Extending Quantitative Proxemics and Trust to HRI

F. Camara, Charles W. Fox
{"title":"Extending Quantitative Proxemics and Trust to HRI","authors":"F. Camara, Charles W. Fox","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human-robot interaction (HRI) requires quantitative models of proxemics and trust for robots to use in negotiating with people for space. Hall’s theory of proxemics has been used for decades to describe social interaction distances but has lacked detailed quantitative models and generative explanations to apply to these cases. In the limited case of autonomous vehicle interactions with pedestrians crossing a road, a recent model has explained the quantitative sizes of Hall’s distances to 4% error and their links to the concept of trust in human interactions. The present study extends this model by generalising several of its assumptions to cover further cases including human-human and human-robot interactions. It tightens the explanations of Hall zones from 4% to 1% error and fits several more recent empirical HRI results. This may help to further unify these disparate fields and quantify them to a level which enables real-world operational HRI applications.","PeriodicalId":250997,"journal":{"name":"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Human-robot interaction (HRI) requires quantitative models of proxemics and trust for robots to use in negotiating with people for space. Hall’s theory of proxemics has been used for decades to describe social interaction distances but has lacked detailed quantitative models and generative explanations to apply to these cases. In the limited case of autonomous vehicle interactions with pedestrians crossing a road, a recent model has explained the quantitative sizes of Hall’s distances to 4% error and their links to the concept of trust in human interactions. The present study extends this model by generalising several of its assumptions to cover further cases including human-human and human-robot interactions. It tightens the explanations of Hall zones from 4% to 1% error and fits several more recent empirical HRI results. This may help to further unify these disparate fields and quantify them to a level which enables real-world operational HRI applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将定量近邻学与信任扩展到人力资源调查
人机交互(HRI)需要机器人在与人协商空间时使用的邻近学和信任的定量模型。霍尔的近距学理论几十年来一直被用来描述社会互动距离,但缺乏详细的定量模型和生成性解释来适用于这些案例。在自动驾驶汽车与过马路的行人互动的有限情况下,最近的一个模型解释了霍尔距离的定量大小,误差为4%,以及它们与人类互动中信任概念的联系。目前的研究扩展了这个模型,通过推广它的几个假设,以涵盖更多的情况,包括人类和人类机器人的相互作用。它将霍尔区域的解释误差从4%缩小到1%,并符合最近的几个实证HRI结果。这可能有助于进一步统一这些不同的领域,并将它们量化到能够实现实际操作HRI应用程序的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
I Can’t Believe That Happened! : Exploring Expressivity in Collaborative Storytelling with the Tabletop Robot Haru Nothing About Us Without Us: a participatory design for an Inclusive Signing Tiago Robot Preliminary Investigation of Collision Risk Assessment with Vision for Selecting Targets Paid Attention to by Mobile Robot Step-by-Step Task Plan Explanations Beyond Causal Links Contributions of user tests in a Living Lab in the co-design process of human robot interaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1