To Cross or Not to Cross the Spread: That Is the Question

Paul Besson, Stéphanie Pelin, Matthieu Lasnier
{"title":"To Cross or Not to Cross the Spread: That Is the Question","authors":"Paul Besson, Stéphanie Pelin, Matthieu Lasnier","doi":"10.3905/jot.2016.11.4.077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traders have always empirically estimated the short-term dynamic of the market. Contrary to popular belief, building a quantitative estimate of the next trade is not some sort of “Holy Grail” only accessible to the darkest high-frequency traders. In fact, this knowledge is easily understandable by anyone who observes the data attentively. Thanks to our tick database, we find that order book imbalances allow us to make reliable forecasts regarding the side (bid/ask) of the next trade; in short, on average, aggressive trades will mainly target the smallest limit (in size). We also find that aggressive trades will consume a larger share when the smaller limit is hit rather than the larger limit. Using this insight regarding the next trade enables us to estimate the risk induced by a passive posting and thereby helps to decide whether or not to cross the spread using objective criteria based on the Sharpe ratio. Similar rules can be applied to trading algorithms to help eliminate many unnecessary aggressive trades and thus significantly increase trading performances.","PeriodicalId":254660,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trading","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trading","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2016.11.4.077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Traders have always empirically estimated the short-term dynamic of the market. Contrary to popular belief, building a quantitative estimate of the next trade is not some sort of “Holy Grail” only accessible to the darkest high-frequency traders. In fact, this knowledge is easily understandable by anyone who observes the data attentively. Thanks to our tick database, we find that order book imbalances allow us to make reliable forecasts regarding the side (bid/ask) of the next trade; in short, on average, aggressive trades will mainly target the smallest limit (in size). We also find that aggressive trades will consume a larger share when the smaller limit is hit rather than the larger limit. Using this insight regarding the next trade enables us to estimate the risk induced by a passive posting and thereby helps to decide whether or not to cross the spread using objective criteria based on the Sharpe ratio. Similar rules can be applied to trading algorithms to help eliminate many unnecessary aggressive trades and thus significantly increase trading performances.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨越还是不跨越:这是一个问题
交易员总是凭经验估计市场的短期动态。与普遍看法相反,对下一笔交易进行定量估计并不是只有最黑暗的高频交易员才能获得的某种“圣杯”。事实上,任何仔细观察数据的人都很容易理解这些知识。多亏了我们的滴答数据库,我们发现订单不平衡使我们能够对下一笔交易的一方(买入价/卖出价)做出可靠的预测;简而言之,平均而言,激进的交易将主要针对最小的限制(规模)。我们还发现,当触及较小的限制而不是较大的限制时,激进交易将消耗更大的份额。利用这种关于下一笔交易的洞察力,我们能够估计被动交易所带来的风险,从而帮助我们根据基于夏普比率的客观标准决定是否跨越点差。类似的规则可以应用于交易算法,以帮助消除许多不必要的激进交易,从而显着提高交易绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phantom Liquidity and High-Frequency Quoting COMMENTARY: Commentary on “If Best Execution Is a Process, What Does That Process Look Like?”1 Editor’s Letter Machine Learning for Algorithmic Trading and Trade Schedule Optimization COMMENTARY: A Market Structure That Fits the Needs of Portfolio Managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1