females. In order to assess the vulnerability of the system, we have created artefacts in a more realistic scenario assuming no access to real images in the database. Specifically, a smart-phone camera is used to capture user's hand images, which are then displayed on its screen and presented to the biometric sensor as artefacts. Scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) based image descriptors are employed for image matching. For detection of keypoints, we have considered three techniques, namely, difference of Gaussian (DoG), Harris-Laplace and Hessian-Laplace and performed comparative assessment of vulnerability. Worst-case vulnerability of these approaches in terms of spoof false acceptance rate (SFAR) has been found to be 61.8%, 46.1% and 49.03%, respectively. SFAR values obtained in our experiments are too high to be acceptable for real-world deployments and indicate that dorsal hand-vein biometric systems are also vulnerable to spoofing attacks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手背静脉验证系统对智能手机摄像头欺骗攻击的脆弱性评估
本文研究了手背静脉生物识别系统对基于显示的攻击的脆弱性。我们实验收集的数据库包括52名受试者的左右手图像624张真实图像和312张恶搞图像,其中男性32张,女性20张。为了评估系统的脆弱性,我们在一个更现实的场景中创建了工件,假设无法访问数据库中的真实图像。具体来说,智能手机摄像头用来捕捉用户的手部图像,然后将其显示在屏幕上,并作为人工制品呈现给生物识别传感器。采用基于尺度不变特征变换(SIFT)的图像描述符进行图像匹配。对于关键点的检测,我们考虑了三种技术,即高斯差分法(DoG)、Harris-Laplace和Hessian-Laplace,并对漏洞进行了比较评估。在欺骗误接受率(SFAR)方面,这些方法的最坏脆弱性分别为61.8%,46.1%和49.03%。在我们的实验中获得的SFAR值太高,无法接受现实世界的部署,并且表明手背静脉生物识别系统也容易受到欺骗攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"I don't like putting my face on the Internet!": An acceptance study of face biometrics as a CAPTCHA replacement Performance analysis of gait recognition with large perspective distortion Face alignment via an ensemble of random ferns Iris recognition with a database of iris images obtained in visible light using smartphone camera Rendering or normalization? An analysis of the 3D-aided pose-invariant face recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1