Strange Letters Editorial

Chantelle Bayes, Chantelle Mitchell, J. Waterhouse
{"title":"Strange Letters Editorial","authors":"Chantelle Bayes, Chantelle Mitchell, J. Waterhouse","doi":"10.60162/swamphen.9.17548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue arises from a virtual symposium held on 5 February 2021 which sought to challenge the letter writing tradition, interrogating the communicative capacity of the more-than-human. This seemed strangely fitting, occurring as it did in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic when the nonhuman was asking us to listen; a period of life gone strange in which we were forced to adopt new modes of meeting, communicating and being together-apart. As the symposium website describes, we were ‘dislocated from one another by lockdowns, border closures, and the unsustainability, cost, and even danger of travel’.  The marked rise in letter writing throughout the COVID-19 lockdowns emerged as a means of countering this dislocation, taking advantage of the epistolary form’s unique qualities as a way of being together-apart (Jenkins). Perhaps this trend was a reflection upon shifting temporalities (compared to other ways of communicating, the slowness of the postal service became less crucial amidst shifts in day-to-day realities), but also perhaps out of a desire to connect. But as we turned our attention to the Earth, the environment, to the more-than-human, we were called to rethink such correspondence. The symposium asked us to imagine how our letters might help us to connect with others through ‘arboreal love letters and existential ruminations’ as were written to the trees of Naarm (Melbourne) (City of Melbourne; Hesterman) or by ‘making-strange … ideas of ancestry, earth, law, weather and writing itself’ as Alexis Wright implored us to do in her letter ‘Hey, Ancestor!’ in The Guardian in 2018, or by paying attention to the way that nonhumans communicate with each other, as Vicki Kirby suggests when describing lightning as ‘a sort of stuttering chatter between the ground and the sky’ (10).1","PeriodicalId":197436,"journal":{"name":"Swamphen: a Journal of Cultural Ecology (ASLEC-ANZ)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swamphen: a Journal of Cultural Ecology (ASLEC-ANZ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60162/swamphen.9.17548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special issue arises from a virtual symposium held on 5 February 2021 which sought to challenge the letter writing tradition, interrogating the communicative capacity of the more-than-human. This seemed strangely fitting, occurring as it did in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic when the nonhuman was asking us to listen; a period of life gone strange in which we were forced to adopt new modes of meeting, communicating and being together-apart. As the symposium website describes, we were ‘dislocated from one another by lockdowns, border closures, and the unsustainability, cost, and even danger of travel’.  The marked rise in letter writing throughout the COVID-19 lockdowns emerged as a means of countering this dislocation, taking advantage of the epistolary form’s unique qualities as a way of being together-apart (Jenkins). Perhaps this trend was a reflection upon shifting temporalities (compared to other ways of communicating, the slowness of the postal service became less crucial amidst shifts in day-to-day realities), but also perhaps out of a desire to connect. But as we turned our attention to the Earth, the environment, to the more-than-human, we were called to rethink such correspondence. The symposium asked us to imagine how our letters might help us to connect with others through ‘arboreal love letters and existential ruminations’ as were written to the trees of Naarm (Melbourne) (City of Melbourne; Hesterman) or by ‘making-strange … ideas of ancestry, earth, law, weather and writing itself’ as Alexis Wright implored us to do in her letter ‘Hey, Ancestor!’ in The Guardian in 2018, or by paying attention to the way that nonhumans communicate with each other, as Vicki Kirby suggests when describing lightning as ‘a sort of stuttering chatter between the ground and the sky’ (10).1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奇怪的信件
本期特刊源于2021年2月5日举行的一次虚拟研讨会,该研讨会试图挑战写信传统,质疑超越人类的沟通能力。这似乎非常合适,就像在COVID-19大流行期间发生的那样,当时非人类要求我们倾听;在一段陌生的生活中,我们被迫采用新的见面、交流和在一起的方式——分开。正如研讨会网站所描述的那样,我们“因封锁、边境关闭、旅行的不可持续性、成本甚至危险而彼此脱节”。在COVID-19封锁期间,信件写作的显著增加成为应对这种错位的一种手段,利用书信形式的独特品质作为一种分开的方式(詹金斯)。也许这种趋势反映了时间性的变化(与其他通信方式相比,邮政服务的缓慢在日常现实的变化中变得不那么重要了),但也可能是出于联系的愿望。但当我们把注意力转向地球、环境和超越人类的东西时,我们被要求重新思考这种联系。研讨会要求我们想象我们的信件如何帮助我们通过写给Naarm(墨尔本)的树的“树上的情书和存在主义的沉思”与他人联系。或者像亚历克西斯·赖特(Alexis Wright)在她的信《嘿,祖先!》(Hey, Ancestor!)中恳求我们做的那样,“创造关于祖先、大地、法律、天气和写作本身的奇怪的想法”。,或者关注一下非人类之间的交流方式,就像维基·柯比(Vicki Kirby)在描述闪电时所说的那样,闪电是“一种地面和天空之间断断续续的喋喋不休”(10)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Collective Memory of the Hairy Man [Book Review] Teya Brooks Pribac's Enter the Animal Editorial Note: Ngā Tohu o te Huarere On Sharks Unseen [Review]Iris Ralph, Packing Death in Australian Literature: Ecosides and Eco-Sides, Routledge, 2022, 174pp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1