N. Audsley, Robert I. Davis, A. Burns, A. Wellings
{"title":"Appropriate mechanisms for the support of optional processing in hard real-time systems","authors":"N. Audsley, Robert I. Davis, A. Burns, A. Wellings","doi":"10.1109/RTOSS.1994.292567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been recognised that future hard real-time systems need to be more flexible than current scheduling theory permits. One method of increasing flexibility is the incorporation, at run-time, of optional components into processes with hard deadlines. Such components are not guaranteed offline, but may be guaranteed at run-time if sufficient resources are available. This is achieved by providing mechanisms within the kernel for run-time monitoring of spare processor capacity and its subsequent assignment to requesting processes. This paper examines these mechanisms within the context of fixed priority preemptive scheduling.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":103713,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 11th IEEE Workshop on Real-Time Operating Systems and Software","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 11th IEEE Workshop on Real-Time Operating Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTOSS.1994.292567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
It has been recognised that future hard real-time systems need to be more flexible than current scheduling theory permits. One method of increasing flexibility is the incorporation, at run-time, of optional components into processes with hard deadlines. Such components are not guaranteed offline, but may be guaranteed at run-time if sufficient resources are available. This is achieved by providing mechanisms within the kernel for run-time monitoring of spare processor capacity and its subsequent assignment to requesting processes. This paper examines these mechanisms within the context of fixed priority preemptive scheduling.<>