Integration of ePortfolios in a First-Year Engineering Course for Measuring Student Engagement

V. Goodrich, G. Ambrose, J. Brockman, N. Chawla
{"title":"Integration of ePortfolios in a First-Year Engineering Course for Measuring Student Engagement","authors":"V. Goodrich, G. Ambrose, J. Brockman, N. Chawla","doi":"10.18260/1-2--20677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the past 3 years, the First-Year Engineering Program at the University of Notre Dame has used electronic portfolios (ePortfolios) as an assessment tool for their Introduction to Engineering course sequence. While each year the ePortfolio assignments have expanded, they have been focused largely in three types of reflections: (1) student experiences within the college but outside of the course, (2) the skills gained specifically through course projects, and (3) their four year plan to be a successful engineering student as defined by the ABET a-k criteria. ePortfolio assignments were initially included to allow students to reflect on their education, develop evidence of their blossoming skills, and take control of their graduation plan. After the first year of practice, there was a clear secondary benefit to the faculty and student advisors. Anecdotally, student reflections provide faculty with a measure of student engagement with the course and even possibly indicated retention into their sophomore year. For this reason, a more formal assessment was needed to determine if student engagement could be measured through ePortfolio reflections. While students are engaged with their ePortfolios, data that describes their interaction with the ePortfolio (number of times they log in, number of artifacts they submit, hits, comments, etc.) is continually collected. This paper will focus on: (1) how ePortfolios have been folded into the Introduction to Engineering course sequence, (2) if student reflections can be used as a measure of engagement and engineering interest, and (3) what markers within an ePortfolio can predict student retention. Specifically, study measures will consist of: (1) instructor categorization of student reflections and evidence types used and (2) assessment of the ePortfolio data features described above as they relate to student retention through the first year. Specifically, ePortfolio data features are continually collected through the use of a computational mining tool. In an initial study of the fall 2012 semester data, students who left the engineering track after one semester had an average of 12.7 logins to the ePortfolio system. Students who left the engineering track after two semesters and students who persisted into the sophomore year had a significantly larger average number of logins, with 18.7 and 19.1, respectively. Future plans include deeper exploration of ePortfolio features as markers of student interest in engineering, specifically identifying students by mid-semester that are at risk for prematurely leaving the engineering track and deploying intervention strategies for those students.","PeriodicalId":102083,"journal":{"name":"2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--20677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

For the past 3 years, the First-Year Engineering Program at the University of Notre Dame has used electronic portfolios (ePortfolios) as an assessment tool for their Introduction to Engineering course sequence. While each year the ePortfolio assignments have expanded, they have been focused largely in three types of reflections: (1) student experiences within the college but outside of the course, (2) the skills gained specifically through course projects, and (3) their four year plan to be a successful engineering student as defined by the ABET a-k criteria. ePortfolio assignments were initially included to allow students to reflect on their education, develop evidence of their blossoming skills, and take control of their graduation plan. After the first year of practice, there was a clear secondary benefit to the faculty and student advisors. Anecdotally, student reflections provide faculty with a measure of student engagement with the course and even possibly indicated retention into their sophomore year. For this reason, a more formal assessment was needed to determine if student engagement could be measured through ePortfolio reflections. While students are engaged with their ePortfolios, data that describes their interaction with the ePortfolio (number of times they log in, number of artifacts they submit, hits, comments, etc.) is continually collected. This paper will focus on: (1) how ePortfolios have been folded into the Introduction to Engineering course sequence, (2) if student reflections can be used as a measure of engagement and engineering interest, and (3) what markers within an ePortfolio can predict student retention. Specifically, study measures will consist of: (1) instructor categorization of student reflections and evidence types used and (2) assessment of the ePortfolio data features described above as they relate to student retention through the first year. Specifically, ePortfolio data features are continually collected through the use of a computational mining tool. In an initial study of the fall 2012 semester data, students who left the engineering track after one semester had an average of 12.7 logins to the ePortfolio system. Students who left the engineering track after two semesters and students who persisted into the sophomore year had a significantly larger average number of logins, with 18.7 and 19.1, respectively. Future plans include deeper exploration of ePortfolio features as markers of student interest in engineering, specifically identifying students by mid-semester that are at risk for prematurely leaving the engineering track and deploying intervention strategies for those students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一年级工程课程中整合电子档案以衡量学生参与
在过去的三年里,圣母大学的一年级工程项目使用电子作品集(ePortfolios)作为他们的工程入门课程序列的评估工具。虽然每年的电子作品集作业都在扩大,但它们主要集中在三种类型的反思上:(1)学生在大学内但在课程之外的经历,(2)通过课程项目获得的技能,以及(3)他们的四年计划,成为一名由ABET a-k标准定义的成功的工程专业学生。电子作品集作业最初包括让学生反思他们的教育,发展他们的技能开花的证据,并控制他们的毕业计划。在第一年的实践之后,教师和学生顾问有一个明显的第二个好处。有趣的是,学生的反思为教师提供了学生对课程参与程度的衡量标准,甚至可能表明他们在大二的保留情况。出于这个原因,需要一个更正式的评估来确定是否可以通过ePortfolio反思来衡量学生的参与度。当学生们忙于他们的电子作品集时,描述他们与电子作品集互动的数据(他们登录的次数,他们提交的工件数量,点击,评论等)会被不断收集。本文将重点关注:(1)如何将电子作品集整合到工程导论课程序列中,(2)学生的反思是否可以用作参与度和工程兴趣的衡量标准,以及(3)电子作品集中的哪些标记可以预测学生的保留率。具体而言,研究措施将包括:(1)教师对学生反思和使用的证据类型进行分类;(2)评估上述ePortfolio数据特征,因为它们与第一年的学生保留率有关。具体来说,ePortfolio数据特征是通过使用计算挖掘工具不断收集的。在对2012年秋季学期数据的初步研究中,一个学期后离开工程专业的学生平均有12.7次登录ePortfolio系统。两个学期后离开工程专业的学生和坚持到大二的学生的平均登录次数明显更高,分别为18.7次和19.1次。未来的计划包括更深入地探索ePortfolio功能,作为学生对工程兴趣的标志,特别是在学期中期识别有可能过早离开工程轨道的学生,并为这些学生部署干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integration of ePortfolios in a First-Year Engineering Course for Measuring Student Engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1