SOME ISSUES ON NATIONAL IDENTITY OF GEORGIAN MUSLIMS

Nadim Varshanidze, Emzar Kakhidze
{"title":"SOME ISSUES ON NATIONAL IDENTITY\nOF GEORGIAN MUSLIMS","authors":"Nadim Varshanidze, Emzar Kakhidze","doi":"10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/varshanidze/kakhidze","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The southern region of Georgia, historical Meskheti which according to tradition\nwas primary converted in Christianity even in the 1st century AD was occupied by Ottomans\nsince 16th century AD. Only the territories of present Samtskhe-Javakheti and\nAjara, approximatelyone third of ancient Messkheti are parts of modern state of Georgia\nbeing a part of the Russian Empire since 1829 and 1878 in sequence.It is interesting\nthe different results, which occurred after the entire process. The Muslim inhabitants of\nSamtskhe-Javakheti, unlike of Ajarians, could not keep up the national consciousness\nand as of today it admits itself like ethnic Turks. There are some important reasons\namong which we should emphasize Ottoman ruling traditions and characteristics of\nGeorgian political and cultural life in the 19th century.\nThe case is that Samtskhe in the middle ages was the active political player unlike\nAjara. It was one of the initiator of decentralization and because of this significantly\nthe main victim of Ottoman occupation. In 16th-19th centuries Ottomans established\ntheir governance institutions definitely in this region and islamization, like to administrative\ncenters in the Balkans, most profoundly is noticed there. On the other hand, in\nthe 1830s when Samtskhe-Javakheti entered to Russian province inhabited by eastern\nGeorgians, upper intellectual strata was in the process of formation. The tradition that\nprevented Muslims from perception of being Georgians, was still strong. Only later, in\nthe 1870s Muslim population of Samtskhe-Javakheti were promulgated as Georgians\nby the request of Georgian society. It was late though, however such policies justified\nin newly joined Ajara.\nTo say shortly, geographical conditions, faulty infrastructure and advanced ideas\nappeared in the second half of the 19th century in Georgia contributed to preservation\nof inhabitants of Ajara within the framework of the Georgian national identity.","PeriodicalId":124291,"journal":{"name":"Pro Georgia","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Georgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/varshanidze/kakhidze","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The southern region of Georgia, historical Meskheti which according to tradition was primary converted in Christianity even in the 1st century AD was occupied by Ottomans since 16th century AD. Only the territories of present Samtskhe-Javakheti and Ajara, approximatelyone third of ancient Messkheti are parts of modern state of Georgia being a part of the Russian Empire since 1829 and 1878 in sequence.It is interesting the different results, which occurred after the entire process. The Muslim inhabitants of Samtskhe-Javakheti, unlike of Ajarians, could not keep up the national consciousness and as of today it admits itself like ethnic Turks. There are some important reasons among which we should emphasize Ottoman ruling traditions and characteristics of Georgian political and cultural life in the 19th century. The case is that Samtskhe in the middle ages was the active political player unlike Ajara. It was one of the initiator of decentralization and because of this significantly the main victim of Ottoman occupation. In 16th-19th centuries Ottomans established their governance institutions definitely in this region and islamization, like to administrative centers in the Balkans, most profoundly is noticed there. On the other hand, in the 1830s when Samtskhe-Javakheti entered to Russian province inhabited by eastern Georgians, upper intellectual strata was in the process of formation. The tradition that prevented Muslims from perception of being Georgians, was still strong. Only later, in the 1870s Muslim population of Samtskhe-Javakheti were promulgated as Georgians by the request of Georgian society. It was late though, however such policies justified in newly joined Ajara. To say shortly, geographical conditions, faulty infrastructure and advanced ideas appeared in the second half of the 19th century in Georgia contributed to preservation of inhabitants of Ajara within the framework of the Georgian national identity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
格鲁吉亚穆斯林的民族认同问题
格鲁吉亚南部地区,历史上的Meskheti,根据传统,即使在公元1世纪也主要皈依基督教,自公元16世纪以来被奥斯曼帝国占领。只有现在的Samtskhe-Javakheti和ajara的领土,大约三分之一的古代meskheti是现代格鲁吉亚国家的一部分,自1829年和1878年以来依次成为俄罗斯帝国的一部分。有趣的是,在整个过程之后出现了不同的结果。samtsche - javakheti的穆斯林居民,不像阿扎里亚人,不能保持民族意识,直到今天,他们承认自己像土耳其人一样。有一些重要的原因,其中我们应该强调奥斯曼帝国的统治传统和19世纪格鲁吉亚政治文化生活的特点。事实是,与阿加拉不同,中世纪的萨姆茨基是活跃的政治参与者。它是权力下放的发起者之一,正因为如此,它是奥斯曼占领的主要受害者。在16 -19世纪,奥斯曼人在这一地区建立了他们的统治机构,伊斯兰化,就像巴尔干地区的行政中心一样,在那里得到了最深刻的关注。另一方面,在19世纪30年代,当萨姆茨克-贾瓦赫蒂进入俄罗斯东格鲁吉亚人居住的省份时,上层知识阶层正在形成。阻止穆斯林被认为是格鲁吉亚人的传统仍然很强大。直到19世纪70年代,应格鲁吉亚社会的要求,萨姆茨克-贾瓦赫蒂的穆斯林人口才被宣布为格鲁吉亚人。然而,在新加入的印度,这样的政策是合理的,但为时已晚。简而言之,19世纪下半叶格鲁吉亚出现的地理条件、不完善的基础设施和先进的思想,有助于在格鲁吉亚民族认同的框架内保存阿加拉居民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REPORT FROM THE SEMINAR OF THE POLISH-GEORGIAN HISTORIANS’ COMMISSION NATIONAL IDENTITY AND GEORGIAN UNITY IN THE 8TH-9TH CENTURIES KSIĄDZ, KTÓREGO PARAFIĄ JEST EUROPA… Wizyta dr Grzegorza Peradze w „I. K. C”.1 DIPLOMATIC CONTACTS OF THE GEORGIANS WITH THE MONGOLS (1235–1335) ARTISTIC RESEARCH PHILOSOPHY AND GEORGIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1