Retropubic Versus Transobturator Midurethral Slings for Stress Incontinence

Giulia I. Lane, C. Dixon, M. Moy, Cynthia Fok
{"title":"Retropubic Versus Transobturator Midurethral Slings for Stress Incontinence","authors":"Giulia I. Lane, C. Dixon, M. Moy, Cynthia Fok","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780190655341.003.0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter summarizes the results of the Trial of Mid Urethral Slings (TOMUS), in which women with stress urinary incontinence were randomized to a retropubic midurethral sling versus a transobturator sling. Bladder perforations and voiding dysfunction occurred only in the retropubic sling group; neurologic symptoms (weakness and numbness) were significantly more common in the transobturator group. Both objective and subjective measures of treatment success at 12 months were similar. Based on this and subsequent studies, retropubic and transobturator midurethral sling approaches appear to have similar outcomes at 12 months for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. However, the approaches differ in their adverse-event profiles.","PeriodicalId":435097,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Urologist Should Know","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"50 Studies Every Urologist Should Know","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780190655341.003.0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the results of the Trial of Mid Urethral Slings (TOMUS), in which women with stress urinary incontinence were randomized to a retropubic midurethral sling versus a transobturator sling. Bladder perforations and voiding dysfunction occurred only in the retropubic sling group; neurologic symptoms (weakness and numbness) were significantly more common in the transobturator group. Both objective and subjective measures of treatment success at 12 months were similar. Based on this and subsequent studies, retropubic and transobturator midurethral sling approaches appear to have similar outcomes at 12 months for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. However, the approaches differ in their adverse-event profiles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耻骨后与经闭锁中尿道吊带治疗压力性尿失禁
本章总结了中尿道吊带(TOMUS)试验的结果,在该试验中,患有压力性尿失禁的女性被随机分配到耻骨后中尿道吊带和经闭口吊带。仅耻骨后吊带组出现膀胱穿孔和排尿功能障碍;神经系统症状(虚弱和麻木)在经通气组明显更常见。12个月时治疗成功的客观和主观指标相似。基于本研究和后续研究,经耻骨后和经闭口中尿道悬吊入路在治疗压力性尿失禁的12个月时具有相似的结果。然而,这些方法在其不良事件概况上有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Before Chemotherapy Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma The Surgical Learning Curve for Prostate Cancer Control After Radical Prostatectomy Docetaxel Plus Prednisone or Mitoxantrone Plus Prednisone for Advanced Prostate Cancer Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1