Public Access to Information on Private Land Conservation: Tracking Conservation Easements

A. Morris, A. Rissman
{"title":"Public Access to Information on Private Land Conservation: Tracking Conservation Easements","authors":"A. Morris, A. Rissman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2816156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conservation easements reveal major tensions between the privacy concerns of landowners and the right of the public to access information about private land conservation. State and federal governments face important choices about how to provide public access to this information given growing concerns that the public’s substantial investment in conservation easements will be lost without comprehensive tracking over the long term. In this Article, we reflect on the public nature of conservation easements and the challenges posed by their perpetuity, and we provide concrete recommendations for legislatures seeking to improve conservation easement tracking. We employ interdisciplinary methods to assess multiple approaches to conservation easement tracking, focusing on California as a case study.Our California analysis examines the legislative history of state and county efforts to track conservation easements. We interviewed conservation experts and used a telephone survey of county recorder offices to assess county compliance with a California law requiring conservation easement indexing. We also employed a Geographic Information System to evaluate access to spatial data on conservation lands. Despite state, county, and non-profit tracking efforts, access to conservation easement data remains fragmented and incomplete. Based on this integrative research, we suggest that five elements are particularly important to an expanded, statewide system for tracking conservation easements: (1) including as many conservation easements as possible; (2)tracking public financial investments; (3)mapping conservation easements; (4)including specific purposes and restrictions in conservation easement databases; and (5) monitoring of monitoring.","PeriodicalId":342854,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Real Property Rights (Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Real Property Rights (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2816156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Conservation easements reveal major tensions between the privacy concerns of landowners and the right of the public to access information about private land conservation. State and federal governments face important choices about how to provide public access to this information given growing concerns that the public’s substantial investment in conservation easements will be lost without comprehensive tracking over the long term. In this Article, we reflect on the public nature of conservation easements and the challenges posed by their perpetuity, and we provide concrete recommendations for legislatures seeking to improve conservation easement tracking. We employ interdisciplinary methods to assess multiple approaches to conservation easement tracking, focusing on California as a case study.Our California analysis examines the legislative history of state and county efforts to track conservation easements. We interviewed conservation experts and used a telephone survey of county recorder offices to assess county compliance with a California law requiring conservation easement indexing. We also employed a Geographic Information System to evaluate access to spatial data on conservation lands. Despite state, county, and non-profit tracking efforts, access to conservation easement data remains fragmented and incomplete. Based on this integrative research, we suggest that five elements are particularly important to an expanded, statewide system for tracking conservation easements: (1) including as many conservation easements as possible; (2)tracking public financial investments; (3)mapping conservation easements; (4)including specific purposes and restrictions in conservation easement databases; and (5) monitoring of monitoring.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众获取私人土地保育资讯:追踪保育地役权
保护地役权揭示了土地所有者的隐私问题与公众获取私人土地保护信息的权利之间的重大紧张关系。州政府和联邦政府面临着如何向公众提供这些信息的重要选择,因为越来越多的人担心,如果没有长期的全面跟踪,公众对保护地役权的大量投资将会失去。在这篇文章中,我们反思了自然地役权的公共性质及其永续性所带来的挑战,并为寻求改善自然地役权追踪的立法机构提供了具体建议。我们采用跨学科的方法来评估保护地役权跟踪的多种方法,并以加利福尼亚州为例进行了研究。我们对加州的分析考察了州和县努力追踪保护地役权的立法历史。我们采访了保护专家,并对县记录办公室进行了电话调查,以评估县是否遵守加州法律要求的保护地役权索引。我们还使用地理信息系统来评估保护区空间数据的获取情况。尽管州、县和非营利组织都在努力追踪,但对保护地役权数据的获取仍然是支离破碎和不完整的。在此综合研究的基础上,我们提出了五个要素对于一个扩大的、全州范围的保护地役权跟踪系统尤为重要:(1)包括尽可能多的保护地役权;(2)跟踪公共财政投资;(3)测绘保护地役权;(4)在保护地役权数据库中纳入具体用途和限制;(5)监测的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Providing Answers to Some Controversial Issues Relating to Use of Power of Attorney in Real Property Transactions in Nigeria (Part 1) An Inquiry into the Legal Standing of Rogue REMICS in Foreclosures Determining Minimum Compensation for Lost Farmland: A Theory-Based Impact Evaluation of a Land Grab in Sierra Leone Acquisition of Ownership of Real Property by Contract in Serbian Law – Departing from the Titulus-Modus System? When Does State Interference with Property (Now) Amount to Expropriation? An Analysis of the Agri Sa Court's State Acquisition Requirement (Part I)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1