The impact of combination of decision makers’ heuristics on the supply chain performance

S. Moon, T.H. Kim, S. Seok, Y. Kwak
{"title":"The impact of combination of decision makers’ heuristics on the supply chain performance","authors":"S. Moon, T.H. Kim, S. Seok, Y. Kwak","doi":"10.1080/2287108X.2014.956978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analytical newsvendor models assume that order decision makers can place optimal orders to maximize profit, but many of their actual decisions are apart from the optimal quantity. Many scholars in operations management have presumed that the problem might occur in the middle of decision-making process and they attempted to verify the cognitive concept, heuristics. Consequently, three typical behaviors by heuristics were discovered: (1) mean anchoring (2) demand chasing, and (3) gambler fallacy. The purpose of this study is to testify how performance is influenced by the combination of diverse or same decision maker’s heuristics in a supply chain, then to verify the finest combination for the highest profit. This study suggests theoretical background of the heuristics, and simulated results from previous empirical evidences reflect which heuristics is hazardous. In addition, it recommends the suitable heuristics relying on various environments around the decision maker.","PeriodicalId":276731,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Logistics","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2287108X.2014.956978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analytical newsvendor models assume that order decision makers can place optimal orders to maximize profit, but many of their actual decisions are apart from the optimal quantity. Many scholars in operations management have presumed that the problem might occur in the middle of decision-making process and they attempted to verify the cognitive concept, heuristics. Consequently, three typical behaviors by heuristics were discovered: (1) mean anchoring (2) demand chasing, and (3) gambler fallacy. The purpose of this study is to testify how performance is influenced by the combination of diverse or same decision maker’s heuristics in a supply chain, then to verify the finest combination for the highest profit. This study suggests theoretical background of the heuristics, and simulated results from previous empirical evidences reflect which heuristics is hazardous. In addition, it recommends the suitable heuristics relying on various environments around the decision maker.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决策者启发式组合对供应链绩效的影响
分析式报贩模型假设订单决策者可以下最优订单以实现利润最大化,但他们的实际决策往往与最优数量相去甚远。许多运营管理学者假设问题可能发生在决策过程的中间,并试图验证认知概念——启发式。结果发现了三种典型的启发式行为:(1)均值锚定(2)需求追逐(3)赌徒谬误。本研究的目的是证明在供应链中不同或相同的决策者的启发式组合对绩效的影响,然后验证利润最高的最佳组合。本研究提出了启发式的理论背景,并从以往经验证据的模拟结果中反映了哪些启发式是有害的。此外,它还根据决策者周围的各种环境推荐了合适的启发式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fishing-industrial logistics – a special trend in logistics Design and performance evaluation of a healthcare distribution network towards maintaining a direct-to-customer policy Parallel military supply chain for resilience Proposal of a proactive logistics platform piloted by the product Simultaneous production planning of make-to-order (MTO) and make-to-stock (MTS) products using simulation optimization. Case study: Soren Restaurant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1