Fire in African Landscapes

Simon Pooley
{"title":"Fire in African Landscapes","authors":"Simon Pooley","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fires have burned in African landscapes for more than a hundred million years, long before vertebrate herbivores trod the earth and modified vegetation and fire regimes. Hominin use of lightning fires is apparent c.1.5 million years ago, becoming deliberate and habitual from c. 400 thousand years ago (kya). The emergence of modern humans c. 195 kya was marked by widespread and deliberate use of fire, for hunting and gathering through to agricultural and pastoral use, with farming and copper and iron smelting spreading across sub-Saharan Africa with the Bantu migrations from 4–2.5 kya. Europeans provided detailed reports of Africans’ fire use from 1652 in South Africa and the 1700s in West Africa. They regarded indigenous fire use as destructive, an agent of desiccation and destruction of forests, with ecological theories cementing this in the European imagination from the 1800s. The late 1800s and early 1900s were characterized by colonial authorities’ attempts to suppress fires, informed by mistaken scientific ideas and management principles imported from temperate Europe and colonial forestry management elsewhere. This was often ignored by African and settler farmers. In the 1900s, the concerns of colonial foresters and fears about desiccation and soil erosion fueled by the American Dust Bowl experience informed anti-fire views until mid-century. However, enough time had elapsed for colonial and settler scientists and managers to have observed fires and indigenous burning practices and their effects, and to begin to question received wisdom on their destructiveness. Following World War II, during a phase of colonial cooperation and expert-led attempts to develop African landscapes, a more nuanced understanding of fire in African landscapes emerged, alongside greater pragmatism about what was achievable in managing wildfires and fire use. Although colonial restrictions on burning fueled some independence struggles, postcolonial environmental managers appear on the whole to have adopted their former oppressors’ attitudes to fire and burning. Important breakthroughs in fire ecology were made in the 1970s and 1980s, influenced by a movement away from equilibrium-based ecosystems concepts where fires were damaging disturbances to ecosystems, to an understanding of fires as important drivers of biodiversity integral to the functioning of many African landscapes. Notably from the 1990s, anthropologists influenced by related developments in rangeland ecology combined ecological studies with studies of indigenous land use practices to assess their impacts over time, challenging existing narratives of degradation in West African forests and East African savannas. Attempts were made to integrate communities (and, to a lesser extent, indigenous knowledge) into fire management plans and approaches. In the 2000s, anthropologists, archeologists, geographers, historians, and political ecologists have contributed studies telling more complex stories about human fire use. Together with detailed histories of landscape change offered by remote sensing and analysis of charcoal and pollen deposits, these approaches to the intertwined human and ecological dimensions of fire in African landscapes offer the prospect of integrated histories that can inform our understanding of the past and guide our policies and management in the future.","PeriodicalId":166397,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Fires have burned in African landscapes for more than a hundred million years, long before vertebrate herbivores trod the earth and modified vegetation and fire regimes. Hominin use of lightning fires is apparent c.1.5 million years ago, becoming deliberate and habitual from c. 400 thousand years ago (kya). The emergence of modern humans c. 195 kya was marked by widespread and deliberate use of fire, for hunting and gathering through to agricultural and pastoral use, with farming and copper and iron smelting spreading across sub-Saharan Africa with the Bantu migrations from 4–2.5 kya. Europeans provided detailed reports of Africans’ fire use from 1652 in South Africa and the 1700s in West Africa. They regarded indigenous fire use as destructive, an agent of desiccation and destruction of forests, with ecological theories cementing this in the European imagination from the 1800s. The late 1800s and early 1900s were characterized by colonial authorities’ attempts to suppress fires, informed by mistaken scientific ideas and management principles imported from temperate Europe and colonial forestry management elsewhere. This was often ignored by African and settler farmers. In the 1900s, the concerns of colonial foresters and fears about desiccation and soil erosion fueled by the American Dust Bowl experience informed anti-fire views until mid-century. However, enough time had elapsed for colonial and settler scientists and managers to have observed fires and indigenous burning practices and their effects, and to begin to question received wisdom on their destructiveness. Following World War II, during a phase of colonial cooperation and expert-led attempts to develop African landscapes, a more nuanced understanding of fire in African landscapes emerged, alongside greater pragmatism about what was achievable in managing wildfires and fire use. Although colonial restrictions on burning fueled some independence struggles, postcolonial environmental managers appear on the whole to have adopted their former oppressors’ attitudes to fire and burning. Important breakthroughs in fire ecology were made in the 1970s and 1980s, influenced by a movement away from equilibrium-based ecosystems concepts where fires were damaging disturbances to ecosystems, to an understanding of fires as important drivers of biodiversity integral to the functioning of many African landscapes. Notably from the 1990s, anthropologists influenced by related developments in rangeland ecology combined ecological studies with studies of indigenous land use practices to assess their impacts over time, challenging existing narratives of degradation in West African forests and East African savannas. Attempts were made to integrate communities (and, to a lesser extent, indigenous knowledge) into fire management plans and approaches. In the 2000s, anthropologists, archeologists, geographers, historians, and political ecologists have contributed studies telling more complex stories about human fire use. Together with detailed histories of landscape change offered by remote sensing and analysis of charcoal and pollen deposits, these approaches to the intertwined human and ecological dimensions of fire in African landscapes offer the prospect of integrated histories that can inform our understanding of the past and guide our policies and management in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲景观中的火灾
早在脊椎动物食草动物踏上地球并改变植被和火灾制度之前,大火就已经在非洲地区燃烧了1亿多年。人类在大约150万年前就开始使用闪电,从大约40万年前(kya)开始逐渐成为一种习惯。现代人类出现于公元前195年,其标志是广泛和有意识地使用火,用于狩猎和采集,直至农业和畜牧业的使用,随着班图人从4-2.5 kya迁移到撒哈拉以南非洲,农业和铜铁冶炼在撒哈拉以南非洲蔓延。欧洲人提供了从1652年的南非到18世纪的西非非洲人使用火的详细报告。他们认为土著使用火是破坏性的,是干燥和破坏森林的代理人,从19世纪开始,生态学理论在欧洲的想象中巩固了这一点。19世纪末和20世纪初的特点是殖民当局试图扑灭火灾,受到从温带欧洲和其他地方的殖民林业管理传入的错误科学观念和管理原则的影响。这一点经常被非洲和移民农民所忽视。在20世纪初,殖民地护林员的担忧以及对美国沙尘暴引发的干旱和土壤侵蚀的恐惧,一直影响到本世纪中叶的反火观点。然而,殖民地和定居者的科学家和管理人员已经有足够的时间观察到火和土著燃烧的做法及其影响,并开始质疑关于其破坏性的公认智慧。第二次世界大战后,在殖民合作和专家主导的开发非洲景观的阶段,人们对非洲景观中的火灾有了更细致的了解,同时在管理野火和火灾使用方面也有了更实用的认识。虽然殖民时期对焚烧的限制助长了一些独立斗争,但后殖民时期的环境管理者似乎总体上采用了前压迫者对焚烧和焚烧的态度。20世纪70年代和80年代,火灾生态学取得了重大突破,受到一种趋势的影响,即从基于平衡的生态系统概念(其中火灾是对生态系统的破坏性干扰)转变为将火灾理解为生物多样性的重要驱动因素,这是许多非洲景观功能不可或缺的一部分。值得注意的是,从20世纪90年代开始,受牧场生态学相关发展的影响,人类学家将生态学研究与土著土地利用实践的研究结合起来,评估其长期影响,对西非森林和东非稀树草原退化的现有叙述提出了挑战。曾试图将社区(以及较小程度上的土著知识)纳入火灾管理计划和办法。在2000年代,人类学家、考古学家、地理学家、历史学家和政治生态学家都贡献了研究,讲述了关于人类使用火的更复杂的故事。再加上遥感提供的景观变化的详细历史,以及对木炭和花粉沉积物的分析,这些研究非洲景观中火灾的人类和生态方面相互交织的方法,为综合历史提供了前景,可以为我们了解过去提供信息,并指导我们未来的政策和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Queen Njinga of Ndongo and Matamba Zanj Revolt in the Abbasid Caliphate (Iraq) Routes to Emancipation in East Africa Women in Algeria Uganda–Tanzania War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1