Developing disciplinary competencies in an “hybrid model” comparing “on-line” versus “face-to-face” interaction between students and lecturers

Luis H. Hernandez-Carrasco, Monica D. Hernandez-Sanchez, M. Rodríguez-Paz
{"title":"Developing disciplinary competencies in an “hybrid model” comparing “on-line” versus “face-to-face” interaction between students and lecturers","authors":"Luis H. Hernandez-Carrasco, Monica D. Hernandez-Sanchez, M. Rodríguez-Paz","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From March 2019 through September 2021, most universities in our country had to turn into an online model in all the courses and programs. When students started to attend the lectures in September 2021, the universities implemented a hybrid model, having simultaneously students on-line and face-to-face. The teachers and lecturers since then have faced the challenge to pay the same level of attention to on-line and face-to-face students. Both types of students are getting the same information, the same material, and the same activities so we are questioning the level of knowledge acquired and competencies developed in the different attending circumstances. After at least one academic period attending lectures “on-line” or “face-to-face”, students enrolled in the Civil Engineering program between 6th through 8th semester, answered polls and surveys that provided the information about their perception on the level of attention received, knowledge acquired, and the competencies developed. The objective of this paper is to obtain the students’ perception of the effectiveness of the hybrid method for acquiring knowledge and basic concepts regarding the disciplinary competencies within the subject's topic, so we asked them for their perception in a qualitative manner to understand how they are interpreting and understanding the need of these hybrid models.","PeriodicalId":416694,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From March 2019 through September 2021, most universities in our country had to turn into an online model in all the courses and programs. When students started to attend the lectures in September 2021, the universities implemented a hybrid model, having simultaneously students on-line and face-to-face. The teachers and lecturers since then have faced the challenge to pay the same level of attention to on-line and face-to-face students. Both types of students are getting the same information, the same material, and the same activities so we are questioning the level of knowledge acquired and competencies developed in the different attending circumstances. After at least one academic period attending lectures “on-line” or “face-to-face”, students enrolled in the Civil Engineering program between 6th through 8th semester, answered polls and surveys that provided the information about their perception on the level of attention received, knowledge acquired, and the competencies developed. The objective of this paper is to obtain the students’ perception of the effectiveness of the hybrid method for acquiring knowledge and basic concepts regarding the disciplinary competencies within the subject's topic, so we asked them for their perception in a qualitative manner to understand how they are interpreting and understanding the need of these hybrid models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以“混合模式”发展学科能力,比较学生与讲师之间的“在线”与“面对面”互动
从2019年3月到2021年9月,我国大多数大学的所有课程和项目都必须转向在线模式。当学生们在2021年9月开始参加讲座时,这些大学实施了一种混合模式,让学生同时在线和面对面。从那时起,教师和讲师面临着对在线和面对面学生给予同等关注的挑战。两种类型的学生都获得相同的信息、相同的材料和相同的活动,因此我们质疑在不同的就读环境中获得的知识水平和培养的能力。在参加了至少一个学期的“在线”或“面对面”讲座后,学生们在第6至第8学期之间注册了土木工程课程,回答了关于他们对受到的关注程度、获得的知识和发展的能力的看法的民意调查和调查。本文的目的是获得学生对混合方法在获取知识和基本概念方面的有效性的看法,因此我们以定性的方式询问他们的看法,以了解他们如何解释和理解这些混合模型的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virtual Laboratory Workshop in Physics Hands-on Physics Experiments for K-6 Teachers at CERN Analysis of dual and non-dual student learning outcomes and student dropout data A Proposed Machine Learning Based Approach to Support Students with Learning Difficulties in The Post-Pandemic Norm Fab Lab-based learning: an environment to promote Women and Leadership in Engineering Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1