Bike-Share in the Sacramento Region Primarily Substitutes for Car and Walking Trips and Reduces Vehicle Miles Traveled

Tatsuya Fukushige, D. Fitch, S. Handy
{"title":"Bike-Share in the Sacramento Region Primarily Substitutes for Car and Walking Trips and Reduces Vehicle Miles Traveled","authors":"Tatsuya Fukushige, D. Fitch, S. Handy","doi":"10.7922/G2K935V3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Fukushige, Tatsuya; Fitch, Dillon; Handy, Susan | Abstract: Dock-less, electric bike-share services offer cities a new transportation option with the potential to improve environmental, social, and health outcomes by increasing physical activity and reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and related greenhouse gas emissions. But these benefits accrue only if bike-share use replaces car travel. If bikeshare pulls users from public transit, personal bikes, or walking, the benefits will be limited. Little is known about the factors influencing whether bike-share substitutes for driving. Understanding the degree to which and under what circumstances bike-share use reduces car travel can inform cities’ efforts to meet VMT reduction goals set under California’s Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (Senate Bill 375). Researchers at the University of California, Davis collected user surveys and system-wide trip data from a Sacramentoarea dockless e-bike-share program in 2018 and 2019 to examine factors influencing travel mode substitution and estimated system-wide VMT reductions caused by bikeshare use. They developed a model to examine factors influencing bike-share demand and estimated potential VMT reductions for hypothetical expanded service scenarios.","PeriodicalId":422295,"journal":{"name":"Research Papers in Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Papers in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7922/G2K935V3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Author(s): Fukushige, Tatsuya; Fitch, Dillon; Handy, Susan | Abstract: Dock-less, electric bike-share services offer cities a new transportation option with the potential to improve environmental, social, and health outcomes by increasing physical activity and reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and related greenhouse gas emissions. But these benefits accrue only if bike-share use replaces car travel. If bikeshare pulls users from public transit, personal bikes, or walking, the benefits will be limited. Little is known about the factors influencing whether bike-share substitutes for driving. Understanding the degree to which and under what circumstances bike-share use reduces car travel can inform cities’ efforts to meet VMT reduction goals set under California’s Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (Senate Bill 375). Researchers at the University of California, Davis collected user surveys and system-wide trip data from a Sacramentoarea dockless e-bike-share program in 2018 and 2019 to examine factors influencing travel mode substitution and estimated system-wide VMT reductions caused by bikeshare use. They developed a model to examine factors influencing bike-share demand and estimated potential VMT reductions for hypothetical expanded service scenarios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在萨克拉门托地区,自行车共享主要替代了汽车和步行出行,并减少了车辆行驶里程
作者:Fukushige, Tatsuya;惠誉,狄龙;摘要:无桩电动共享单车服务为城市提供了一种新的交通选择,通过增加身体活动、减少车辆行驶里程(VMT)和相关温室气体排放,有可能改善环境、社会和健康状况。但这些好处只有在共享单车取代汽车出行的情况下才会产生。如果共享单车把用户从公共交通、个人自行车或步行中拉出来,那么好处将是有限的。人们对影响共享单车是否取代驾驶的因素知之甚少。了解共享单车在多大程度上以及在什么情况下减少了汽车出行,可以为城市实现加州2008年可持续社区和气候保护法案(参议院法案375)所设定的减少车辆行驶里程的目标提供信息。加州大学戴维斯分校的研究人员收集了2018年和2019年萨克拉门托地区无桩电动自行车共享项目的用户调查和全系统出行数据,以研究影响出行方式替代的因素,并估计共享单车使用导致的全系统VMT减少。他们开发了一个模型来检查影响共享单车需求的因素,并估计假设的扩展服务场景下潜在的VMT减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Behavioral Economics of John Maynard Keynes Who Shall Live? Patience and Comparative Development Overconfidence and the political and financial behavior of a representative sample Trade Shocks, Labor Markets and Elections in the First Globalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1