New Fatigue Screening Criteria for the Fitness-for-Service Assessment of In-Service Process Piping Vibrations

M. Bifano, Lyle E. Breaux, Anthony J. Feller, R. Brodzinski
{"title":"New Fatigue Screening Criteria for the Fitness-for-Service Assessment of In-Service Process Piping Vibrations","authors":"M. Bifano, Lyle E. Breaux, Anthony J. Feller, R. Brodzinski","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-84847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Commonly used piping vibration screening limits are typically justified by experience and lack a well-documented technical basis. This paper presents technical background for future Level 1 Fitness-for-Service (FFS) vibration screening criteria. The criteria assess the risk of fatigue in process piping due to bending mode type vibrations. Finite element analysis (FEA) of 20,000 randomly generated candidate-piping models and high-cycle welded joint fatigue curves for both constant amplitude and variable amplitude loading form the stress limits and basis for the proposed criteria. Most importantly, the proposed criteria aligns with historically used allowable vibration limits rooted in substantial experience. The allowable stress basis implemented in this paper considers periodic and random vibrations making it applicable to situations of mechanically induced, two-phase flow induced, turbulent-induced vibration of single-phase process fluid, or wind-induced, which may be manifested as either periodic or random. To reduce conservatism, limits are set for butt-welded and non-butt welded mainline piping to prevent use of a single blanket limit that may lead to unnecessary piping support alterations/additions, or costly piping configuration changes and unit downtime. Furthermore, the proposed Level 1-type criteria are consistent with previously proposed FFS Level 2 and 3 piping vibration fatigue evaluations [1] intended for inclusion in the ASME FFS-1/API 579 (API 579) Fitness for Service Standard [2].","PeriodicalId":128383,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Commonly used piping vibration screening limits are typically justified by experience and lack a well-documented technical basis. This paper presents technical background for future Level 1 Fitness-for-Service (FFS) vibration screening criteria. The criteria assess the risk of fatigue in process piping due to bending mode type vibrations. Finite element analysis (FEA) of 20,000 randomly generated candidate-piping models and high-cycle welded joint fatigue curves for both constant amplitude and variable amplitude loading form the stress limits and basis for the proposed criteria. Most importantly, the proposed criteria aligns with historically used allowable vibration limits rooted in substantial experience. The allowable stress basis implemented in this paper considers periodic and random vibrations making it applicable to situations of mechanically induced, two-phase flow induced, turbulent-induced vibration of single-phase process fluid, or wind-induced, which may be manifested as either periodic or random. To reduce conservatism, limits are set for butt-welded and non-butt welded mainline piping to prevent use of a single blanket limit that may lead to unnecessary piping support alterations/additions, or costly piping configuration changes and unit downtime. Furthermore, the proposed Level 1-type criteria are consistent with previously proposed FFS Level 2 and 3 piping vibration fatigue evaluations [1] intended for inclusion in the ASME FFS-1/API 579 (API 579) Fitness for Service Standard [2].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在役工艺管道振动适用性评定的新疲劳筛选准则
常用的管道振动筛限值通常是由经验证明的,缺乏良好的技术基础。本文介绍了未来1级服务健康(FFS)振动筛选标准的技术背景。该标准评估了工艺管道由于弯曲模态振动而产生的疲劳风险。对随机生成的2万个候选管道模型进行了有限元分析,并对恒幅和变幅载荷下的高周焊缝疲劳曲线进行了分析,形成了该准则的应力极限和基础。最重要的是,拟议的标准与历史上基于大量经验的允许振动限制保持一致。本文实现的许用应力基考虑了周期性和随机振动,适用于机械振动、两相流振动、单相过程流体湍流振动、风致振动等情况,可表现为周期性或随机性。为了降低保守性,对对接焊接和非对接焊接的主线管道设置了限制,以防止使用单一的覆盖限制,这可能导致不必要的管道支架更改/增加,或昂贵的管道配置更改和机组停机。此外,拟议的1级类型标准与先前拟议的FFS 2级和3级管道振动疲劳评估[1]一致,旨在纳入ASME FFS-1/API 579 (API 579)服务适应性标准[2]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improvement of Target Flaw Sizes of CASS Pipe for PD Approval Using PFM Code Preface Effect of Pre-Heat Treatment on Hydrogen Concentration Behavior of y-Grooved Weld Joint Based on a Coupled Analysis of Heat Transfer-Thermal Stress-Hydrogen Diffusion Hydrogen Diffusion Concentration Behaviors for Square Groove Weld Joint Cyclic, Monotonic and Fatigue Performance of Stabilized Stainless Steel in PWR Water and Research Laboratory Interlaboratory Study for Small Punch Testing Preliminary Results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1