Android permissions: user attention, comprehension, and behavior

A. Felt, Elizabeth Ha, Serge Egelman, Ariel Haney, Erika Chin, D. Wagner
{"title":"Android permissions: user attention, comprehension, and behavior","authors":"A. Felt, Elizabeth Ha, Serge Egelman, Ariel Haney, Erika Chin, D. Wagner","doi":"10.1145/2335356.2335360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Android's permission system is intended to inform users about the risks of installing applications. When a user installs an application, he or she has the opportunity to review the application's permission requests and cancel the installation if the permissions are excessive or objectionable. We examine whether the Android permission system is effective at warning users. In particular, we evaluate whether Android users pay attention to, understand, and act on permission information during installation. We performed two usability studies: an Internet survey of 308 Android users, and a laboratory study wherein we interviewed and observed 25 Android users. Study participants displayed low attention and comprehension rates: both the Internet survey and laboratory study found that 17% of participants paid attention to permissions during installation, and only 3% of Internet survey respondents could correctly answer all three permission comprehension questions. This indicates that current Android permission warnings do not help most users make correct security decisions. However, a notable minority of users demonstrated both awareness of permission warnings and reasonable rates of comprehension. We present recommendations for improving user attention and comprehension, as well as identify open challenges.","PeriodicalId":273244,"journal":{"name":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1123","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2335356.2335360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1123

Abstract

Android's permission system is intended to inform users about the risks of installing applications. When a user installs an application, he or she has the opportunity to review the application's permission requests and cancel the installation if the permissions are excessive or objectionable. We examine whether the Android permission system is effective at warning users. In particular, we evaluate whether Android users pay attention to, understand, and act on permission information during installation. We performed two usability studies: an Internet survey of 308 Android users, and a laboratory study wherein we interviewed and observed 25 Android users. Study participants displayed low attention and comprehension rates: both the Internet survey and laboratory study found that 17% of participants paid attention to permissions during installation, and only 3% of Internet survey respondents could correctly answer all three permission comprehension questions. This indicates that current Android permission warnings do not help most users make correct security decisions. However, a notable minority of users demonstrated both awareness of permission warnings and reasonable rates of comprehension. We present recommendations for improving user attention and comprehension, as well as identify open challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安卓权限:用户注意力、理解力和行为
Android 的权限系统旨在告知用户安装应用程序的风险。当用户安装应用程序时,他或她有机会查看应用程序的权限请求,如果权限过多或令人反感,他或她可以取消安装。我们研究了安卓权限系统在警告用户方面是否有效。特别是,我们评估了安卓用户在安装过程中是否关注、理解权限信息并采取相应行动。我们进行了两项可用性研究:一项是针对 308 名安卓用户的互联网调查,另一项是对 25 名安卓用户进行访谈和观察的实验室研究。研究参与者的关注率和理解率都很低:互联网调查和实验室研究都发现,17% 的参与者在安装过程中关注了权限信息,只有 3% 的互联网调查受访者能正确回答所有三个权限理解问题。这表明,目前的安卓权限警告并不能帮助大多数用户做出正确的安全决定。不过,也有少数用户表现出了对权限警告的意识和合理的理解率。我们提出了提高用户关注度和理解力的建议,并指出了有待解决的难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Is Reporting Worth the Sacrifice of Revealing What I Have Sent?": Privacy Considerations When Reporting on End-to-End Encrypted Platforms Iterative Design of An Accessible Crypto Wallet for Blind Users Fight Fire with Fire: Hacktivists' Take on Social Media Misinformation A Design Space for Effective Privacy Notices On the Memorability of System-generated PINs: Can Chunking Help?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1