Applying the strength reduction method to study of stability of residual mountains: A particular application

Xin Jin, Yucheng Hua, Qiao Tang
{"title":"Applying the strength reduction method to study of stability of residual mountains: A particular application","authors":"Xin Jin, Yucheng Hua, Qiao Tang","doi":"10.17993/3ctecno.2023.v12n1e43.33-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to huge disaster-caused force, seismic geological disasters primarily induce residual landslide, collapse and debris flow disasters with far higher hazard extent than that of earthquake disasters. Wherefore, this paper, with various vibration slopes caused by the most representative Wenchuan earthquake as research objects, introduces the strength reduction method to the stability study of residual mountains in a certain area, puts forward dynamic stability slope evaluation method based on dynamic and overall strength reduction method to obtain the mountain slope stability situation in the process of gradual instability, searches out the sliding surface of progressive expansion making use of dynamic strength reduction method and calculates dynamic safety index in the process of gradual slope instability pursuant to the calculation advantages of dynamic strength reduction method, so as to realize the analysis and regulation of the whole process of slope instability. The results show that in the stability analysis of a homogeneous slope, the safety index of slope stability calculated by strength reduction method is 6.7%, 8.8% and 10.5% higher than that calculated by finite element limit equilibrium method, Bishop method and Janbu method respectively. In the stability analysis of a multi-layer soil slope, the safety index of slope stability calculated by strength reduction method is 4.8%, 4.3% and 9.4% higher than that calculated by other three algorithms. While in the stability analysis of soft interlining slope, the safety indexes of slope stability calculated by the method proposed in this paper are increased by 26.10%, 29.11% and 26.46% respectively compared with other three algorithms, indicating that the stability of landslide residual mountains calculated by strength reduction method proposed in this paper is the highest.","PeriodicalId":210685,"journal":{"name":"3C Tecnología_Glosas de innovación aplicadas a la pyme","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3C Tecnología_Glosas de innovación aplicadas a la pyme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctecno.2023.v12n1e43.33-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to huge disaster-caused force, seismic geological disasters primarily induce residual landslide, collapse and debris flow disasters with far higher hazard extent than that of earthquake disasters. Wherefore, this paper, with various vibration slopes caused by the most representative Wenchuan earthquake as research objects, introduces the strength reduction method to the stability study of residual mountains in a certain area, puts forward dynamic stability slope evaluation method based on dynamic and overall strength reduction method to obtain the mountain slope stability situation in the process of gradual instability, searches out the sliding surface of progressive expansion making use of dynamic strength reduction method and calculates dynamic safety index in the process of gradual slope instability pursuant to the calculation advantages of dynamic strength reduction method, so as to realize the analysis and regulation of the whole process of slope instability. The results show that in the stability analysis of a homogeneous slope, the safety index of slope stability calculated by strength reduction method is 6.7%, 8.8% and 10.5% higher than that calculated by finite element limit equilibrium method, Bishop method and Janbu method respectively. In the stability analysis of a multi-layer soil slope, the safety index of slope stability calculated by strength reduction method is 4.8%, 4.3% and 9.4% higher than that calculated by other three algorithms. While in the stability analysis of soft interlining slope, the safety indexes of slope stability calculated by the method proposed in this paper are increased by 26.10%, 29.11% and 26.46% respectively compared with other three algorithms, indicating that the stability of landslide residual mountains calculated by strength reduction method proposed in this paper is the highest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强度折减法在残山稳定性研究中的特殊应用
地震地质灾害由于其巨大的致灾力,主要诱发残余滑坡、崩塌和泥石流灾害,其危害程度远高于地震灾害。因此,本文以最具代表性的汶川地震引起的各种振动边坡为研究对象,将强度折减法引入到某地区残积山的稳定性研究中,提出了基于动力折减法和整体强度折减法的动力稳定边坡评价方法,得到了山体边坡在逐渐失稳过程中的稳定情况。利用动强度折减法寻找渐进式膨胀的滑动面,根据动强度折减法的计算优势,计算边坡逐渐失稳过程中的动力安全指标,实现对边坡失稳全过程的分析与调控。结果表明:在均质边坡稳定性分析中,强度折减法计算的边坡稳定安全指数分别比有限元极限平衡法、Bishop法和Janbu法计算的边坡稳定安全指数高6.7%、8.8%和10.5%;在多层土质边坡稳定性分析中,强度折减法计算的边坡稳定安全指数比其他三种算法计算的边坡稳定安全指数分别高出4.8%、4.3%和9.4%。而在软夹层边坡稳定性分析中,采用本文方法计算的边坡稳定性安全指标较其他三种算法分别提高了26.10%、29.11%和26.46%,表明采用本文强度折减法计算的滑坡残山稳定性最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental Analysis on Polypropylene Moulded Part for Performance of Laser Printing Preparation of the environmentally friendly green nano insecticide using copper salts Basic direction and realization path of PE teaching innovation in PSS based on deep learning model Pathological outcomes of covid-19 for lungs infections based on transfer learning technology The significance of the convolutional deep learning model in the intelligent collaborative correction of English writing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1