Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/penkowska
K. Penkowska
Caucasian Jews and Georgian Jews are among the many ethnic groups that now inhabit Azerbaijan. The largest clusters of these communities are in such cities as Baku, Quba (a suburb of Krasnaya Sloboda) and Oghuz (formerly Vartashen). The uniqueness of the Jewish community in the Caucasus lies primarily in the specificity of their culture, traditions and customs, which were influenced by close contacts with individual Caucasian peoples for many years. This article is an attempt to show the agglomeration of Caucasian Jews and Georgian Jews in Azerbaijan. On the other hand, it is also worth noting the process of their assimilation in a Muslim country and the attitude of the authorities in Azerbaijan to the Jewish community.
{"title":"AGGLOMERATIONS OF CAUCASIAN JEWS\u0000AND GEORGIAN JEWS IN AZERBAIJAN.\u0000LIFE OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES IN A MUSLIM STATE","authors":"K. Penkowska","doi":"10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/penkowska","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/penkowska","url":null,"abstract":"Caucasian Jews and Georgian Jews are among the many ethnic groups that now\u0000inhabit Azerbaijan. The largest clusters of these communities are in such cities as Baku,\u0000Quba (a suburb of Krasnaya Sloboda) and Oghuz (formerly Vartashen). The uniqueness\u0000of the Jewish community in the Caucasus lies primarily in the specificity of their\u0000culture, traditions and customs, which were influenced by close contacts with individual\u0000Caucasian peoples for many years. This article is an attempt to show the agglomeration\u0000of Caucasian Jews and Georgian Jews in Azerbaijan. On the other hand, it is also\u0000worth noting the process of their assimilation in a Muslim country and the attitude of\u0000the authorities in Azerbaijan to the Jewish community.","PeriodicalId":124291,"journal":{"name":"Pro Georgia","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133144909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/osepashvili
Lali Osepashvili
At end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, several churches were painted in Tbilisi, but not many of them have survived and I would like to focus on the scenes in western part of the three churches. These are: The Choir of Mtatsminda Mama-daviti Church, the paintings of gate of Holy Trinity Church and the western arm of St Nicholas of Chugureti. In western parts of these churches, artists placed illustrations of Gospel parables, so these three churches have much in common, they are influenced by liturgy, depicting scenes: “Pharisee and Publican” and “Firstborn Son”. The following research is substantial, iconographic schemes in ecclesiastical art are not randomly selected, and beyond these images both art historian and contemporary artist must seek basis for what led to selection of given scenes, as well as how they are interwoven into common idea. The research problem in this paper is the influence of the liturgy on the paintings of the churches and the connection of these scenes with other scenes of this church as well as with other churches of the mentioned period, i.e. showing relationship. Literally speaking, the illustration of Gospel parables in the western part of the church seems to be conditioned by the instruction of one who enters it, but in addition to these two themes, doctrine also has a liturgical content, namely, before Lent begins, the church celebrates the Sunday of Pentecost; and their presentation serves and presents purification of man, his spiritual, inner eye. This problem has not been stated by anyone before, it should also be noted that as I mentioned, there is no uniform opinion among scholars about paintings of churches of this period and it is less studied, which once again emphasizes the problematics of issue to be studied. On the one hand, I use method of iconographic analysis as method of research, which as a whole implies both theological understanding of forms and the judgment of artistic performance analysis, as well as comparative method.
{"title":"LITURGICAL INFLUENCES\u0000IN THE WESTERN PART PAINTINGS\u0000OF TBILISI CHURCHES IN 19TH AND 20TH CENTURIES","authors":"Lali Osepashvili","doi":"10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/osepashvili","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/osepashvili","url":null,"abstract":"At end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, several churches\u0000were painted in Tbilisi, but not many of them have survived and I would like to focus\u0000on the scenes in western part of the three churches. These are: The Choir of Mtatsminda\u0000Mama-daviti Church, the paintings of gate of Holy Trinity Church and the western\u0000arm of St Nicholas of Chugureti. In western parts of these churches, artists placed illustrations\u0000of Gospel parables, so these three churches have much in common, they are\u0000influenced by liturgy, depicting scenes: “Pharisee and Publican” and “Firstborn Son”.\u0000The following research is substantial, iconographic schemes in ecclesiastical art\u0000are not randomly selected, and beyond these images both art historian and contemporary\u0000artist must seek basis for what led to selection of given scenes, as well as how they\u0000are interwoven into common idea.\u0000The research problem in this paper is the influence of the liturgy on the paintings\u0000of the churches and the connection of these scenes with other scenes of this church as\u0000well as with other churches of the mentioned period, i.e. showing relationship. Literally\u0000speaking, the illustration of Gospel parables in the western part of the church\u0000seems to be conditioned by the instruction of one who enters it, but in addition to\u0000these two themes, doctrine also has a liturgical content, namely, before Lent begins,\u0000the church celebrates the Sunday of Pentecost; and their presentation serves and presents\u0000purification of man, his spiritual, inner eye. This problem has not been stated by\u0000anyone before, it should also be noted that as I mentioned, there is no uniform opinion\u0000among scholars about paintings of churches of this period and it is less studied, which\u0000once again emphasizes the problematics of issue to be studied. On the one hand, I use\u0000method of iconographic analysis as method of research, which as a whole implies both\u0000theological understanding of forms and the judgment of artistic performance analysis,\u0000as well as comparative method.","PeriodicalId":124291,"journal":{"name":"Pro Georgia","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125470379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/varshanidze/kakhidze
Nadim Varshanidze, Emzar Kakhidze
The southern region of Georgia, historical Meskheti which according to tradition was primary converted in Christianity even in the 1st century AD was occupied by Ottomans since 16th century AD. Only the territories of present Samtskhe-Javakheti and Ajara, approximatelyone third of ancient Messkheti are parts of modern state of Georgia being a part of the Russian Empire since 1829 and 1878 in sequence.It is interesting the different results, which occurred after the entire process. The Muslim inhabitants of Samtskhe-Javakheti, unlike of Ajarians, could not keep up the national consciousness and as of today it admits itself like ethnic Turks. There are some important reasons among which we should emphasize Ottoman ruling traditions and characteristics of Georgian political and cultural life in the 19th century. The case is that Samtskhe in the middle ages was the active political player unlike Ajara. It was one of the initiator of decentralization and because of this significantly the main victim of Ottoman occupation. In 16th-19th centuries Ottomans established their governance institutions definitely in this region and islamization, like to administrative centers in the Balkans, most profoundly is noticed there. On the other hand, in the 1830s when Samtskhe-Javakheti entered to Russian province inhabited by eastern Georgians, upper intellectual strata was in the process of formation. The tradition that prevented Muslims from perception of being Georgians, was still strong. Only later, in the 1870s Muslim population of Samtskhe-Javakheti were promulgated as Georgians by the request of Georgian society. It was late though, however such policies justified in newly joined Ajara. To say shortly, geographical conditions, faulty infrastructure and advanced ideas appeared in the second half of the 19th century in Georgia contributed to preservation of inhabitants of Ajara within the framework of the Georgian national identity.
{"title":"SOME ISSUES ON NATIONAL IDENTITY\u0000OF GEORGIAN MUSLIMS","authors":"Nadim Varshanidze, Emzar Kakhidze","doi":"10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/varshanidze/kakhidze","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/varshanidze/kakhidze","url":null,"abstract":"The southern region of Georgia, historical Meskheti which according to tradition\u0000was primary converted in Christianity even in the 1st century AD was occupied by Ottomans\u0000since 16th century AD. Only the territories of present Samtskhe-Javakheti and\u0000Ajara, approximatelyone third of ancient Messkheti are parts of modern state of Georgia\u0000being a part of the Russian Empire since 1829 and 1878 in sequence.It is interesting\u0000the different results, which occurred after the entire process. The Muslim inhabitants of\u0000Samtskhe-Javakheti, unlike of Ajarians, could not keep up the national consciousness\u0000and as of today it admits itself like ethnic Turks. There are some important reasons\u0000among which we should emphasize Ottoman ruling traditions and characteristics of\u0000Georgian political and cultural life in the 19th century.\u0000The case is that Samtskhe in the middle ages was the active political player unlike\u0000Ajara. It was one of the initiator of decentralization and because of this significantly\u0000the main victim of Ottoman occupation. In 16th-19th centuries Ottomans established\u0000their governance institutions definitely in this region and islamization, like to administrative\u0000centers in the Balkans, most profoundly is noticed there. On the other hand, in\u0000the 1830s when Samtskhe-Javakheti entered to Russian province inhabited by eastern\u0000Georgians, upper intellectual strata was in the process of formation. The tradition that\u0000prevented Muslims from perception of being Georgians, was still strong. Only later, in\u0000the 1870s Muslim population of Samtskhe-Javakheti were promulgated as Georgians\u0000by the request of Georgian society. It was late though, however such policies justified\u0000in newly joined Ajara.\u0000To say shortly, geographical conditions, faulty infrastructure and advanced ideas\u0000appeared in the second half of the 19th century in Georgia contributed to preservation\u0000of inhabitants of Ajara within the framework of the Georgian national identity.","PeriodicalId":124291,"journal":{"name":"Pro Georgia","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131277234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/materski
Wojciech Materski
{"title":"AUSCHWITZ – THE LAST STATION\u0000OF SAINT GRIGOL PERADZE’S LIFE","authors":"Wojciech Materski","doi":"10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/materski","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/materski","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":124291,"journal":{"name":"Pro Georgia","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125386240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/jalabadze/janiashvili/loladze
N. Loladze, Lavrenti Janiashvili, Natia Jalabadze
As a result of the borderization of the dividing line by the occupation regime in the former South Ossetian Autonomous Region, 135 settlements ended up on the territory controlled by Russia; 34 villages under Georgia’s jurisdiction were divided and a single community was split into two parts. Both Georgian and Ossetian populations on both sides of the occupation “border” cannot cross freely the occupation line, and their private and public property has become inaccessible to most of them. The occupation policy of Russia has led to the disruption of traditional ethno-cultural and economic ties between Georgians and Ossetians, their isolation and alienation. The current situation is causing irreversible damage to Georgian-Ossetian relations and is likely to lead to the transformation of the ethnic and state identity of the population living in the Russian-controlled part. The consequences of borderization minimize the possibility of initiating any constructive process at this stage.
{"title":"GEORGIAN-OSSETIAN RELATIONS IN THE CONTEXT\u0000OF RUSSIAN OCCUPATION","authors":"N. Loladze, Lavrenti Janiashvili, Natia Jalabadze","doi":"10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/jalabadze/janiashvili/loladze","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/jalabadze/janiashvili/loladze","url":null,"abstract":"As a result of the borderization of the dividing line by the occupation regime in the\u0000former South Ossetian Autonomous Region, 135 settlements ended up on the territory\u0000controlled by Russia; 34 villages under Georgia’s jurisdiction were divided and a single\u0000community was split into two parts. Both Georgian and Ossetian populations on\u0000both sides of the occupation “border” cannot cross freely the occupation line, and their\u0000private and public property has become inaccessible to most of them. The occupation\u0000policy of Russia has led to the disruption of traditional ethno-cultural and economic\u0000ties between Georgians and Ossetians, their isolation and alienation. The current situation\u0000is causing irreversible damage to Georgian-Ossetian relations and is likely to lead\u0000to the transformation of the ethnic and state identity of the population living in the\u0000Russian-controlled part. The consequences of borderization minimize the possibility\u0000of initiating any constructive process at this stage.","PeriodicalId":124291,"journal":{"name":"Pro Georgia","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130433906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/kolbaia-raport
D. Kolbaia
{"title":"REPORT FROM THE SEMINAR OF THE\u0000POLISH-GEORGIAN HISTORIANS’ COMMISSION","authors":"D. Kolbaia","doi":"10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/kolbaia-raport","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/kolbaia-raport","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":124291,"journal":{"name":"Pro Georgia","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115207580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/g.sosiashvili
G. Sosiashvili
In the current work, based on the document and narrative sources, we have researched a prominent village, distinguished with its antiquities, located in Patara Liakhvi Gorge – Arbo’s past, its location, ethnic appearance and political history, material culture sites and its ecclesiastic sanctities. The adventure of the family in the mentioned village, that of the member of the government of the First Democratic Republic of Georgia – Giorgi Juruli. A separate place is designated to the life and activities of the family of Ilia Makarashvili – a son-in-law of Juruli family, who also resided in Arbo. Juruli’s and Makarashvili’s played an important role in the development of the political, cultural and public life of our country. Their family estate located in Arbo had represented a place for gathering for the Georgian intellectual elite during the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century. The rich archival materials helped us to a certain extent to revitalize the activities of these families, who nowadays are forgotten and younger generation does not know much about them. The descendants of Juruli’s and Makarashvili’s reside in France and Peru. From our point of view, the current book will arouse an interest among the members of our society in reference to the renowned figures and will bring a modest input into bringing the descendants of the famous families close to their homeland and roots.
{"title":"THE UKNOWN EPISODES\u0000OF THE LIFE OF GIORGI JURULI\u0000MINISTER OF FINANCE, TRADE AND INDUSTRY\u0000OF THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA\u0000(1918–1921)","authors":"G. Sosiashvili","doi":"10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/g.sosiashvili","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/g.sosiashvili","url":null,"abstract":"In the current work, based on the document and narrative sources, we have researched\u0000a prominent village, distinguished with its antiquities, located in Patara Liakhvi\u0000Gorge – Arbo’s past, its location, ethnic appearance and political history, material\u0000culture sites and its ecclesiastic sanctities. The adventure of the family in the\u0000mentioned village, that of the member of the government of the First Democratic Republic\u0000of Georgia – Giorgi Juruli. A separate place is designated to the life and activities\u0000of the family of Ilia Makarashvili – a son-in-law of Juruli family, who also resided\u0000in Arbo. Juruli’s and Makarashvili’s played an important role in the development of\u0000the political, cultural and public life of our country. Their family estate located in Arbo\u0000had represented a place for gathering for the Georgian intellectual elite during the end\u0000of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century. The rich archival materials\u0000helped us to a certain extent to revitalize the activities of these families, who nowadays\u0000are forgotten and younger generation does not know much about them. The descendants\u0000of Juruli’s and Makarashvili’s reside in France and Peru. From our point of view,\u0000the current book will arouse an interest among the members of our society in reference\u0000to the renowned figures and will bring a modest input into bringing the descendants of\u0000the famous families close to their homeland and roots.","PeriodicalId":124291,"journal":{"name":"Pro Georgia","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128125653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/machai
O. Machai
From the beginning of the formation of Pax Mongolica, the Mongols sought to conquer the settled peoples not only militarily but also diplomatically. The status of ambassador to the Mongols was very high, he was greeted with great honors. The first diplomatic contacts of the Mongols in Georgia began not with the queen, but with the mtavars, who sought to preserve their possessions and get out of the influence of Tbilisi. When the large landowners recognized the power of the Mongols, Queen Rusudan also had to submit to the power of the khan. As a result of establishing contacts with Europe, roads for Catholic missionaries were built in Georgia. The Mongols used the principle of ‘divide and rule’ not only in the relationship with the queen and didebuls, but also with the Bagrations family itself. Thus, in 1249, two kings were put on the throne – David Ulu and David Narin, to whom the khan showed ostentatious compliance. Although such a policy did not prevent anti-Mongol riots, the conflict was resolved thanks to well-planned diplomatic negotiations Kurultai and Mongolian festivals, to which Georgian rulers were invited, contributed to the support of allied relations. Informally, the Mongols tried to show respect for the conquered peoples and the possibility of their peaceful coexistence. Such holidays were often held in honor of Georgian-Mongolian marriages. In order to strengthen the alliance with the Christians, the Mongols showed religious tolerance, performed Christian rituals, and treated the shrines with respect. Such a policy was a key component in building an alliance to fight the Muslim Ulus of Jochi and Syria. Although Georgia was subordinate to Ilkhanate, that did not prevent its leaders from conducting secret diplomacy with Egypt and Ulus of Jochi, which were the Hulaguid’s main rivals. Ilkhan had to carefully eliminate the forces that focused on the Golden Horde. The Georgians, realizing that the Hulaguids depended on them, were often in the khan’s immediate entourage, and, enjoying his trust, the Georgian kings gradually managed to get rid of their influence and recreate the Georgian kingdom. Therefore, the specifics of diplomatic relations between the Mongols and the Georgians stood out with significant compliance, in contrast to their relations with other conquered peoples.
{"title":"DIPLOMATIC CONTACTS OF THE GEORGIANS\u0000WITH THE MONGOLS (1235–1335)","authors":"O. Machai","doi":"10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/machai","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32690/1230-1604/pg32/machai","url":null,"abstract":"From the beginning of the formation of Pax Mongolica, the Mongols sought to\u0000conquer the settled peoples not only militarily but also diplomatically. The status of\u0000ambassador to the Mongols was very high, he was greeted with great honors. The first\u0000diplomatic contacts of the Mongols in Georgia began not with the queen, but with the\u0000mtavars, who sought to preserve their possessions and get out of the influence of Tbilisi.\u0000When the large landowners recognized the power of the Mongols, Queen Rusudan\u0000also had to submit to the power of the khan. As a result of establishing contacts with\u0000Europe, roads for Catholic missionaries were built in Georgia.\u0000The Mongols used the principle of ‘divide and rule’ not only in the relationship\u0000with the queen and didebuls, but also with the Bagrations family itself. Thus, in 1249,\u0000two kings were put on the throne – David Ulu and David Narin, to whom the khan\u0000showed ostentatious compliance. Although such a policy did not prevent anti-Mongol\u0000riots, the conflict was resolved thanks to well-planned diplomatic negotiations\u0000Kurultai and Mongolian festivals, to which Georgian rulers were invited, contributed\u0000to the support of allied relations. Informally, the Mongols tried to show respect for\u0000the conquered peoples and the possibility of their peaceful coexistence. Such holidays\u0000were often held in honor of Georgian-Mongolian marriages. In order to strengthen the\u0000alliance with the Christians, the Mongols showed religious tolerance, performed Christian\u0000rituals, and treated the shrines with respect. Such a policy was a key component in\u0000building an alliance to fight the Muslim Ulus of Jochi and Syria.\u0000Although Georgia was subordinate to Ilkhanate, that did not prevent its leaders\u0000from conducting secret diplomacy with Egypt and Ulus of Jochi, which were the Hulaguid’s\u0000main rivals. Ilkhan had to carefully eliminate the forces that focused on the\u0000Golden Horde. The Georgians, realizing that the Hulaguids depended on them, were\u0000often in the khan’s immediate entourage, and, enjoying his trust, the Georgian kings\u0000gradually managed to get rid of their influence and recreate the Georgian kingdom.\u0000Therefore, the specifics of diplomatic relations between the Mongols and the Georgians\u0000stood out with significant compliance, in contrast to their relations with other\u0000conquered peoples.","PeriodicalId":124291,"journal":{"name":"Pro Georgia","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117042792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.32690/1230-1604/hrychorczuk
Natalia Hrychorczuk
The article presents the issue of Iranian lands in the South Caucasus – from ancient times to the fall of the Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic. The South Caucasus was shown as one geopolitical entity that was ruled by neighboring powers, including Iran, Russia, and Turkey over the years. The author proves that relations between regional countries are deeply rooted in the historical background which causes different historiographies. Due to the fact historiography is used in politics and territorial claims, Armenian and Iranian historiographies are opposed to Azerbaijani’s official narrative. The author’s main goal was to underline the historical context of contemporary Iranian-Azerbaijani relations as well as the specificity of Iran’s historical contacts with the countries and peoples of the South Caucasus.
{"title":"THE PROBLEM OF THE FORMER IRANIAN\u0000LANDS OF THE SOUTH CAUCASUS FROM\u0000A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE","authors":"Natalia Hrychorczuk","doi":"10.32690/1230-1604/hrychorczuk","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32690/1230-1604/hrychorczuk","url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the issue of Iranian lands in the South Caucasus – from ancient\u0000times to the fall of the Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic. The South\u0000Caucasus was shown as one geopolitical entity that was ruled by neighboring powers,\u0000including Iran, Russia, and Turkey over the years. The author proves that relations between\u0000regional countries are deeply rooted in the historical background which causes\u0000different historiographies. Due to the fact historiography is used in politics and territorial\u0000claims, Armenian and Iranian historiographies are opposed to Azerbaijani’s official\u0000narrative. The author’s main goal was to underline the historical context of contemporary\u0000Iranian-Azerbaijani relations as well as the specificity of Iran’s historical contacts\u0000with the countries and peoples of the South Caucasus.","PeriodicalId":124291,"journal":{"name":"Pro Georgia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124336879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：