The Limits to Lean Startup for Opportunity Identification and New Venture Creation

John M. York
{"title":"The Limits to Lean Startup for Opportunity Identification and New Venture Creation","authors":"John M. York","doi":"10.29011/2642-3243.100031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lean startup (LS) is an entrepreneurship strategy popularized over the past decade. The LS approach offers entrepreneurs a framework to identify customer needs, market opportunities, and product/market fit as part of the opportunity identification and venture creation process. It also provides firms the opportunity to develop dynamic capabilities to engage a competitive and everchanging marketplace. This paper examines findings from a literature review of peer and non-peer review sources focusing on the limits of LS. Key observations include: (1) inconsistent experiences, with many not demonstrating successful implementation; (2) methodological issues (e.g., setting up of proper hypotheses and experiments, using a proper minimum viable product, and pivoting) exist; (3) biases and getting the right customers challenge customer discovery and interviewing; (4) inability to translate to “breakthrough” ventures; (5) failure to provide for all the essential capabilities for success that venture capitalists seek in a startup; and (5) limited marketing and sales emphasis, which is essential to acquiring customers, generating revenue, and fostering growth. Entrepreneurs can draw on these learnings to (1) recognize LS is one methodology to draw on from one’s entrepreneurial “Toolkit”; (2) recognize these limitations; (3) guard against individual tendencies and biases that will limit effectiveness of the methodology when used; (4) engage in training and mentorship to fully understand the framework, the skills needed, and the processes to correctly (and consistently) implement the approach. Further research should be conducted to build on these findings and explore further LS applications, practices, gaps, and theory.","PeriodicalId":412707,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Business Administration and Management","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Business Administration and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2642-3243.100031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Lean startup (LS) is an entrepreneurship strategy popularized over the past decade. The LS approach offers entrepreneurs a framework to identify customer needs, market opportunities, and product/market fit as part of the opportunity identification and venture creation process. It also provides firms the opportunity to develop dynamic capabilities to engage a competitive and everchanging marketplace. This paper examines findings from a literature review of peer and non-peer review sources focusing on the limits of LS. Key observations include: (1) inconsistent experiences, with many not demonstrating successful implementation; (2) methodological issues (e.g., setting up of proper hypotheses and experiments, using a proper minimum viable product, and pivoting) exist; (3) biases and getting the right customers challenge customer discovery and interviewing; (4) inability to translate to “breakthrough” ventures; (5) failure to provide for all the essential capabilities for success that venture capitalists seek in a startup; and (5) limited marketing and sales emphasis, which is essential to acquiring customers, generating revenue, and fostering growth. Entrepreneurs can draw on these learnings to (1) recognize LS is one methodology to draw on from one’s entrepreneurial “Toolkit”; (2) recognize these limitations; (3) guard against individual tendencies and biases that will limit effectiveness of the methodology when used; (4) engage in training and mentorship to fully understand the framework, the skills needed, and the processes to correctly (and consistently) implement the approach. Further research should be conducted to build on these findings and explore further LS applications, practices, gaps, and theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精益创业对机会识别和新企业创建的限制
精益创业(LS)是近十年来流行起来的一种创业策略。LS方法为企业家提供了一个框架,以确定客户需求、市场机会和产品/市场契合度,作为机会识别和创业过程的一部分。它还为公司提供了发展动态能力的机会,以参与竞争和不断变化的市场。本文研究了同行和非同行评审文献综述的发现,重点是LS的局限性。主要观察包括:(1)不一致的经验,许多经验没有证明成功的实施;(2)存在方法问题(例如,建立适当的假设和实验,使用适当的最小可行产品,以及转向);(3)偏见和获取合适的客户挑战客户发现和访谈;(4)无法转化为“突破性”企业;(5)未能提供风险资本家在初创企业中寻求的所有成功必备能力;(5)有限的市场营销和销售重点,这对获取客户、创造收入和促进增长至关重要。企业家可以借鉴这些经验:(1)认识到LS是一种可以从创业“工具包”中借鉴的方法;(2)认识到这些局限性;(3)防范个人倾向和偏见,这些倾向和偏见在使用时将限制方法的有效性;(4)参与培训和指导,以充分理解框架,所需的技能,以及正确(和一致)实施方法的过程。应该在这些发现的基础上进行进一步的研究,并探索进一步的LS应用、实践、差距和理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International Business Management - Impact of Cultural Dimension on Business Decisions among Technical Directors in the IT Sector Poverty Reduction in Ghana: Microfinance and Small Loan Centre (MASLOC) in Perspective A Digital Strategy for Enhancing the Customer Journey via a Customer-Centric Website Explaining Cattle Farmers Behavior in Selling Productive Cows: Cases of Bali Beef Cattle in South Sulawesi, Indonesia The Odyssey of the Cameroonian Nation: Historical Trajectory of "Living Together" and its Political Exploitation Margins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1