SYNERGETICS AS A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF SOCIAL, LEGAL, HISTORICAL AND LEGAL SYSTEMS

Serhii Kudin
{"title":"SYNERGETICS AS A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF SOCIAL, LEGAL, HISTORICAL AND LEGAL SYSTEMS","authors":"Serhii Kudin","doi":"10.30525/978-9934-26-077-3-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this publication is synergetics as a methodological approach to the study of social, legal, historical and legal systems, and the aim is to identify its characteristics as a methodological approach. Methods such as philosophical dialectics, analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, synergetic, systemic, comparative historical, special legal, etc. were used in the study. As a result, it is concluded that synergetics is considered by scientists as a scientific picture of the world, independent science, methodology, interdisciplinary approach, private science theory, general scientific theory, scientific paradigm, so today it is in a state of formation. It was found that as a methodological approach, synergetics directs efforts to the scientific study of such an aspect of development as \"self-organization\", as well as the self-organization of such a part of matter as systems of different nature, meeting the criteria of complexity, openness, dissipation, to study the self-organization of systems within the scheme: \"order\" – \"chaos\" – \"order\". It is proved that in the study of social systems the main task of the synergetic approach is to identify a peculiar type of patterns of social self-organization, which differ from the patterns of self-organization in natural systems. It is substantiated that the synergetic approach has a number of heuristic possibilities in the study of some legal systems and in general directs efforts to identify the specifics of the laws of self-organization in the legal sphere, the implementation of the mechanism of legal self-organization as a result of mutual transitions of the legal order and chaos. It is revealed that the specific problems that arise when using this approach are the definition of \"legal chaos\", the identification of the mechanism of exchange of \"legal information, matter and energy\" between the legal system and the \"environment\", the essence of the synthesis of legal order and chaos. It is concluded that the synergetic approach has features in the study of historical and legal systems in the field of comparative history of law, which are due to the limitation of the \"historical plane\" of research and identify the impact of fluctuations on certain scenarios. It is determined that the nonlinearity of the evolution of historical and legal systems determines the perception of the view of the comparative history of law as an alternative and multivariate process. This allows the development in the field of alternative comparative history of law: the search for alternative in the future potentially positive options for the development of historical and legal systems. At the same time, the basis should be the modelling of comparative situations with the inclusion of the past and taking into account the impact of the future on the present. It is proved that the application of a synergetic approach in comparative and historical legal research, where the object is historical and legal systems, has a number of specific problems. It has been found that such problems are the discovery of the essence of the exchange between the \"historical and legal system\" and the \"environment\" of matter, information, energy; restrictions on the use of mathematical methods; search for criteria for distinguishing between objective and subjective factors that have influenced the choice of this particular \"scenario\" at the bifurcation point; delimitation of self-organization of structural elements of the system and their organization as a consequence of administrative intervention.","PeriodicalId":378664,"journal":{"name":"European vector of development of the modern scientific researches","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European vector of development of the modern scientific researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-077-3-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of this publication is synergetics as a methodological approach to the study of social, legal, historical and legal systems, and the aim is to identify its characteristics as a methodological approach. Methods such as philosophical dialectics, analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, synergetic, systemic, comparative historical, special legal, etc. were used in the study. As a result, it is concluded that synergetics is considered by scientists as a scientific picture of the world, independent science, methodology, interdisciplinary approach, private science theory, general scientific theory, scientific paradigm, so today it is in a state of formation. It was found that as a methodological approach, synergetics directs efforts to the scientific study of such an aspect of development as "self-organization", as well as the self-organization of such a part of matter as systems of different nature, meeting the criteria of complexity, openness, dissipation, to study the self-organization of systems within the scheme: "order" – "chaos" – "order". It is proved that in the study of social systems the main task of the synergetic approach is to identify a peculiar type of patterns of social self-organization, which differ from the patterns of self-organization in natural systems. It is substantiated that the synergetic approach has a number of heuristic possibilities in the study of some legal systems and in general directs efforts to identify the specifics of the laws of self-organization in the legal sphere, the implementation of the mechanism of legal self-organization as a result of mutual transitions of the legal order and chaos. It is revealed that the specific problems that arise when using this approach are the definition of "legal chaos", the identification of the mechanism of exchange of "legal information, matter and energy" between the legal system and the "environment", the essence of the synthesis of legal order and chaos. It is concluded that the synergetic approach has features in the study of historical and legal systems in the field of comparative history of law, which are due to the limitation of the "historical plane" of research and identify the impact of fluctuations on certain scenarios. It is determined that the nonlinearity of the evolution of historical and legal systems determines the perception of the view of the comparative history of law as an alternative and multivariate process. This allows the development in the field of alternative comparative history of law: the search for alternative in the future potentially positive options for the development of historical and legal systems. At the same time, the basis should be the modelling of comparative situations with the inclusion of the past and taking into account the impact of the future on the present. It is proved that the application of a synergetic approach in comparative and historical legal research, where the object is historical and legal systems, has a number of specific problems. It has been found that such problems are the discovery of the essence of the exchange between the "historical and legal system" and the "environment" of matter, information, energy; restrictions on the use of mathematical methods; search for criteria for distinguishing between objective and subjective factors that have influenced the choice of this particular "scenario" at the bifurcation point; delimitation of self-organization of structural elements of the system and their organization as a consequence of administrative intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协同学是研究社会、法律、历史和法律制度的方法论方法
本出版物的主题是作为一种研究社会、法律、历史和法律制度的方法论方法的协同学,其目的是确定其作为一种方法论方法的特点。运用了哲学辩证法、分析法、综合法、演绎法、归纳法、协同法、系统法、比较历史法、特别法等方法。因此,它的结论是,协同学被科学家认为是一种科学的世界图景,独立的科学,方法论,跨学科的方法,私人科学理论,一般科学理论,科学范式,所以今天它处于形成状态。研究发现,作为一种方法论,协同学致力于科学地研究发展的“自组织”这一方面,以及满足复杂性、开放性、耗散性标准的不同性质系统这一部分物质的自组织,在“有序”-“混沌”-“有序”的方案中研究系统的自组织。事实证明,在社会系统研究中,协同方法的主要任务是识别一种不同于自然系统自组织模式的特殊类型的社会自组织模式。事实证明,协同方法在某些法律体系的研究中具有许多启发式的可能性,并且通常指导努力确定法律领域中自组织规律的具体特征,以及作为法律秩序和混乱相互过渡的结果的法律自组织机制的实施。运用这一方法所面临的具体问题是“法律乱象”的界定问题、法律体系与“环境”之间“法律信息、法律物质和法律能量”交换机制的认定问题、法律秩序与乱象综合的本质问题。研究认为,协同方法在比较法史领域的历史和法律制度研究中具有特点,这是由于研究的“历史平面”的局限性,并确定了波动对某些情景的影响。可以确定的是,历史和法律制度演变的非线性决定了将法律比较史观视为一种替代和多元过程的看法。这就促成了替代性法律比较历史领域的发展:在未来为历史和法律体系的发展寻找潜在的积极选择。与此同时,基础应该是对比较情况建立模型,包括过去的情况,并考虑到未来对现在的影响。事实证明,在以历史和法律制度为研究对象的比较和历史法学研究中运用协同方法存在一些具体问题。人们发现,这类问题是对“历史和法律制度”与物质、信息、能量的“环境”之间交换的本质的发现;对数学方法使用的限制;寻找区分影响在分歧点选择这一特定"情景"的客观因素和主观因素的标准;界定系统结构要素的自组织及其作为行政干预结果的组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BREEDING OF DROUGHT-RESISTANT SOYBEAN VARIETIES UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE FUTURE TEACHER TRAINING FOR THE USE OF AUGMENTED REALITY IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF A PRESCHOOL EDUCATION INSTITUTION ANALYSIS OF THE THERMOHALINE STRUCTURE IN THE ACTIVE LAYER OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT ACCORDING TO THE CALCULATED HYDROPHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS BASED ON REMOTE MEASUREMENTS (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE BLACK SEA) UKRAINE’S INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS ON THE WORLD STAGE DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC PECULIARITIES OF THE TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF LVIV (UKRAINE) AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE HYDROLOGICAL REGIME AND EROSION PROCESSES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1